Cryptocoin Mining?

Page 154 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Binky

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,046
4
81
how is it bs? I didn't say you can't make a profit but the way you guys are doing it and their are risks.

if you haven't even paid off your cards that is not a profit.

so your cards aren't paid off and you are getting a big bill each month.

how is that a good anything?

I am sure there are some people on this site who work in computer stores or with big companies and can leave there computer there to mine. now that is smart thinking.
I don't think you understand much about bitcoins.
 

Zargon

Lifer
Nov 3, 2009
12,218
2
76
I'm hundreds up. Now is certainly riskier with difficulty where it is

I pay less than 6cents per kwh
 
Last edited:

MeldarthX

Golden Member
May 8, 2010
1,026
0
76
My card is paid for and then some; allowing me to pick up 7950; for basically 22 to 70 quid......which if I keep both cards....mine out say .20.....coins a day *rough est*

5 days I have 1 coin.....10 days.......2 coins......15 days, 3 coins.......20 days 4 coins....at current prices...almost enough for another 7950 ......

yes the difficultly will increase but another card.....keep things running - this only works with electricity is cheap or built into your bills.....
 

BoFox

Senior member
May 10, 2008
689
0
0
I think that there's an interesting correlation between the Bitcoin value and the network hash rate.

Right now, it's going up at a very steep rate (over 50 Thps, which is about 2x more than exactly one month ago), and so is the value.

But once the global hash rate is no longer so steep, I expect the bubble to pop. The steepness is adding hot air to the balloon, letting it fly over really high mountains, but once it goes over, don't expect it to stay so high.

It seems that $40 is probably what it would be at for the long term. $10 for most of 2H 2012, and then $70 now? That's some serious bubble..

I'll just ride out the steep increase in mining rate, and then BAM! Sell them and use the money to buy NV stock, I guess!!

After all, if we consider the sum total value of all bitcoins mined thus far (10 million times $70), that's $700 million. $700M for something that can not really be used in the economy yet.. That's a LOT of hot air right there.

Just like Apple being valued at $700b, then now back to $400b right where it belongs.. Push it upwards, and let go... it will continue going up a bit by itself (due to the inertia force), and then come back down to where it belongs.
 

MeldarthX

Golden Member
May 8, 2010
1,026
0
76
I think that there's an interesting correlation between the Bitcoin value and the network hash rate.

Right now, it's going up at a very steep rate (over 50 Thps, which is about 2x more than exactly one month ago), and so is the value.

But once the global hash rate is no longer so steep, I expect the bubble to pop. The steepness is adding hot air to the balloon, letting it fly over really high mountains, but once it goes over, don't expect it to stay so high.

It seems that $40 is probably what it would be at for the long term. $10 for most of 2H 2012, and then $70 now? That's some serious bubble..

I'll just ride out the steep increase in mining rate, and then BAM! Sell them and use the money to buy NV stock, I guess!!

After all, if we consider the sum total value of all bitcoins mined thus far (10 million times $70), that's $700 million. $700M for something that can not really be used in the economy yet.. That's a LOT of hot air right there.

Just like Apple being valued at $700b, then now back to $400b right where it belongs.. Push it upwards, and let go... it will continue going up a bit by itself (due to the inertia force), and then come back down to where it belongs.

Not in the economy? I've bought several games with bitcoins; stand alone and steam games....

I know a lot of places you can use bit coins to get hardware....the list isn't huge but it grows every day - so to day they are not part of the economy is false.....
 

Chiropteran

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2003
9,811
110
106
Not in the economy? I've bought several games with bitcoins; stand alone and steam games....

I know a lot of places you can use bit coins to get hardware....the list isn't huge but it grows every day - so to day they are not part of the economy is false.....

https://www.bitcoinstore.com/ Is huge, tons of computers and hardware for sale via bitcoins.

I'm sad I missed the dip last night, would have bought more bitcoins when value went below $60. As it is I think I'll buy a couple at $65 out of my speculation funds, but would have been nicer to get them for $55. Oh well.
 

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
Honest question:

I haven't mind in over a year, so not sure if it's *too* late to get back in.

I'm seriously debating buying a second HD 7970 for my gaming needs, but figured why not put both cards to work *IF* they can return a profit.

