Sorry for my "lack of knowledge"....
Per the article on this site:
"Unfortunately, one big downside of the VIA KT133 chipset was that overclocking the front side bus (FSB) was simply not effective since, in most cases, it would not run any faster than 110MHz, a mere 10% overclock."
Guess I thought with the hardware I chose that I would fall somewhere within the "most cases".
I also thought that should I NOT fall within "most cases" that it would be a simple matter to change the BIOS back to the factory default, and life would go on. I certainly never expected to fry the CPU, or entirely lock the system up so bad I couldn't get back out of the situation. While OC'ing may have it's hazards, typically I equate those to doing something way out on the fringe, or lack of cooling, and everything I read did not indicate that anything I planned would be extreme.
It seems that resetting the board is more of an issue with ASUS then AMD, if indeed the CPU survived. Still it doesn't seem to live up to the many adjustments I have been able to make with all of my Celeron systems, and a single PII that I've overclocked at work. Again though, this could be ASUS.
As far as researching the situation before attempting the new parameters, that's how I came to purchase the conductive ink pen. I really did not expect to get into a hairy situation unless I had to unlock the CPU. The jury was still out as to whether I would attempt this anyway, as the Duron 750's performance may have been enough to satisfy me, especially with the new vid card. Again the bridges looked to be connected underneath an admittedly weak magnifying glass, and I figured the locked/unlocked status would be revealed fairly quickly when I tried to change the settings the first time.
Thanks for all the suggestions, I think that most likely the CPU has survived, and I'll follow up here with the results of my attempts to reset the board.