Alito is a shoe-in

[Uhtrinity]

Actually Alito may be in trouble, turns out he may have lied on his resume. The whole issue revolves around Alito claiming membership with a Princeton alumni group and putting it on his Resume in 1985. When confronted this man, who imho is very bright in legal matters and can quote facts almost as well as Roberts, claimed he couldn't remember.

Specter: No mention of Alito in Princeton group's filesquote - "The files contain minutes and attendance records from CAP meetings in 1983 and 1984, just before Samuel Alito listed the organization on his job application, but Samuel Alito did not attend any of those meetings, at least according to those records," Specter said. "He's not even mentioned in the minutes." Alito, 55, has testified that he doesn't recall joining and has strongly denounced the group's purported support for admission restrictions on women and minorities. Princeton began admitting women when he was an undergraduate, a move he said he always supported.


Lying on a federal job application is grounds for dismissal, let alone what can we expect of someone who will lie to get a job.


As a side note, I caught a little bit of Rush yesterday referring to Specter in the confirmation. He went on the critisize Spector on his Raspy voice comparing him to Larry Flint ... That was his whole argument :roll:

 

[jlmadyson]

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: palehorse74
one word for the Topic: Good.

Exactly.. if the truth may not look right .. just say you don't know, can't remember or anything else you can think of to avoid it.

Yea, like he is going to get up there and spoon feed the Democrats and say, I'm going to overturn Roe once I'm confirmed lol. It's all good though they had nothing on him the whole time and to be honest I believe the Democrats have made themselves to look like, well, asses.

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: palehorse74
one word for the Topic: Good.

Exactly.. if the truth may not look right .. just say you don't know, can't remember or anything else you can think of to avoid it.

heyyy, did you learn that from Bill Clinton? but what exactly does that have to do with my post?

 

[dahunan]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: palehorse74
one word for the Topic: Good.

Exactly.. if the truth may not look right .. just say you don't know, can't remember or anything else you can think of to avoid it.

You wouldnt know the truth about this guy if the truth bit you on the nose.
Believing the likes of Kennedy is a recipe for disaster.

Who does? If he continues to use excuses like don't remember then shouldn't he be checked for alzheimers?

You know the truth about him?

 

[Genx87]

Originally posted by: Uhtrinity
Actually Alito may be in trouble, turns out he may have lied on his resume. The whole issue revolves around Alito claiming membership with a Princeton alumni group and putting it on his Resume in 1985. When confronted this man, who imho is very bright in legal matters and can quote facts almost as well as Roberts, claimed he couldn't remember.

Specter: No mention of Alito in Princeton group's filesquote - "The files contain minutes and attendance records from CAP meetings in 1983 and 1984, just before Samuel Alito listed the organization on his job application, but Samuel Alito did not attend any of those meetings, at least according to those records," Specter said. "He's not even mentioned in the minutes." Alito, 55, has testified that he doesn't recall joining and has strongly denounced the group's purported support for admission restrictions on women and minorities. Princeton began admitting women when he was an undergraduate, a move he said he always supported.


Lying on a federal job application is grounds for dismissal, let alone what can we expect of someone who will lie to get a job.


As a side note, I caught a little bit of Rush yesterday referring to Specter in the confirmation. He went on the critisize Spector on his Raspy voice comparing him to Larry Flint ... That was his whole argument :roll:

Way to pay attention einstein, even Alito has said he doesnt remember attending any meetings of this organization.

 

[Genx87]

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: palehorse74
one word for the Topic: Good.

Exactly.. if the truth may not look right .. just say you don't know, can't remember or anything else you can think of to avoid it.

You wouldnt know the truth about this guy if the truth bit you on the nose.
Believing the likes of Kennedy is a recipe for disaster.

Who does? If he continues to use excuses like don't remember then shouldn't he be checked for alzheimers?

You know the truth about him?

Is this going to be the cornerstone of determing if this guy can be a surpreme court judge? If he can remember being amember of a group 20+ years ago?

That is an interesting new litmus test we are proposing here considering Biden cant even remember praising Princeton in 03 yet saying he never liked it yesterday.

