Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: LongAce
Serving your country in the states vs. serving you country on the battlefield doesn't make one better then the other. Each person has a duty got their country and they all do their best to help this country. The fire fighters, police officers, teachers, engineers, scientist, civil service, soldiers etc. They all do a part in protecting this country. Without each other, we can only last so long before we lose. This has been the downfall of many civilization and mankind.
It doesn't make one better then the other, but IMO it makes one more deserving then the other. He risked everything for his country. The other guy just did his time. Without a defense, the people you speak of would be too busy defending themselves to do their work.
Again, i really think we should put a draft system back in place. Your number gets drawn and your in for 4 years or 6 years or whatever. No exemptions, it doesn't matter who you are.
Why? The volunteer system seems to be working rather well.
Why? Read my sig, that's why.
Care to explain to me how a draft would keep the powerful and elite from gaming the system?
Oviously it couldn't stop it altogether, but it sure as hell would slow it down a lot. Just the fact that we had a draft and some of the congressman's and rich people's children would also be sent into harm's way would have given our leaders a little more patience before starting this war.
That seems simple and logical to me??
I would not count on that happening. We are better served with a volunteer army.