Originally posted by: alien42
Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe
Originally posted by: alien42
Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe
Originally posted by: alien42
Originally posted by: Jumpem
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Why think in such a limited fashion? Hell, the food we eat also might havea lot to do with it.
Because I've never thought food or climate would make a persons skin lighter. People tan, but I've never seen a dark skinned person get pale by staying away from the sun.
uhhh, you do know that we all have lineage that originates in africa right?
Yes but at one time the pre/human population was light skinned. Dark skin was an evolutionary development.. We only theorize that everyone in Africa was black at the time of the journey out.
i would say science shows otherwise but common sense asks when is the last time you saw a
white ape?
Actually science shows exactly what I said. Go shave a monkey.
Dark skin was an evolutionary development after losing hair in response to UV lights affect on folate levels
Also "out of africa" is a theory and although the most accepted not the only one.
national geographics take on this thread
i would say this is good
science
from the nina jablonski page:
"The earliest members of the hominid lineage probably had a mostly unpigmented or lightly pigmented integument covered with dark black hair, similar to that of the modern chimpanzee. The evolution of a naked, darkly pigmented integument occurred early in the evolution of the genus Homo. A dark epidermis protected sweat glands from UV-induced injury, thus insuring the integrity of somatic thermoregulation."
the photo on that page is brilliant. either light skinned modern humans became darker, as did the wrinkles on their feet and hands, or dark skinned humans became lighter and those wrinkles did not change. which makes more sense?