Benchmarks for UT 2003

[Furor]

1600x1200
Flyby: 63
Botwatch: 49

1024x768
Flyby: 154
Botwatch: 64

800x600
Flyby: 182
Botwatch: 71


Athlon XP @ 202x9.5, GF4 Ti4200(30.82 drivers) stock atm..fresh install of windows xp, haven't had time to install rivatuner..

Re-ran 1600x1200 at 300/615 speeds..

Flyby: 71
Botwatch: 51

 

[Uclagamer_99]

is everyone using the 40.41s?

 

[Imported]

System:
P4 1.8A@2520 (18x140)
256MB RDRAM
Ti4200 at 280/560
Windows XP

640x960
Flyby : 195.261230
Botmatch : 65.785942

800x600
Flyby : 181.230774
Botmatch : 65.824554

1024x768
Flyby : 135.641998
Botmatch : 65.037598

1280x960
Flyby : 94.447289
Botmatch : 59.385132

1600x1200
Flyby : 63.707359
Botmatch : 46.158619

 

[notfred]

It seems that much of ATOT has neglected thier sacasm detectors, instead choosing to invest in fast video cards. Note: before your next vid card upgrade, consider getting a better sarcasm detector. Many of you need one.

 

[Haircut]

I'm downloading now.

System is Athlon @ 1466 MHz
GeForce 2 Ti.
512 Megs PC133.

I know it's going to suck bad

 

[FrancesBeansRevenge]

Flyby: 162.452118
Botmatch: 71.316666
Resolution: 1024x768


P4 2.26@2.72
512MB XMS3000 @ 426DDR CAS 2
Triplex GF4 Ti4600

 

[FSUpaintball]

Can't wait to run these benchmarks.

 

[Don Vito Corleone]

P4 1.6A at 2.133
Visiontek GF3ti200 at 225/450
512 MB Samsung PC2700 DDR

1600x1200x32 (I swear I could hear my video card gently sobbing on this one):
Flyby 49.11
Botmatch 35.38

1280x960x32:
Flyby 70.76
Botmatch 47.16

1024x768x32:
Flyby 102.90
Botmatch 54.39

800x600x32:
Flyby 142.75
Botmatch 55.91

640x480x32:
Flyby 163.09
Botmatch 55.91

 

[dethman]

AMD Tbird 1.0@1.33.
GF3Ti200 @ 220, 500
512 Crucial SDRAM


1024x768x32
Flyby 102
Bot 40

edit: made mistake entering bot score.

 

[Chaotic42]

Dual Athlon MP 1800+
768 MB Registered ECC PC2100
80GB Western Digital Special Edition
Gainward Geforce4 Ti4400

1600x1200x32

Fly By- 65
Botwatch- 36

 

[FSUpaintball]

Ran the benchmarks, satisfied.

Abit KG7-RAID with Athlon T-bird 1.4
256MB DDR Crucial RAM
VisionTek Xtasy GF4 TI4200 128MB at 275/500
Win XP Pro


Here's the benchmarks:

640x480
FLyby: 124
Botmatch: 40

800x600
Flyby: 124
Botmatch: 40

1024x768
Flyby: 115
Botmatch: 40

1280x960
Flyby: 93
Botmatch: 40

1600x1200
Flyby: 89
Botmatch: 40


The botmatch numbers are obviously being limited by my processor/RAM, and not my video card. I wonder how those numbers would do with a faster CPU.

 

[railer]

1024x768:

Flyby:122
Botmatch: 46

Athlon 1600@2000(unlocked)
Radeon 8500 64 MB: 281/306 catalyst 2.2's.

 

[railer]

Dethman...

Either your bot score is way wrong...or this is the gayest benchmark ever...

 

[LordMaul]

Wow! I suck!

