Originally posted by: Robor
Meh, I got a 17. At least I got over 50%! Still don't get 24. Isn't it "13 loaves in a bakers dozen"?
Originally posted by: Robor
Meh, I got a 17. At least I got over 50%! Still don't get 24. Isn't it "13 loaves in a bakers dozen"?
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
That site is registered with bogus information to some company in Bulgaria. It probably will tell you if you're a "genieus" though
The real Mensa is at www.mensa.org. FYI you don't need to be a genius to become a member, just to score at or above the 98th percentile rank on a valid IQ test.
Sadly the benefits aren't even close to those of a Stonecutter.
Originally posted by: Anubis
ive got 16 officially without reading this, and i woudl have 17 however 33 is broken , i put in 15 men on a dead mans chest but it doesnt say its right when i know it is
Originally posted by: Majesty
The true question is: How do you test your true intelligence? Period.
There're so many variants to intelligence. For instance, Kim Peek knows 9000 or so books by heart.
Originally posted by: BigCoolJesus
Originally posted by: Anubis
ive got 16 officially without reading this, and i woudl have 17 however 33 is broken , i put in 15 men on a dead mans chest but it doesnt say its right when i know it is
Yea, it wont work for me either
i got 24 and decided to call it quits
yay for me
Originally posted by: Majesty
I'm stuck at 18 right now...
Finality: Read the fine prints:
Believe it or not, this type of test can be a good estimate of intelligence (if you excuse the cultural bias).
People that did well on this type of test are likely those who are gifted with verbal ability and linguistic pattern recognition.
This sort of assessment would discriminate against those with non-linguistic pattern recognition (like solving jigsaw puzzles)
and spatial intelligence (like the ability to use a map or see hidden figures in a drawing).
Note: My mother-tongue is not english.