 

[dahunan]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: Uhtrinity
Actually Alito may be in trouble, turns out he may have lied on his resume. The whole issue revolves around Alito claiming membership with a Princeton alumni group and putting it on his Resume in 1985. When confronted this man, who imho is very bright in legal matters and can quote facts almost as well as Roberts, claimed he couldn't remember.

Specter: No mention of Alito in Princeton group's filesquote - "The files contain minutes and attendance records from CAP meetings in 1983 and 1984, just before Samuel Alito listed the organization on his job application, but Samuel Alito did not attend any of those meetings, at least according to those records," Specter said. "He's not even mentioned in the minutes." Alito, 55, has testified that he doesn't recall joining and has strongly denounced the group's purported support for admission restrictions on women and minorities. Princeton began admitting women when he was an undergraduate, a move he said he always supported.


Lying on a federal job application is grounds for dismissal, let alone what can we expect of someone who will lie to get a job.


As a side note, I caught a little bit of Rush yesterday referring to Specter in the confirmation. He went on the critisize Spector on his Raspy voice comparing him to Larry Flint ... That was his whole argument :roll:

Way to pay attention einstein, even Alito has said he doesnt remember attending any meetings of this organization.

I am curious.. I don't really follow this stuff.. but if he did attend the meetings .. would you accept his "don't remember" answer if it came to light that he did indeed attend the meetings.. << honest curiousity .. nothing more.

 

[jlmadyson]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: Uhtrinity
Actually Alito may be in trouble, turns out he may have lied on his resume. The whole issue revolves around Alito claiming membership with a Princeton alumni group and putting it on his Resume in 1985. When confronted this man, who imho is very bright in legal matters and can quote facts almost as well as Roberts, claimed he couldn't remember.

Specter: No mention of Alito in Princeton group's filesquote - "The files contain minutes and attendance records from CAP meetings in 1983 and 1984, just before Samuel Alito listed the organization on his job application, but Samuel Alito did not attend any of those meetings, at least according to those records," Specter said. "He's not even mentioned in the minutes." Alito, 55, has testified that he doesn't recall joining and has strongly denounced the group's purported support for admission restrictions on women and minorities. Princeton began admitting women when he was an undergraduate, a move he said he always supported.


Lying on a federal job application is grounds for dismissal, let alone what can we expect of someone who will lie to get a job.


As a side note, I caught a little bit of Rush yesterday referring to Specter in the confirmation. He went on the critisize Spector on his Raspy voice comparing him to Larry Flint ... That was his whole argument :roll:

Way to pay attention einstein, even Alito has said he doesnt remember attending any meetings of this organization.

Alito probe is a bust

Controversy over Princeton group flares, fizzles

Yea, this whole thing has been debunked anyways.

 

[dahunan]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: palehorse74
one word for the Topic: Good.

Exactly.. if the truth may not look right .. just say you don't know, can't remember or anything else you can think of to avoid it.

You wouldnt know the truth about this guy if the truth bit you on the nose.
Believing the likes of Kennedy is a recipe for disaster.

Who does? If he continues to use excuses like don't remember then shouldn't he be checked for alzheimers?

You know the truth about him?

Is this going to be the cornerstone of determing if this guy can be a surpreme court judge? If he can remember being amember of a group 20+ years ago?

That is an interesting new litmus test we are proposing here considering Biden cant even remember praising Princeton in 03 yet saying he never liked it yesterday.

Biden is a fruitcake.. I heard his lies .. he is a POS just like every other suit around him is.

But not being able to remember.. seems to me that one should have a excellent memory of their personal actions if they are to be a SUPREME Court Judge.. they should be the brightest this land has to offer.. right?

 

[Genx87]

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: Uhtrinity
Actually Alito may be in trouble, turns out he may have lied on his resume. The whole issue revolves around Alito claiming membership with a Princeton alumni group and putting it on his Resume in 1985. When confronted this man, who imho is very bright in legal matters and can quote facts almost as well as Roberts, claimed he couldn't remember.

Specter: No mention of Alito in Princeton group's filesquote - "The files contain minutes and attendance records from CAP meetings in 1983 and 1984, just before Samuel Alito listed the organization on his job application, but Samuel Alito did not attend any of those meetings, at least according to those records," Specter said. "He's not even mentioned in the minutes." Alito, 55, has testified that he doesn't recall joining and has strongly denounced the group's purported support for admission restrictions on women and minorities. Princeton began admitting women when he was an undergraduate, a move he said he always supported.


Lying on a federal job application is grounds for dismissal, let alone what can we expect of someone who will lie to get a job.


As a side note, I caught a little bit of Rush yesterday referring to Specter in the confirmation. He went on the critisize Spector on his Raspy voice comparing him to Larry Flint ... That was his whole argument :roll:

Way to pay attention einstein, even Alito has said he doesnt remember attending any meetings of this organization.

I am curious.. I don't really follow this stuff.. but if he did attend the meetings .. would you accept his "don't remember" answer if it came to light that he did indeed attend the meetings.. << honest curiousity .. nothing more.

Yes, I attended meetings years ago where I dont remember going but was there.
You think people after 20+ years remember every single detail of their life? Especially considering the amount of work an appelate judge goes through.

It is a silly childish stance to say he doesnt deserve to be on the court because he cant remember going to a meeting 20+ years ago.

 

[Uhtrinity]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: Uhtrinity
Actually Alito may be in trouble, turns out he may have lied on his resume. The whole issue revolves around Alito claiming membership with a Princeton alumni group and putting it on his Resume in 1985. When confronted this man, who imho is very bright in legal matters and can quote facts almost as well as Roberts, claimed he couldn't remember.

Specter: No mention of Alito in Princeton group's filesquote - "The files contain minutes and attendance records from CAP meetings in 1983 and 1984, just before Samuel Alito listed the organization on his job application, but Samuel Alito did not attend any of those meetings, at least according to those records," Specter said. "He's not even mentioned in the minutes." Alito, 55, has testified that he doesn't recall joining and has strongly denounced the group's purported support for admission restrictions on women and minorities. Princeton began admitting women when he was an undergraduate, a move he said he always supported.


Lying on a federal job application is grounds for dismissal, let alone what can we expect of someone who will lie to get a job.


As a side note, I caught a little bit of Rush yesterday referring to Specter in the confirmation. He went on the critisize Spector on his Raspy voice comparing him to Larry Flint ... That was his whole argument :roll:

Way to pay attention einstein, even Alito has said he doesnt remember attending any meetings of this organization.

Typical response. slam the messenger instead of the message.

Then why was it on his Resume? If he is so bright and can quote the most obscure legal detail whay can't he remember what he put on a resume. At least he should admit he may have padded it to make himself look good to the Reagenites.
How many federal job apps have you filled out? Are you aware you can be dismissed for making any fraudulent claims on your application?
Yet again more hypocrisy from the right.

 

[Genx87]

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: palehorse74
one word for the Topic: Good.

Exactly.. if the truth may not look right .. just say you don't know, can't remember or anything else you can think of to avoid it.

You wouldnt know the truth about this guy if the truth bit you on the nose.
Believing the likes of Kennedy is a recipe for disaster.

Who does? If he continues to use excuses like don't remember then shouldn't he be checked for alzheimers?

You know the truth about him?

Is this going to be the cornerstone of determing if this guy can be a surpreme court judge? If he can remember being amember of a group 20+ years ago?

That is an interesting new litmus test we are proposing here considering Biden cant even remember praising Princeton in 03 yet saying he never liked it yesterday.

Biden is a fruitcake.. I heard his lies .. he is a POS just like every other suit around him is.

But not being able to remember.. seems to me that one should have a excellent memory of their personal actions if they are to be a SUPREME Court Judge.. they should be the brightest this land has to offer.. right?

What does being the brighest have to do with memory?

I think Reagan was a bright president but his memory sucked.

 

[Uhtrinity]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: Uhtrinity
Actually Alito may be in trouble, turns out he may have lied on his resume. The whole issue revolves around Alito claiming membership with a Princeton alumni group and putting it on his Resume in 1985. When confronted this man, who imho is very bright in legal matters and can quote facts almost as well as Roberts, claimed he couldn't remember.