I believe I'm paying 12kw/h right now, but with the cool whether coming in, I won't expect to use much electricity since my house is electric (I budget ~$300 a month for electricity since my winters are harsh and I use the system from my electricity company to lock me in on the average of the prior year (which means during the summer I use about $120 worth but still pay $300 but during the winter I can use about $450 but still pay $300.)

Anyways TL;DR:
2x7970, with current difficulties @ $0.14kw/h - is it worth mining?
 
Last edited:

philipma1957

Golden Member
Jan 8, 2012
1,714
0
76
Honest question:

I haven't mind in over a year, so not sure if it's *too* late to get back in.

I'm seriously debating buying a second HD 7970 for my gaming needs, but figured why not put both cards to work *IF* they can return a profit.

I believe I'm paying 12kw/h right now, but with the cool whether coming in, I won't expect to use much electricity since my house is electric (I budget ~$300 a month for electricity since my winters are harsh and I use the system from my electricity company to lock me in on the average of the prior year (which means during the summer I use about $120 worth but still pay $300 but during the winter I can use about $450 but still pay $300.)

Anyways TL;DR:
2x7970, with current difficulties @ $0.14kw/h - is it worth mining?

Here in the states if we do monthly budget for heat 200 usd a month once a year they settle. By settle they say you paid us 200 x 12 = 2400 for the year you really used 2576 or 2256 (the real amount).

If your contract does this then you will save money.


The power used from your normal heating gives 0 hash.

The power used to hash your coins 500 watts an hour would give the same heat that your heater gives so all you power to hash is free.

(more or less accurate) ONLY IF YOUR MONTHLY CONTRACT SETTLES OR ADJUSTS ONCE A YEAR OR SO>

most likely it does if it does not you could hash 50000 burn tons of power and tell them my contract is for 300 a month. Since you live in a different part of the world I can only give a USA setup not a below the equator setup for heating/power contracts

The 2x 7970 will run about 400 to 500 watts an hour.

at 500 watts that is 12k watts a day. or 360 kwatts a month.



you would make 100 usd a month

I used 1100 hash which 2x 7970's can do.

I used 500 watts

I used 12 cents a k-watt

I used 7,000,000 for difficulty

I used 60 usd a coin

https://bitclockers.com/calc


this does not count your heat savings. If you like to game it is kind of worthwhile.
 
Last edited:

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
Here in the states if we do monthly budget for heat 200 usd a month once a year they settle. By settle they say you paid us 200 x 12 = 2400 for the year you really used 2576 or 2256 (the real amount).

If your contract does this then you will save money.

The 2x 7970 will run about 400 to 500 watts an hour.

at 500 watts that is 12k watts a day. or 360 kwatts a month.



you would make 100 usd a month

I used 1100 hash which 2x 7970's can do.

I used 500 watts

I used 12 cents a k-watt

I used 7,000,000 for difficulty

I used 60 usd a coin

https://bitclockers.com/calc


this does not count your heat savings. If you like to game it is kind of worthwhile.

Thanks for the response. I've been on the fence for a second Radeon for a while now.

Guess I'll just take the lunge. Maybe stretch out my current rig another year or two before my usual 2 year overhaul.

/faceplam for not mining since I upgraded from my Radeon HD 5870 (about when I stopped mining.) Could have paid off my next rig and then some.

Oh hindsight.
 

Brekyrself

Senior member
Sep 29, 2008
330
0
71
www.swapwheels.com
Honest question:

I haven't mind in over a year, so not sure if it's *too* late to get back in.

I'm seriously debating buying a second HD 7970 for my gaming needs, but figured why not put both cards to work *IF* they can return a profit.

I believe I'm paying 12kw/h right now, but with the cool whether coming in, I won't expect to use much electricity since my house is electric (I budget ~$300 a month for electricity since my winters are harsh and I use the system from my electricity company to lock me in on the average of the prior year (which means during the summer I use about $120 worth but still pay $300 but during the winter I can use about $450 but still pay $300.)

Anyways TL;DR:
2x7970, with current difficulties @ $0.14kw/h - is it worth mining?

With the difficulty going up, you may not break even on purchasing the 2nd card for 6+ months. Then again if your in Bitcoin for the long term, do not pay attention to the short term gains/losses.
 

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
With the difficulty going up, you may not break even on purchasing the 2nd card for 6+ months. Then again if your in Bitcoin for the long term, do not pay attention to the short term gains/losses.