800x600
flyby: 91
botmatch: 32

dual 1ghz p3s and a geforce 3 ti200. *whine*

 

[blurredvision]

I can't get the Benchmark.exe to work. Says it can't find the ut2003.exe!! But anyways, I used the demos in the Benchmark folder, and here are the results I got:

System specs:

Athlon XP 1800+
512 DDR PC2100
GeForce Ti4400
KT333 chipset

Fly-Bys

ctf-citadel
20.952103 / 98.702522 / 243.584442 fps
Score = 98.897446

dm-asbestos
24.476774 / 136.551758 / 391.549011 fps
Score = 136.686401

dm-antalus
18.247845 / 87.054039 / 283.028442 fps
Score = 87.075714

Bot Matches

ctf-citadel
16.572237 / 39.599186 / 85.797943 fps
Score = 39.653976

dm-asbestos
18.578527 / 42.276848 / 114.843018 fps
Score = 42.299538

br-anubis
18.527281 / 52.950695 / 117.587715 fps
Score = 52.954674

dm-antalus
18.639050 / 35.923382 / 72.579369 fps
Score = 35.939770



Not too bad results I don't guess.

 

[RGN]

Originally posted by: HenHowC
P4 1.8A@2.4 133FSB
ASUS P4B266-C Bios 1005c
Crucial 512MB 2100DDR
Visiontek GF4 Ti4200 O/C 315/560
40.41 Dets (read that the demo has problems with this driver set and works better with 30.82s)

1024x768 Res w/ texture sharpening enabled
Flyby 87.25
BotMatch 52.9

1024x768 Res w/o texture sharpening
Flyby 148.55
BotMatch 57.88

what scares me is the fact that the textures aren't hi-res...does this mean our fps are gonna drop even more in the full version?!

My RIG is similar, scores almost identical:
Abit IT7MAX
P4 2.0A->2.4
1GB PC2100
GF3 @default clock

 

[Shagga]

P4 2.4B
ASUS P4T533-C BIOS version 1007 Final
1GB Infineon PC800 RIMMS
GeForce 3 (Original) Not Overclocked (200/460)
nVidia 30.82 Detonators

1024x768x32
Flyby: 98.87
Bots: 57.06

[edit]

Added a bit for spec..

 

[nitrousninja]

1600 x 1200 everything maxed.

br-anubis
17.274334 / 62.025536 / 110.284920 fps
Score = 62.059822

ctf-citadel
10.058180 / 47.779831 / 100.332390 fps
Score = 47.818924

dm-asbestos
38.523125 / 137.922195 / 459.505920 fps
Score = 138.021545

dm-antalus
9.125751 / 41.877155 / 79.940498 fps
Score = 41.881947

dm-asbestos
23.348242 / 46.696407 / 81.209518 fps
Score = 46.709217

dm-antalus
9.930720 / 95.389610 / 345.966095 fps
Score = 95.397995

ctf-citadel
13.273486 / 99.894936 / 320.745117 fps
Score = 99.933052

 

[BD2003]

Do the ingame options have any effect on benchmark scores?

 

[boi]

Flyby 155.271341
Botmatch 67.572652

1024x768


p4 2.4 @ 2.688GHz(112FSB) 1.7v

Geforce4 4600 stock

Samsung pc2700 512mb @ 187.5MHz 2-3-3-6

 

[jlarsson]

p4 1.7@1.7
384 mb pc800
Geforce 2 ultra 64mb


640x480
flyby 113
bot 40

800x600
flyby 93
bot 39

1600x1200 - just for the hell of it
flyby 29
bot 21

I just ordered an Ati Radeon 9700 pro...can't wait for that to come in.

 

[Freejack2]

I gotta be doing something wrong.

P4 2.53 @ 2.8ghz
Geforce 4 TI4600 128mb (unoverclocked)
1024mb ddr ram 148/296

800x600
Flyby: 183.964
Botmatch: 63.181

1024x768
Flyby: 155.625
Botmatch: 63.108

1280x964 (lcd doesn't do 1600x1200)
Flyby: 111.269
Botmatch: 59.289

 

[transluko]

Athlon 650
GForce 3 TI-200
~400MB ram

Res: 1280x960

Flyby: 43.1
Botmatch: 15.0

 

[Uclagamer_99]

1600 x 1200 everything maxed.

i was gonna pee in my pants until i saw you have a radeon 9700 -_-

 

[boi]

This sucks, I can't even max out the settings with my g4 4600 @ 1280x960 =(