Keysplayr
Elite Member
- Jan 16, 2003
- 21,211
- 50
- 91
Why would those be relevant to the discussion at hand?
Another:
It just makes sense to include them. The more info the better.
You decided to only show the results that backs up your argument the best and that's normal in a debate, but everyone who has been following FuryX launch and reviews knows that FuryX closes the performance gap the higher the resultion. At 1080p, GM200 usually decimates FuryX. Not so at higher resolutions
as FuryX does incredibly well. Still not enough to beat GM200, but closes the gap considerably. So, that said, it would be fair of you to include
the obviously left out higher res benches.
Last edited: