- Apr 22, 2001
- 44
- 0
- 0
Ok so after just a coupla years, recently I decided to build two new computers. For the sake of familiarity and assuming that combinations I'd used before would have a higher chance of success another time around, I basically chose components from manufacturers -- ASUS, Antec, Maxtor, OCZ -- that I'd had great success with in the past.
Obviously I made a huge mistake. Even choosing the "next generation" in the line of components I'd chosen in the past -- the P5B for the P5AD2, the Antec TX1050B instead of the discontinued 1088AMG, the Antec NeoPower Trio 550watt instead of the older SmartPower 500watt, the Diamondmax 11 instead of Diamondmax10 -- in every single case, I feel this time around that this "next generation" of componentry includes corners cut, cheaper componentry, poorer quality control, and less reliable overall performance.
I had a wave of defective componentry the likes of which I'd never seen before! I built one system where everything eventually worked fine (save the Maxtor drives, I'm never touching anything from that company or their line at Seagate again, after going through no less than SIX Diamondmax drives from two independent sources, ALL of which came up locked-up defective!), but I had failures across the board with the other one.
So I have to ask, given the vast array of manufacturers out there now: if you were putting together a system where you didn't want to cut corners and were willing to pay extra for quality, reliability and good QC, who would you choose these days for Intel-based motherboard, power supply, case and hard drive manufacturers? Who comes up with consistently good results and seems to have the right kind of quality approach to their design and manufacture?
This seems to be a growing problem and not just with PCs; we're seeing a proliferation of crap manufacture in consumer goods in lots of different areas, and it's not just the "internet whine" effect, a dismissal I used to make myself.
Thoughts? Comments? Recommendations? Thanks! I know I'm steering clear of ASUS, Antec and Maxtor in the future in any event, too bad.
Obviously I made a huge mistake. Even choosing the "next generation" in the line of components I'd chosen in the past -- the P5B for the P5AD2, the Antec TX1050B instead of the discontinued 1088AMG, the Antec NeoPower Trio 550watt instead of the older SmartPower 500watt, the Diamondmax 11 instead of Diamondmax10 -- in every single case, I feel this time around that this "next generation" of componentry includes corners cut, cheaper componentry, poorer quality control, and less reliable overall performance.
I had a wave of defective componentry the likes of which I'd never seen before! I built one system where everything eventually worked fine (save the Maxtor drives, I'm never touching anything from that company or their line at Seagate again, after going through no less than SIX Diamondmax drives from two independent sources, ALL of which came up locked-up defective!), but I had failures across the board with the other one.
So I have to ask, given the vast array of manufacturers out there now: if you were putting together a system where you didn't want to cut corners and were willing to pay extra for quality, reliability and good QC, who would you choose these days for Intel-based motherboard, power supply, case and hard drive manufacturers? Who comes up with consistently good results and seems to have the right kind of quality approach to their design and manufacture?
This seems to be a growing problem and not just with PCs; we're seeing a proliferation of crap manufacture in consumer goods in lots of different areas, and it's not just the "internet whine" effect, a dismissal I used to make myself.
Thoughts? Comments? Recommendations? Thanks! I know I'm steering clear of ASUS, Antec and Maxtor in the future in any event, too bad.