Browser tab management

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
59,238
9,744
126
Opera's Chinese owned.

edit:
It's also chromium. Might as well use chrome.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,253
9,863
136
Opera's Chinese owned.

edit:
It's also chromium. Might as well use chrome.
I don't even know what I'm using on my XP machines. Basically I don't browse with them! They have very specific targeted usage, and rare these days as well. Don't need internet access!
 
Reactions: igor_kavinski
Jul 27, 2020
25,096
17,452
146
This is why I hate Firefox:



Only 106 tabs open but ironically the Ars Technica M4 iPad Pro review tab was consuming 10+ GB all by itself.

Samsung 860 EVO 500GB SSD was TOTALLY overrun, almost like Firefox ran it over ruthlessly and mercilessly. System froze. I thought the CPU fan had failed or something and the system had crashed. But patiently waiting for several minutes paid off and I was able to regain control and take the screenshot. Saved tabs to bookmarks and closed them all. The review article was open in a different Firefox window so that's how I found out it was using the most RAM. Unfortunately, within seconds, it started lowering its consumption and went down to about 4400MB. Still huge but not worth taking a screenshot of.

So yeah. Even a decent PCIe 3.0 TLC SSD would've helped a lot in this situation.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
59,238
9,744
126
Maybe your problem is windows. I don't get behavior like that on debian.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
59,238
9,744
126
Dunno about that. I'm using a basically stock dell refurb with a gen4 I5 cpu, and 12gb ram. No gfx card.

edit:
 
Last edited:
Reactions: igor_kavinski
Dec 10, 2005
27,704
12,159
136
This is why I hate Firefox:

View attachment 99188

Only 106 tabs open but ironically the Ars Technica M4 iPad Pro review tab was consuming 10+ GB all by itself.

Samsung 860 EVO 500GB SSD was TOTALLY overrun, almost like Firefox ran it over ruthlessly and mercilessly. System froze. I thought the CPU fan had failed or something and the system had crashed. But patiently waiting for several minutes paid off and I was able to regain control and take the screenshot. Saved tabs to bookmarks and closed them all. The review article was open in a different Firefox window so that's how I found out it was using the most RAM. Unfortunately, within seconds, it started lowering its consumption and went down to about 4400MB. Still huge but not worth taking a screenshot of.

So yeah. Even a decent PCIe 3.0 TLC SSD would've helped a lot in this situation.
Idk, sounds like a you problem. 106 tabs open... Maybe just read stuff and close them, or learn to bookmark.
 
Jul 27, 2020
25,096
17,452
146
Idk, sounds like a you problem.
I think you overlooked the fact that a single tab was consuming 10 GB RAM. Consumed RAM reached 98% and Firefox started thrashing the SSD at a crazy rate, revealing the weakness of Samsung's SSD. So I learned two things today. Be careful opening and leaving ArsTechnica tabs on Firefox and Samsung EVO SSDs are crap at handling anything above a typical home or office workload.
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
59,238
9,744
126
I keep ars in a pinned tab, both at home and work. My work machine only gets rebooted for necessary updates, so I have firefox uptimes of a month or more.
 
Jul 27, 2020
25,096
17,452
146
Yeah, first time this has happened with an ARS tab for me too. Not gonna take any chances next time. Probably some stupid ads or something.
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,008
3,764
136
This is why I hate Firefox:

View attachment 99188

Only 106 tabs open but ironically the Ars Technica M4 iPad Pro review tab was consuming 10+ GB all by itself.

Samsung 860 EVO 500GB SSD was TOTALLY overrun, almost like Firefox ran it over ruthlessly and mercilessly. System froze. I thought the CPU fan had failed or something and the system had crashed. But patiently waiting for several minutes paid off and I was able to regain control and take the screenshot. Saved tabs to bookmarks and closed them all. The review article was open in a different Firefox window so that's how I found out it was using the most RAM. Unfortunately, within seconds, it started lowering its consumption and went down to about 4400MB. Still huge but not worth taking a screenshot of.

