AMD 4800 vs 4400?

[tdrez72]

Given the cost of the 4800+, I cannot help but to notice that for .2gHZ less, I can save 338 dollars. Is the whole .2gHZ really worth 338 dollars or should i just get the 4400+ with intentions of overclocking it to 2.4?

This doesn't seem like a very stressful overclock, but I have never overclocked a processor before so I'm a bit nervous. Can anyone provide some useful advice?

Thanks
Anthony

 

[chrisrod01]

Everyone is going to say To overclock the 4400+ to 4800+

 

[13Gigatons]

4400+ for the win

 

[Some1ne]

Everyone is going to say To overclock the 4400+ to 4800+

How did you know?

But yeah, get the 4400+, and overclock it.

 

[Hacp]

Originally posted by: chrisrod01
Everyone is going to say To overclock the 4400+ to 4800+

Just to spite you...

4800+

 

[stevty2889]

I'd go with the 4400+. I have the 4200+ overclocked to 2.53ghz(so far)@1.45v and max load temp is 51c with both cores at full load using the stock heatsink, so you should have no problem at all getting 2.4ghz out of a 4400.

 

[Lyfer]

WHY NOT JUST GET THE X2 3800 AND OC THAT?

 

[Some1ne]

Because the 4400+ has twice the cache. Otherwise I'd agree.

 

[Pabster]

4400+

 

[AnImuS]

Originally posted by: Pabster
4400+

 

[Corporate Thug]

yeah yeah yeah, 4400+

 

[enwar3]

yup 4400, .2 ghz wont get u a noticable difference. for 338 bucks thats a no no..

 

[mOeeOm]

4400+

 

[MDE]

4400+, or to really cheap out get the 3800+ and OC that, I doubt you'd notice the cache difference.

 

[imported_rod]

Between the 4800+ and the 4400+, get the 4400+. It's basically a pair of 3700+'s slapped together on a single chip- why would you even need to overclock that?! That's damned fast at stock.

Personally Im looking at getting a X2 3800+, but if i was going to get something else, it would be the 4400+.

RoD

 

[mode101wpb]

The 4600+ Manchester is the overall better deal.

 

[GamerExpress]

Originally posted by: Pabster
4400+

 

[aatf510]

My 4400+ does 2.4GHz @ 1.3v. Load temp never gone over 40C.

 

[GnomeCop]

just to be an asshole:

get the 4800+ and overclock that

 

[Kalbi]

Originally posted by: chrisrod01
Everyone is going to say To overclock the 4400+ to 4800+

get the 4800+ and OC it

 

[Sforsyth]

Originally posted by: tdrez72
Given the cost of the 4800+, I cannot help but to notice that for .2gHZ less, I can save 338 dollars. Is the whole .2gHZ really worth 338 dollars or should i just get the 4400+ with intentions of overclocking it to 2.4?

This doesn't seem like a very stressful overclock, but I have never overclocked a processor before so I'm a bit nervous. Can anyone provide some useful advice?

Thanks
Anthony

what about a X2 core? 3800.

 

[Sforsyth]

Originally posted by: Lyfer
WHY NOT JUST GET THE X2 3800 AND OC THAT?

oh didn't see your post.

 

[Ike0069]

Originally posted by: Sforsyth

Originally posted by: tdrez72
Given the cost of the 4800+, I cannot help but to notice that for .2gHZ less, I can save 338 dollars. Is the whole .2gHZ really worth 338 dollars or should i just get the 4400+ with intentions of overclocking it to 2.4?

This doesn't seem like a very stressful overclock, but I have never overclocked a processor before so I'm a bit nervous. Can anyone provide some useful advice?

Thanks
Anthony

what about a X2 core? 3800.

Huh?
They're all X2 cores.