I've been mulling over a graphics card upgrade for a while now and the 6700XT as been my preference for some time.
My PC has a pretty new Seasonic Focus GX 650W PSU (2yr old maybe?), and the Sapphire Pulse 6700XT has an 8-pin and a 6-pin power connector along with a minimum PSU recommendation of 650W, so in theory I'm good to go.
However, I have been keeping half an eye on the latest gen AMD GPUs and I noticed something odd. I'm aware with recent gen PSUs of this problem with sudden spikes of much higher energy draw which seems to be mostly affecting higher-end models than I'm looking at, but then I saw this today:
The Sapphire Radeon RX 7700 XT Pulse is priced at AMD's MSRP of $450, which makes it an attractive choice. You still get a great cooler that's paired with outstanding fan settings that result in a whisper-quiet gaming experience that's quieter than most GeForce cards.
www.techpowerup.com
This lists the 6700XT spike as being way higher (343W) than the 7700XT (285W) despite the fact that the latter has 2x8-pin connectors.
And yet...
Techpowerup doesn't have a review specifically of the Sapphire model I've seen so I went with the reference:
The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT introduces the new Navi 22 GPU, which is optimized to take the fight to NVIDIA in the $500 segment. The RX 6700 XT in our review beats the RTX 3060 Ti with ease and achieves performance that rivals the more expensive RTX 3070, with lower fan noise.
www.techpowerup.com
321W.
I'm aware that different cards will be clocked differently, but the variation makes me wonder what the likely figure is for the 6700XT and whether I might be better off going for the 7700XT if I'm interested in less power oddness.
Thoughts?