Cheney in hospital.........

[JustAnAverageGuy]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Neither of you think terrorists should be annihilated?

Other people in thread:

"Define terrorist"

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: JustAnAverageGuy

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Neither of you think terrorists should be annihilated?

Other people in thread:

"Define terrorist"

Doesn't change my question

Originally posted by: Gaard

Originally posted by: Infohawk
But what about terrorists? We can still wish death on them right? :brokenheart:

excellent
:thumbsup:

CsG

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: BBond
So yes, I think terrorists should be annihilated. Where do we start?

Thank You.

Where do we start?.... I think we already have...
Now there may be disagreements on where we go from here, but we most definately have started.

CsG

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: BBond
So yes, I think terrorists should be annihilated. Where do we start?

Thank You.

Where do we start?.... I think we already have...
Now there may be disagreements on where we go from here, but we most definately have started.

CsG

Haven't you heard? There was no connection between Iraq and the terrorists that attacked America.
Bush hasn't started facing terrorists. He ignored the threat, then he ignored those who carried out the threat. Now he has America mired in a fiasco that the terrorists' who attacked our nation could only dream of before Bush made it a reality.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: BBond
So yes, I think terrorists should be annihilated. Where do we start?

Thank You.

Where do we start?.... I think we already have...
Now there may be disagreements on where we go from here, but we most definately have started.

CsG

Haven't you heard? There was no connection between Iraq and the terrorists that attacked America.
Bush hasn't started facing terrorists. He ignored the threat, then he ignored those who carried out the threat. Now he has America mired in a fiasco that the terrorists' who attacked our nation could only dream of before Bush made it a reality.

So let me get this straight...we can't touch terrorists that don't touch us? Then you have the nerve to claim the threat was ignored. So what exactly should have been done with this threat you now see in you post 9/11 view? Remember - we can't touch those who haven't touched us(according to your "logic")
Oh, and haven't you heard...we went to Afghanistan. I suppose that is what you call "ignored the threat" :roll:

Keep blaming America(Bush) if you wish though....

Anyway - it most definately has started no matter how hard you try to claim it hasn't.

CsG

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: BBond
So yes, I think terrorists should be annihilated. Where do we start?

Thank You.

Where do we start?.... I think we already have...
Now there may be disagreements on where we go from here, but we most definately have started.

CsG

Haven't you heard? There was no connection between Iraq and the terrorists that attacked America.
Bush hasn't started facing terrorists. He ignored the threat, then he ignored those who carried out the threat. Now he has America mired in a fiasco that the terrorists' who attacked our nation could only dream of before Bush made it a reality.

So let me get this straight...we can't touch terrorists that don't touch us? Then you have the nerve to claim the threat was ignored. So what exactly should have been done with this threat you now see in you post 9/11 view? Remember - we can't touch those who haven't touched us(according to your "logic")
Oh, and haven't you heard...we went to Afghanistan. I suppose that is what you call "ignored the threat" :roll:

Keep blaming America(Bush) if you wish though....

Anyway - it most definately has started no matter how hard you try to claim it hasn't.

CsG

Don't put words in my mouth. I never said we can't 'touch' those who haven't touched us. Bush failed to 'touch' those who planned on 'touching' us. The terrorists that 'touched' us are still roaming Earth free while Bush depletes resources in a nation that not only didn't pose a threat, but as we all now know, couldn't pose a threat even if they wanted to, and they didn't want to.

The threat was ignored. Read Richard Clarke's book. Bush was focused on his version of Star Wars while Osama planned his attack. Bush ignored the warnings from career intelligence officers and went on vacation the month before they struck. After 9/11 Bush's first reaction was to attack Iraq unprovoked. I'll keep blaming Bush because it is his malfeasance that has led us into this quagmire. And please, don't confuse America with Bush.

America(Bush)

I find that incredibly insulting.

You have a very crass way of attempting to twist not only my words but historical fact as well. Your fantasyland version of events won't fly in the face of what is now irrefutable fact. Bush ignored the threat that led to 9/11. Bush ignored capturing the people who were responsible. Bush invaded Iraq unprovoked and in doing so has caused more harm to America than the terrorists he failed to bring to justice.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: BBond
So yes, I think terrorists should be annihilated. Where do we start?

Thank You.

Where do we start?.... I think we already have...
Now there may be disagreements on where we go from here, but we most definately have started.

CsG

Haven't you heard? There was no connection between Iraq and the terrorists that attacked America.
Bush hasn't started facing terrorists. He ignored the threat, then he ignored those who carried out the threat. Now he has America mired in a fiasco that the terrorists' who attacked our nation could only dream of before Bush made it a reality.

