yllus
Elite Member & Lifer
- Aug 20, 2000
- 20,577
- 432
- 126
Hmm, this is one of the more interesting questions posed here in quite some time.
On the one hand, you have the wilful misrepresentation by Cohen to these people with what they were filming and how they would appear in said film. Be it for a serious purpose or for comedy, at first thought I consider it pretty wrong to use the ignorance of a person against them like a weapon - with the end result being ridiculed in front of thousands or millions of people. This is quite different then when Jay Leno walks around and asks the dumbest of the dumb simple questions they should know the answer to:
On the other hand, you have the issue of redress. Isn't there some standard pay rate for actors they could reimburse those who appeared in the film with? That neatly avoids capitalizing on this solely because the film did well.
On the one hand, you have the wilful misrepresentation by Cohen to these people with what they were filming and how they would appear in said film. Be it for a serious purpose or for comedy, at first thought I consider it pretty wrong to use the ignorance of a person against them like a weapon - with the end result being ridiculed in front of thousands or millions of people. This is quite different then when Jay Leno walks around and asks the dumbest of the dumb simple questions they should know the answer to:
Whether the end result does a good job at enteraining us or not, I think it's fairly indisputable that that was done wrongly, possibly even cruelly.Mr Tudorache, a deeply religious grandfather who lost his arm in an accident, was one of those who feels most humiliated. For one scene, a rubber sex toy in the shape of a fist was attached to the stump of his missing arm - but he had no idea what it was.
Only when The Mail on Sunday visited him did he find out. He said he was ashamed, confessing that he only agreed to be filmed because he hoped to top up his £70-a-month salary - although in the end he was paid just £3.
He invited us into his humble home and brought out the best food and drink his family had. Visibly disturbed, he said shakily: 'Someone from the council said these Americans need a man with no arm for some scenes. I said yes but I never imagined the whole country, or even the whole world, will see me in the cinemas ridiculed in this way. This is disgusting.
On the other hand, you have the issue of redress. Isn't there some standard pay rate for actors they could reimburse those who appeared in the film with? That neatly avoids capitalizing on this solely because the film did well.