So yeah. Even a decent PCIe 3.0 TLC SSD would've helped a lot in this situation.
This happens to me about once a month; usually I can close the offending tab and save the session but not always. It's less of a problem after I upgraded from 16GB to 32GB of RAM last fall but it still happens if I have other memory-hungry apps running, and some browser tab causes a runaway situation. I'd guesstimate I usually have around 100 browser tabs, but most are unloaded.

My OS is Linux and what happens when a browser tab runs amok is there's extreme memory pressure that causes heavy swapping. It probably could be worse but my swap file is relatively small at 2GB; so if the memory pressure isn't relieved, Linux's OOM killer will kick in and randomly evict some process. This wasn't well tuned when Ubuntu 22.04 was released*, but seems to be normal-ish now. I don't manually tune the OOM killer, which sometimes makes sense for an application server.

FWIW this degenerate behavior can happen with either Chromium or Firefox, but I mostly prefer using Chromium. I wouldn't blame this on your poor EVO SSD; this is just classic thrashing. I use a (low-end) NVMe SSD, and it still happens once in a while. At least a decade ago, I used Mac OS X on an older system and struggled along with 3GB RAM. (Earlier) Mac Safari had no memory management whatsoever so when it reached a RAM tipping point, the OS would lock up and you couldn't manually kill processes if you tried (meanwhile, iOS was very aggressive at evicting mobile Safari tabs). All you'd see is the classic Mac spinning "beach ball." So I quit using Safari, and Chrome has been my main browser ever since.

You mentioned ads, which is usually the culprit. Ad blocker on that PC?

* Seemed pretty lousy at first (WTF user-space OOM killer on top of the kernel's OOM killer. Fscking Canonical):

 
Last edited:
Reactions: igor_kavinski
Jul 27, 2020
25,096
17,452
146
Ad blocker on that PC?
None. I'm kinda tolerant of ads. Keeps the internet free (mostly). Would hate things going behind paywalls if my using an ad-blocker turns out to be the straw that breaks the camel's back (it usually is. I jinx stuff good!).
 
Jul 27, 2020
25,096
17,452
146
I wouldn't blame this on your poor EVO SSD; this is just classic thrashing. I use a (low-end) NVMe SSD, and it still happens once in a while.
A faster or better SSD would have kept the system responsive at least just enough to let me open Task Manager and figure out what was going on. I've had something similar happen on my browsing laptop but that has a WD Green 240GB SSD so that's to be expected. Samsung SSD's are not cheap so I expect better from them. By the way, I used some HD bench tool that coercitiv uses to test SSD performance. The Samsung 860 EVO actually performed better than a newer 870 EVO SSD so Samsung has cut a few more corners to enrich itself.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
69,976
13,475
126
www.anyf.ca
I would not run a browser without an ad blocker, the internet without an adblocker is pretty much a cesspool now days, it's not like before. Most ads are also malware.
 

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,111
136
I think you overlooked the fact that a single tab was consuming 10 GB RAM. Consumed RAM reached 98% and Firefox started thrashing the SSD at a crazy rate, revealing the weakness of Samsung's SSD. So I learned two things today. Be careful opening and leaving ArsTechnica tabs on Firefox and Samsung EVO SSDs are crap at handling anything above a typical home or office workload.
Sounds like js or something running on that tab had a memory leak. Most I've ever seen if 1.6GB for the whole shebang - but with only 40-50 tabs.
I don't use FF anymore, I use chromium based browsers with Ublock and Marvellous Suspenders - much lower ram usage.
 
Reactions: Grazick
Jul 27, 2020
25,096
17,452
146


How ironic. A site about computer tech doesn't know how to create leak proof web pages. And second place culprit is Ars Technica. Goes to show that even tech enthusiastic websites prefer to hire monkeys to do the job, either because they are impressed when they interview monkeys or because they like to save a few pennies to feed their cats.
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,008
3,764
136
Not sure if it would be revealed in the browser's process list, but I suspect the problem you're seeing are caused by ads.

