Just so you guys know what's actually written instead of basing arguments on personal experiences
californian laws
US laws
look up the Civil Rights Act of 1964
summary-based upon QUALIFIED applicants->who cares if you're overqualified as long as you can get the job done? QUOTAS-ILLEGAL; implementation not right, as explained above
FACT: culture,ethnicity, social standing makes a difference in the SAT-in fact are a better predicter in general of how what score you will get
FACT: a study based on UC berkeley students-women scoring ~10pts lower on the SAT than men ended up with the same GPA or something to that effect; guess who scores the best??
i think applied to minority groups as well
lots colleges and scholarships base acceptance on SAT=unfair to those advertently or inadvertently targeted for lower scores, how do you overcome this?? you look at other stuff; go see if you can find figures on a race basis of who got the scholarship, instead of saying i'm a poor green person, that purple person got one; i'm better than that purple person, therefore all purple people that got it are stupid->racism, inadvertent or not its still there.
Also, I don't give a rat's ass how much you had to work for whatever you got because most people did. America has always been about the little guy achieving. This is about giving people a chance on equal footing.
Race classification=BS, its about culture, ethnicity, social standing; its etched into peoples mind too deep, just look at the census what about black/white??
Talking about poor whites-go see what it is for other races
Discimation is basing upon race->qualification, AA-qualification, then adding race to part of the equation. If it was just race, then WTF are you doing in college?? How come reversing it leads to such high disparities??
do something about it or shut your mouth