Generator
Senior member
- Mar 4, 2005
- 793
- 0
- 0
Most of you people can't see the forest for the trees. Both of these games aren't suited for the hopped up, consumer devouring dopes that play games. Especially shooters, I mean look at this comment...
Thats the nature of sequel man. Do you just not get it? Bioshock 2 was continuance of the original Bioshock. Is this serious criticism?
Regardless new Bioshock coming, one in the sky! Something new, something fresh, something to consume!
Back to the question though I thought both were great games. First one dragged a bit and I welcomed the end. Sequel has vast improvements in gameplay that for me added replay value. Environment of Rapture was something unto itself. Then there is the storyline. I mean what game even comes close in trying to tell such tragic and depraved story? Just Cause 2? BioShock deserves credit for trying at the very least.
it was just too much of the same core game as Bioshock.
Thats the nature of sequel man. Do you just not get it? Bioshock 2 was continuance of the original Bioshock. Is this serious criticism?
Regardless new Bioshock coming, one in the sky! Something new, something fresh, something to consume!
Back to the question though I thought both were great games. First one dragged a bit and I welcomed the end. Sequel has vast improvements in gameplay that for me added replay value. Environment of Rapture was something unto itself. Then there is the storyline. I mean what game even comes close in trying to tell such tragic and depraved story? Just Cause 2? BioShock deserves credit for trying at the very least.