So let me get this straight...we can't touch terrorists that don't touch us? Then you have the nerve to claim the threat was ignored. So what exactly should have been done with this threat you now see in you post 9/11 view? Remember - we can't touch those who haven't touched us(according to your "logic")
Oh, and haven't you heard...we went to Afghanistan. I suppose that is what you call "ignored the threat" :roll:

Keep blaming America(Bush) if you wish though....

Anyway - it most definately has started no matter how hard you try to claim it hasn't.

CsG

Don't put words in my mouth. I never said we can't 'touch' those who haven't touched us. Bush failed to 'touch' those who planned on 'touching' us. The terrorists that 'touched' us are still roaming Earth free while Bush depletes resources in a nation that not only didn't pose a threat, but as we all now know, couldn't pose a threat even if they wanted to, and they didn't want to.

The threat was ignored. Read Richard Clarke's book. Bush was focused on his version of Star Wars while Osama planned his attack. Bush ignored the warnings from career intelligence officers and went on vacation the month before they struck. After 9/11 Bush's first reaction was to attack Iraq unprovoked. I'll keep blaming Bush because it is his malfeasance that has led us into this quagmire. And please, don't confuse America with Bush.

America(Bush)

I find that incredibly insulting.

You have a very crass way of attempting to twist not only my words but historical fact as well. Your fantasyland version of events won't fly in the face of what is now irrefutable fact. Bush ignored the threat that led to 9/11. Bush ignored capturing the people who were responsible. Bush invaded Iraq unprovoked and in doing so has caused more harm to America than the terrorists he failed to bring to justice.

You can tell yourself whatever revisionism you wish. Your Blame America attitude is on full display.

CsG

 

[0marTheZealot]

Cheney is fvking Darth Vader. The sooner he dies the better for America and the world. He is truly one of the few people in the world that I fear.

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: BBond
So yes, I think terrorists should be annihilated. Where do we start?

Thank You.

Where do we start?.... I think we already have...
Now there may be disagreements on where we go from here, but we most definately have started.

CsG

Haven't you heard? There was no connection between Iraq and the terrorists that attacked America.
Bush hasn't started facing terrorists. He ignored the threat, then he ignored those who carried out the threat. Now he has America mired in a fiasco that the terrorists' who attacked our nation could only dream of before Bush made it a reality.

So let me get this straight...we can't touch terrorists that don't touch us? Then you have the nerve to claim the threat was ignored. So what exactly should have been done with this threat you now see in you post 9/11 view? Remember - we can't touch those who haven't touched us(according to your "logic")
Oh, and haven't you heard...we went to Afghanistan. I suppose that is what you call "ignored the threat" :roll:

Keep blaming America(Bush) if you wish though....

Anyway - it most definately has started no matter how hard you try to claim it hasn't.

CsG

Don't put words in my mouth. I never said we can't 'touch' those who haven't touched us. Bush failed to 'touch' those who planned on 'touching' us. The terrorists that 'touched' us are still roaming Earth free while Bush depletes resources in a nation that not only didn't pose a threat, but as we all now know, couldn't pose a threat even if they wanted to, and they didn't want to.

The threat was ignored. Read Richard Clarke's book. Bush was focused on his version of Star Wars while Osama planned his attack. Bush ignored the warnings from career intelligence officers and went on vacation the month before they struck. After 9/11 Bush's first reaction was to attack Iraq unprovoked. I'll keep blaming Bush because it is his malfeasance that has led us into this quagmire. And please, don't confuse America with Bush.

America(Bush)

I find that incredibly insulting.

You have a very crass way of attempting to twist not only my words but historical fact as well. Your fantasyland version of events won't fly in the face of what is now irrefutable fact. Bush ignored the threat that led to 9/11. Bush ignored capturing the people who were responsible. Bush invaded Iraq unprovoked and in doing so has caused more harm to America than the terrorists he failed to bring to justice.

You can tell yourself whatever revisionism you wish. Your Blame America attitude is on full display.

CsG

My blame Bush attitude is completely justified. And your jouney in fantasyland is absolute.

 

[Mean MrMustard]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Time to pay the Devil his due!

Shit happens!

 

[Mean MrMustard]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: BBond
So yes, I think terrorists should be annihilated. Where do we start?

Thank You.

Where do we start?.... I think we already have...
Now there may be disagreements on where we go from here, but we most definately have started.

CsG

Haven't you heard? There was no connection between Iraq and the terrorists that attacked America.
Bush hasn't started facing terrorists. He ignored the threat, then he ignored those who carried out the threat. Now he has America mired in a fiasco that the terrorists' who attacked our nation could only dream of before Bush made it a reality.

So let me get this straight...we can't touch terrorists that don't touch us? Then you have the nerve to claim the threat was ignored. So what exactly should have been done with this threat you now see in you post 9/11 view? Remember - we can't touch those who haven't touched us(according to your "logic")
Oh, and haven't you heard...we went to Afghanistan. I suppose that is what you call "ignored the threat" :roll:

Keep blaming America(Bush) if you wish though....

Anyway - it most definately has started no matter how hard you try to claim it hasn't.

CsG

So when would you say, is the full invasion of Saudi Arabia?

Oh wait! ...too much money invested in that country...

...gotta find another scapegoat....


,,,,hmmmm, Syria has a nice ring to it!

 

[csf]

lol fun to see the douchebags gloat.

ps YOU LOST MORONS, DEAL WITH IT

 

[kitkit201]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Time to pay the Devil his due!

 

[DoubleL]

Is Cheney one of your loved ones? Dumbasssssss? Go away troll.

Oh if someone isn't a loved one it is ok to wish they would die, I wish death on no one, If Kerry and Edwards had won I wouldn't lower myself if Edwards went in the hospital- What am I doing typing this like I am talking to adults that would understand, Have a nice day

 

[Infohawk]

Originally posted by: DoubleL
I wish death on no one

What about terrorists and innocent Iraqis?

 

[XZeroII]

It's funny how when Clinton went into the hospital and had surgury, even the republicans wished him well. There wasn't much hostility because he was a human being. Now, Cheny is in the hospital and we see the true nature of the liberals. :|

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Infohawk

Originally posted by: DoubleL
I wish death on no one

What about terrorists and innocent Iraqis?

Yeah, how about an answer....

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Gaard

Originally posted by: Infohawk
But what about terrorists? We can still wish death on them right? :brokenheart:

excellent
:thumbsup:

Neither of you think terrorists should be annihilated?

CsG

CsG

 

[Infohawk]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

I asked first... Save your crickets for doublel. Also, I don't see how your question is relevant to my question... seems like typical csg obfuscation.

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Infohawk

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

I asked first... Save your crickets for doublel. Also, I don't see how your question is relevant to my question... seems like typical csg obfuscation.

I don't care who you asked - it wasn't me so are you going to continue to ignore it?
It's not obfuscation - it's a clarification question. I won't hold my breath waiting for either of you to answer it though...

CsG

 

[Infohawk]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Infohawk

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

I asked first... Save your crickets for doublel. Also, I don't see how your question is relevant to my question... seems like typical csg obfuscation.

I don't care who you asked - it wasn't me so are you going to continue to ignore it?
It's not obfuscation - it's a clarification question. I won't hold my breath waiting for either of you to answer it though...

CsG

What statement were you trying to clarify?

 

[CADsortaGUY]

Originally posted by: Infohawk

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Infohawk

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

I asked first... Save your crickets for doublel. Also, I don't see how your question is relevant to my question... seems like typical csg obfuscation.

I don't care who you asked - it wasn't me so are you going to continue to ignore it?
It's not obfuscation - it's a clarification question. I won't hold my breath waiting for either of you to answer it though...

CsG

What statement were you trying to clarify?

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

Originally posted by: Gaard

Originally posted by: Infohawk
But what about terrorists? We can still wish death on them right? :brokenheart:

excellent
:thumbsup:

Neither of you think terrorists should be annihilated?

CsG

CsG

 

[Infohawk]

Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY

CsG

What statement of mine were you trying to clarify? You said it was a clarification issue. I'm saying it's obfuscation. Your question doesn't really seem to relate to my post... Thus, it doesn't seem like you're trying to clarify anything that I wrote...

 

[DoubleL]

What about terrorists and innocent Iraqis?

Yeah, how about an answer....

But what about terrorists? We can still wish death on them right?

I asked first...

I asked first

I ask again, How old are you guys

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: XZeroII
It's funny how when Clinton went into the hospital and had surgury, even the republicans wished him well. There wasn't much hostility because he was a human being. Now, Cheny is in the hospital and we see the true nature of the liberals. :|

You condemn all based on the comment of one?
Anyway since I'm not a liberal I can't speak for them but for me personally I wouldn't want him to die, just have to resign the position of VP.