Specter: No mention of Alito in Princeton group's filesquote - "The files contain minutes and attendance records from CAP meetings in 1983 and 1984, just before Samuel Alito listed the organization on his job application, but Samuel Alito did not attend any of those meetings, at least according to those records," Specter said. "He's not even mentioned in the minutes." Alito, 55, has testified that he doesn't recall joining and has strongly denounced the group's purported support for admission restrictions on women and minorities. Princeton began admitting women when he was an undergraduate, a move he said he always supported.


Lying on a federal job application is grounds for dismissal, let alone what can we expect of someone who will lie to get a job.


As a side note, I caught a little bit of Rush yesterday referring to Specter in the confirmation. He went on the critisize Spector on his Raspy voice comparing him to Larry Flint ... That was his whole argument :roll:

Way to pay attention einstein, even Alito has said he doesnt remember attending any meetings of this organization.

I am curious.. I don't really follow this stuff.. but if he did attend the meetings .. would you accept his "don't remember" answer if it came to light that he did indeed attend the meetings.. << honest curiousity .. nothing more.

Yes, I attended meetings years ago where I dont remember going but was there.
You think people after 20+ years remember every single detail of their life? Especially considering the amount of work an appelate judge goes through.

It is a silly childish stance to say he doesnt deserve to be on the court because he cant remember going to a meeting 20+ years ago.

He wasn't part of their group, but claimed he was on his federal app and resume .....

 

[Genx87]

Originally posted by: Uhtrinity

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: Uhtrinity
Actually Alito may be in trouble, turns out he may have lied on his resume. The whole issue revolves around Alito claiming membership with a Princeton alumni group and putting it on his Resume in 1985. When confronted this man, who imho is very bright in legal matters and can quote facts almost as well as Roberts, claimed he couldn't remember.

Specter: No mention of Alito in Princeton group's filesquote - "The files contain minutes and attendance records from CAP meetings in 1983 and 1984, just before Samuel Alito listed the organization on his job application, but Samuel Alito did not attend any of those meetings, at least according to those records," Specter said. "He's not even mentioned in the minutes." Alito, 55, has testified that he doesn't recall joining and has strongly denounced the group's purported support for admission restrictions on women and minorities. Princeton began admitting women when he was an undergraduate, a move he said he always supported.


Lying on a federal job application is grounds for dismissal, let alone what can we expect of someone who will lie to get a job.


As a side note, I caught a little bit of Rush yesterday referring to Specter in the confirmation. He went on the critisize Spector on his Raspy voice comparing him to Larry Flint ... That was his whole argument :roll:

Way to pay attention einstein, even Alito has said he doesnt remember attending any meetings of this organization.

Typical response. slam the messenger instead of the message.

Then why was it on his Resume? If he is so bright and can quote the most obscure legal detail whay can't he remember what he put on a resume. At least he should admit he may have padded it to make himself look good to the Reagenites.
How many federal job apps have you filled out? Are you aware you can be dismissed for making any fraudulent claims on your application?
Yet again more hypocrisy from the right.

The shoe fits, wear it.
I dont know what to day, it isnt some coverup he doesnt remember the meetings. He admitted to not remembering ever attending one.

 

[Uhtrinity]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: palehorse74
one word for the Topic: Good.

Exactly.. if the truth may not look right .. just say you don't know, can't remember or anything else you can think of to avoid it.

You wouldnt know the truth about this guy if the truth bit you on the nose.
Believing the likes of Kennedy is a recipe for disaster.

Who does? If he continues to use excuses like don't remember then shouldn't he be checked for alzheimers?

You know the truth about him?

Is this going to be the cornerstone of determing if this guy can be a surpreme court judge? If he can remember being amember of a group 20+ years ago?

That is an interesting new litmus test we are proposing here considering Biden cant even remember praising Princeton in 03 yet saying he never liked it yesterday.

Biden is a fruitcake.. I heard his lies .. he is a POS just like every other suit around him is.

But not being able to remember.. seems to me that one should have a excellent memory of their personal actions if they are to be a SUPREME Court Judge.. they should be the brightest this land has to offer.. right?

What does being the brighest have to do with memory?

