I beat the game over the weekend.
This game sort of facinates me, mainly because this game was so unsuspectingly good. I loved AC2, but the new elements like the assiassin recruitment/assistance thing, mid-mission checkpoint system, easier combat and multiplayer are so good.
The funny thing is, when it was over I was kinda sad. I put a lot of time into getting most of the flags, treasures, feathers, glyphs, romulus keys and whatever else is out there and I just got lost in the world. Cheesy, but true.
Deffinitely in my top 5 of the year.
Yeah, ACB has no right to be as damn good as it is. A little something was missing from AC2 to make me want to exhaust every little bit of game out of it, but something about ACB made me want to renovate every little thing, and do every side quest. Whereas the first game had you doing the same bland thing over and over again, the second one had you mix it up, the third really made sure there was some sort of twist to each mission, so it never really got boring.
Ubisoft has a particular style of making games - make one game, then the next year put out the B-reel with the same engine and nearly the same assets, slightly improved mechanics but slightly blander, less interesting missions. See: Rainbox six vegas 1/2, Graw 1/2, Hawx 1/2, Prince of Persia, Splinter cell etc...
Except AC:B breaks the mold. Its technically better, and more interesting on top of it.
But its really a continuation of AC2. You really need to play AC2 to get the most out of it. Anyone new to the series can and should skip AC1, as its really not a great game. The story was still good, and you can make an argument for rushing through the single player and skipping anything secondary. But you need to at least play AC2.