poofyhairguy
Lifer
- Nov 20, 2005
- 14,612
- 318
- 126
But they ALL still use the same OS. How on earth does Android encourage innovative when I'm getting the same software experience from device to device (other than perhaps a different skin)?
Two things:
1. If the hardware is different then the software experience is different. If I don't have a fingerprint reader, I can't use my fingerprint for passwords in apps.
2. The "skins" as you put it are hugely different experiences. Touchwiz looks as different from the OS on the Nexus as it does iOS. Or heck one of those Chinese phones skinned to look like iOS are much closer to the iPhone. The only real similarity in Android is the Play Store.
You focus too much on hardware, which hasn't been of much concern for many years now.
You say that, but hardware is still driving the bus. How come my iPad Air 2 will do split screen but the iPad Air 1 or the iPhone 6+ can't? Because the difference in the hardware (namely 2GB of RAM). It still matters, even in iOS.
What's severely lacking is software innovation
Lets break down that statement shall we?
Which OS allows for competing app stores, iOS or Android? The answer is Android.
Which OS was the first to allow split screen app use on a mobile device? Once again the answer is Android, Samsung in particular.
Which OS allowed you to use third party keyboards first? Android again.
Which OS had a notification shade, or widgets, or quick toggles first? Android, Android, Android.
Which ecosystem had a watch OS first? Android
Which ecosystem has VR support first? Android.
Seems to me that Android is leading the way on mobile software innovation.
I guess you could say innovation would be greater without Android, but I would disagree. Android allows many mobile device makers to standardize on apps so the focus can be elsewhere. Without that unified app marketplace a lot of R&D intended for "innovation" would be spent trying to cross that divide, like whatever resources Blackberry wasted to get their phones to run Android apps.
You may wish to reasses your priorities when it comes to buying smartphones and stop focussing so much on hardware features and instead look at software, which is the most important aspect of our modern consumer electronics devices.
I honestly can't think of a SINGLE example the last couple of years where Apple has innovated in SOFTWARE. Sure they roll out more refined versions of what Android has- Apple Pay has more retailer support, or the Apple Watch is less beta than Android Wear was last year- but I don't see that being innovative. That is being derivative. Yet you say someone like me is standing is the way of innovation, when I bought a Wear Watch before ANY Apple person could buy an Apple Watch.
I think you need to re-evaluate your perspective if you think Apple is some amazing software innovator in this segment. Ever since Steve died it has been one safe play after another, with the biggest innovation/choice being what color watch band to buy. Hell, iOS's whole look- the flat UI since iOS 7- is just following the industry trend of UIs going flat because of Windows Mobile. Tell me, how could Android rip all the innovation out of the market if third place can influence first place like that?
I think you overstate both the positive impact of Apple and the negative impact of Android.