I think Reagan was a bright president but his memory sucked.

Reagan stuff reatracted as it doesn't have anything to do with this thread.

Being bright and being able to recall legal facts and precident attests to his memory.

 

[jlmadyson]

Originally posted by: Uhtrinity

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: Uhtrinity
Actually Alito may be in trouble, turns out he may have lied on his resume. The whole issue revolves around Alito claiming membership with a Princeton alumni group and putting it on his Resume in 1985. When confronted this man, who imho is very bright in legal matters and can quote facts almost as well as Roberts, claimed he couldn't remember.

Specter: No mention of Alito in Princeton group's filesquote - "The files contain minutes and attendance records from CAP meetings in 1983 and 1984, just before Samuel Alito listed the organization on his job application, but Samuel Alito did not attend any of those meetings, at least according to those records," Specter said. "He's not even mentioned in the minutes." Alito, 55, has testified that he doesn't recall joining and has strongly denounced the group's purported support for admission restrictions on women and minorities. Princeton began admitting women when he was an undergraduate, a move he said he always supported.


Lying on a federal job application is grounds for dismissal, let alone what can we expect of someone who will lie to get a job.


As a side note, I caught a little bit of Rush yesterday referring to Specter in the confirmation. He went on the critisize Spector on his Raspy voice comparing him to Larry Flint ... That was his whole argument :roll:

Way to pay attention einstein, even Alito has said he doesnt remember attending any meetings of this organization.

I am curious.. I don't really follow this stuff.. but if he did attend the meetings .. would you accept his "don't remember" answer if it came to light that he did indeed attend the meetings.. << honest curiousity .. nothing more.

Yes, I attended meetings years ago where I dont remember going but was there.
You think people after 20+ years remember every single detail of their life? Especially considering the amount of work an appelate judge goes through.

It is a silly childish stance to say he doesnt deserve to be on the court because he cant remember going to a meeting 20+ years ago.

He wasn't part of their group, but claimed he was on his federal app and resume .....

Trying to stretch that a bit eh? 1985 is the time in fact he put it on his resume no where does it say 1984 or 83 which doesn't mean he was in the group at the time. Also, just because he didn't attend meetings doesn't mean jack.

 

[dahunan]

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: Uhtrinity
Actually Alito may be in trouble, turns out he may have lied on his resume. The whole issue revolves around Alito claiming membership with a Princeton alumni group and putting it on his Resume in 1985. When confronted this man, who imho is very bright in legal matters and can quote facts almost as well as Roberts, claimed he couldn't remember.

Specter: No mention of Alito in Princeton group's filesquote - "The files contain minutes and attendance records from CAP meetings in 1983 and 1984, just before Samuel Alito listed the organization on his job application, but Samuel Alito did not attend any of those meetings, at least according to those records," Specter said. "He's not even mentioned in the minutes." Alito, 55, has testified that he doesn't recall joining and has strongly denounced the group's purported support for admission restrictions on women and minorities. Princeton began admitting women when he was an undergraduate, a move he said he always supported.


Lying on a federal job application is grounds for dismissal, let alone what can we expect of someone who will lie to get a job.


As a side note, I caught a little bit of Rush yesterday referring to Specter in the confirmation. He went on the critisize Spector on his Raspy voice comparing him to Larry Flint ... That was his whole argument :roll:

Way to pay attention einstein, even Alito has said he doesnt remember attending any meetings of this organization.

I am curious.. I don't really follow this stuff.. but if he did attend the meetings .. would you accept his "don't remember" answer if it came to light that he did indeed attend the meetings.. << honest curiousity .. nothing more.

Yes, I attended meetings years ago where I dont remember going but was there.
You think people after 20+ years remember every single detail of their life? Especially considering the amount of work an appelate judge goes through.

It is a silly childish stance to say he doesnt deserve to be on the court because he cant remember going to a meeting 20+ years ago.

Really.. hmm .. so silly and childish.. and I think you are full of it when you try to say you would not remember.. I actually think you would if they provided some background information to jar your memory.