(But yeah, I use Firefox only for secondary browsing because it doesn't seem quite as good as Chromium.)
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,825
4,386
126
I guess I just don't understand the "logic" of keeping tabs open for more than the task you are working on. On the highly unlikely event that you want to find something later, they are right there in your history. Heck, features like the Grouped History in Chrome even do that part of the work for you. A click or two and you have everything back up -- without the loss of resources, energy drains, system slowdowns, constant bandwidth use from ads, etc.
 
Reactions: Brainonska511

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
59,238
9,744
126
I currently have 46 tabs open, 16 of which are pinned. Of the ones I'm not actively using, the rest are temporary bookmarks. I can get back to them when I want to make the time, and they don't clutter my real bookmarks, or disappear forever when I forget about them. Having them in front of me keeps them in mind. I have no performance problems.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
99,150
17,470
126
I guess I just don't understand the "logic" of keeping tabs open for more than the task you are working on. On the highly unlikely event that you want to find something later, they are right there in your history. Heck, features like the Grouped History in Chrome even do that part of the work for you. A click or two and you have everything back up -- without the loss of resources, energy drains, system slowdowns, constant bandwidth use from ads, etc.
Igor is special.
 
Reactions: igor_kavinski

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,008
3,764
136
I currently have 46 tabs open, 16 of which are pinned. Of the ones I'm not actively using, the rest are temporary bookmarks. I can get back to them when I want to make the time, and they don't clutter my real bookmarks, or disappear forever when I forget about them. Having them in front of me keeps them in mind. I have no performance problems.
This is also how @igor_kavinski and I use browser tabs, although the actual count is different. Over the long run, it does cause excess memory consumption but unless I'm missing something, browser history is not a good facsimile of tabs or bookmarks.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,825
4,386
126
This is also how @igor_kavinski and I use browser tabs, although the actual count is different. Over the long run, it does cause excess memory consumption but unless I'm missing something, browser history is not a good facsimile of tabs or bookmarks.
You haven't done much with Grouped History then. Automatically takes all similar tabs, groups them for you, and then with a click can open them all right back up.

For example, suppose you were shopping for a wax unicorn with a purple tail. All the search results with a wax unicorn with a purple tail are automatically grouped (and no other shopping tabs) and you can bring them all back up nearly instantly so you can price compare at any time in the future.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,253
9,863
136
This is also how @igor_kavinski and I use browser tabs, although the actual count is different. Over the long run, it does cause excess memory consumption but unless I'm missing something, browser history is not a good facsimile of tabs or bookmarks.
Used to drive me nuts but once I went to 32GB RAM, not nuts. Occasionally I do need to restart Chrome, only once in a long while. Doesn't take me long to get tons of pages and megatons of tabs open. Bad habits, mostly. I have a lot of interests, can get off on tangents. I usually have Brave open as well as Chrome for those sites that bug the Bejesus out of you one way or another.

Every time I reboot, I'm asked to upgrade to Windows 11 from 10. I decline every time. Don't know what I'll do when support disappears. I do need to reinstall Windows. Don't know which version I ought to go with. Both my Windows 10 laptops have issues I figure will probably clear with a fresh install, different issues which developed way after I bought them, almost identical laptops.
 
Reactions: igor_kavinski

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
99,150
17,470
126
Used to drive me nuts but once I went to 32GB RAM, not nuts. Occasionally I do need to restart Chrome, only once in a long while. Doesn't take me long to get tons of pages and megatons of tabs open. Bad habits, mostly. I have a lot of interests, can get off on tangents. I usually have Brave open as well as Chrome for those sites that bug the Bejesus out of you one way or another.

Every time I reboot, I'm asked to upgrade to Windows 11 from 10. I decline every time. Don't know what I'll do when support disappears. I do need to reinstall Windows. Don't know which version I ought to go with. Both my Windows 10 laptops have issues I figure will probably clear with a fresh install, different issues which developed way after I bought them, almost identical laptops.
Just create win10 media and reinstall
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |