Cinebench 11.5 Released

[zokudu]

Not bad on the OpenGL score I don't know why thats so high. Bit low on the CPU side but its ti be expected for 4C/4T

 

[Amused]

Mine:

i920 @ 4GHz GTX 480 stock.

 

[Amused]

Second run. CPU goes up, OpenGL goes down. LOL

 

[Bartman39]

Ok I dont get this...? I7 920 @ 4.0Ghz but only have an HD 5770...?

 

[Amused]

Weird. How are your FPS so high?

 

[Rubycon]

HD5xxx series get very high FPS with this program starting with Cat 10.3 drivers. My 5970 gets 90 fps whereas 2X 480s get 67 fps.

 

[lopri]

I'm disregarding this benchmark tentatively. The GPU numbers were never indicative of anything (can anyone with Cinema 4D verify?) and CPU numbers also don't make sense especially for X6s. (higher than 6 times the speed-up)

 

[richierich1212]

555 @ 4.2GHz:

1055T @ 3.25GHz:

1055T @ 4.3GHz

 

[bryanW1995]

6.44 on all 4 cores with ht @ 3.8 (19x200), 1.32 on one core, ratio 4.88.

 

[bryanW1995]

I'm disregarding this benchmark tentatively. The GPU numbers were never indicative of anything (can anyone with Cinema 4D verify?) and CPU numbers also don't make sense especially for X6s. (higher than 6 times the speed-up)

if they are taking advantage of the "weak" shaders then yes amd gpus should score very well. most newer DC projects do better with amd than nvidia, but older (and less optimized) projects like seti do better with nvidia.

 

[bryanW1995]

7.17 all 4 cores plus ht i7 920 @ 4.2
1.45 single core,
4.95x ratio

all 4 cores @ 4.2 is very similar to richierich's 1055t @ 4.3

 

[ruijorge]

6.03 on i7 920@3.5(167*21)

 

[eelw]

 

[khon]

i5-2500k @ 4.3GHz, XFire 6850s