IMO 1A needs to be revised to say something along the lines of protecting one's right to freedom of religious belief but only insofar as one can only make belief-based choices to affect one's own life and no-one else's. At the moment it seems that 1A is being interpreted to allow religious followers to make up random bullshit and force everyone to abide by it otherwise it's infringing on their random bullshit.
IMO ideally the reference to religious belief should simply be removed. The era it was intended for is over (e.g. a monarch tries to enforce their sky-fairy beliefs on their people, tries to eliminate followers of other religions). Without it you simply have a right to believe whatever you want to believe, whether AMD is better than Intel/NVIDIA, ketchup goes in hotdogs, Pink Floyd is better than Taylor Swift, who gives a crap. Having said that, if it was removed, I bet the GQP would have a field day with "wrong religions".