 

[Uhtrinity]

[/quote]

He wasn't part of their group, but claimed he was on his federal app and resume .....[/quote]

Trying to stretch that a bit eh? 1985 is the time in fact he put it on his resume no where does it say 1984 or 83 which doesn't mean he was in the group at the time. Also, just because he didn't attend meetings doesn't mean jack.[/quote]

Well, the ball is in Alitos (or the repubicans) court. If he was a member they should be able to a provide proof, if not the question is still valid. After all we are talking about a job in the highest court in the land. If not the critizism is just as it questions Alito's integrity. To just blindly push it aside does the process a diservice.

 

[Genx87]

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: Genx87

Originally posted by: Uhtrinity
Actually Alito may be in trouble, turns out he may have lied on his resume. The whole issue revolves around Alito claiming membership with a Princeton alumni group and putting it on his Resume in 1985. When confronted this man, who imho is very bright in legal matters and can quote facts almost as well as Roberts, claimed he couldn't remember.

Specter: No mention of Alito in Princeton group's filesquote - "The files contain minutes and attendance records from CAP meetings in 1983 and 1984, just before Samuel Alito listed the organization on his job application, but Samuel Alito did not attend any of those meetings, at least according to those records," Specter said. "He's not even mentioned in the minutes." Alito, 55, has testified that he doesn't recall joining and has strongly denounced the group's purported support for admission restrictions on women and minorities. Princeton began admitting women when he was an undergraduate, a move he said he always supported.


Lying on a federal job application is grounds for dismissal, let alone what can we expect of someone who will lie to get a job.


As a side note, I caught a little bit of Rush yesterday referring to Specter in the confirmation. He went on the critisize Spector on his Raspy voice comparing him to Larry Flint ... That was his whole argument :roll:

Way to pay attention einstein, even Alito has said he doesnt remember attending any meetings of this organization.

I am curious.. I don't really follow this stuff.. but if he did attend the meetings .. would you accept his "don't remember" answer if it came to light that he did indeed attend the meetings.. << honest curiousity .. nothing more.

Yes, I attended meetings years ago where I dont remember going but was there.
You think people after 20+ years remember every single detail of their life? Especially considering the amount of work an appelate judge goes through.

It is a silly childish stance to say he doesnt deserve to be on the court because he cant remember going to a meeting 20+ years ago.

Really.. hmm .. so silly and childish.. and I think you are full of it when you try to say you would not remember.. I actually think you would if they provided some background information to jar your memory.

ok

 

[Uhtrinity]

[/quote]

He wasn't part of their group, but claimed he was on his federal app and resume .....[/quote]

Trying to stretch that a bit eh? 1985 is the time in fact he put it on his resume no where does it say 1984 or 83 which doesn't mean he was in the group at the time. Also, just because he didn't attend meetings doesn't mean jack.[/quote]

No, I am implying that if he lied on a Federal job app he may be disqualified, big difference.

 

[zendari]

Originally posted by: dahunan
Then he is ALLOWED TO LIE if he doesn't want to answer the question.. hmm Nice Standards you all have set

Justice Ginsberg set that standard.

 

[Jmman]

Let me get this straight. The Dems are criticizing him because he was a member of this group, and now they are criticizing him because he wasn't an active member? Talk about grasping at straws......:roll: :laugh:

 

[dahunan]

Originally posted by: zendari

Originally posted by: dahunan
Then he is ALLOWED TO LIE if he doesn't want to answer the question.. hmm Nice Standards you all have set

Justice Ginsberg set that standard.

I am in the minority here.. I hate all politicians so I don't know who did what first.. all I know is that two wrongs never make it right.. right?

 

[jlmadyson]

Originally posted by: Uhtrinity

He wasn't part of their group, but claimed he was on his federal app and resume .....[/quote]

Trying to stretch that a bit eh? 1985 is the time in fact he put it on his resume no where does it say 1984 or 83 which doesn't mean he was in the group at the time. Also, just because he didn't attend meetings doesn't mean jack.[/quote]

No, I am implying that if he lied on a Federal job app he may be disqualified, big difference.
[/quote]


Where is the evidence that he wasn't in 1985? lol

 

[rickn]

1985? Wonder if they will ask him to recall what color shirt he was wearing the day he filled out his app