Well, bitcoin wasn't factoring into the second card. I got some OT today (and would get about ~$350 after taxes) and to me OT money is always "go buy something you don't need but want" money. So second Radeon was specifically for gaming then another friend told me coins were peaking at $70. So I just wanted to see if it was even worth setting the cards up to mine when they aren't gaming.

The cost of the card isn't a factor me, more so this would be icing on the "welps, I bought another card just for 2 games (Crysis3/TR)".
 

wbynum

Senior member
Jul 14, 2005
302
0
0
Yea, if you are buying the second card for gaming and bitcoining then go for it. If only for mining then I would think twice. As you know from mining in the past, the noise can be annoying. With that said though, a 7970x2 rig running 24/7 can help keep a closed room heated in the winter.

I personally kick myself for not mining for over a year. Got into it heavily for a few months in summer of 2011 then bailed when the bubble burst. Did not get back into mining until the beginning of Oct 2012 with two 7970's and two 7950's. Cost of the 4 cards was roughly ~$1200 (already had the other parts). As of this posting, I have grossed ~$1150 but spent ~$350 on electricity. Of course if I had saved all the coins since Oct and sold them now I would be sitting pretty. Hind sight is always 20/20 though.
 

Chiropteran

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2003
9,811
110
106
Right now, mining is easy money, but difficulty is set to adjust upwards in a day or so and that will not improve the situation.

Personally, I have every card I have available working at mining, but I wouldn't dream of spending money on a card for mining purposes, very doubtful it would ever make back it's cost. On the other hand, if I needed a new card for a computer anyway, I would try to get one that can also do some mining on the side.
 

MeldarthX

Golden Member
May 8, 2010
1,026
0
76
Which pools do people mine now; I've been using bitcoinpool.com....

also which miner; as I'm on phoenix miner 1.7
 

chimaxi83

Diamond Member
May 18, 2003
5,457
63
101
Which pools do people mine now; I've been using bitcoinpool.com....

also which miner; as I'm on phoenix miner 1.7

I've been using BTC Guild and GUIMiner, they've given me no issues. I've also tried the Bitminter client, seems cool, no issues there either.
 

philipma1957

Golden Member
Jan 8, 2012
1,714
0
76
Right now, mining is easy money, but difficulty is set to adjust upwards in a day or so and that will not improve the situation.

Personally, I have every card I have available working at mining, but I wouldn't dream of spending money on a card for mining purposes, very doubtful it would ever make back it's cost. On the other hand, if I needed a new card for a computer anyway, I would try to get one that can also do some mining on the side.

yeah I am pushing 12 gpus around 6Gh.

the difficulty really jumped close to 7 million, the next month of mining will be very interesting .

BFL will :

A) produce
B) fold
C) delay.
D) scandal they are caught holding asic gear to mine.

Avalon will :

A)ship the next 300 pieces
B) hold them and mine
C) scandal they are caught holding second batch of asic gear to mine


Asic miner:

A) just keeps mining and paying stock holders
B) a scandal that shows they are hiding many Th in the unknown part of the pools


the bitcoin development team may decide to:

A) let the asic mess sort itself out
B) ban any worker that can mine at a fast rate (ie Asics) for a month or two to allow more people to own them. Why? the network depends on multiple users not a few with big guns


Not done Amd :

1)announces 8000 series will have a turbo /super boost for asic mining while you sleep vs using the gpu to do gaming


any or all of the above:

A) drives coins to 100 usd plus
B) crashes coins to 10 USD
C) creates more demand for asic competition bringing in NVIDIA

D) does nothing much and coins kind of meander along in the 60 to 80 dollar range as difficulty slowly rises due to increased hash power.

OF COURSE EVERYTHING ABOVE COULD BE WRONG AND SOMETHING ELSE HAPPENS. THAT will make for a very interesting Month.
 

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,386
32
91
All this talk about bubbles, does this look like a bubble to anyone else?

No, that looks like debt. You understand that debt is the opposite of positive value, right?

That would be an interesting "bubble":

"Can I borrow $1000?"
"Sure."
"Can I borrow another $1000?"
"Sure."
"Can I borrow another $1000?"
"Sure."
"Do you want me to pay you back now?"
"No, your debt got too high. I just don't see it being worth $3000 anymore. I'm sorry, but the most I can take is $100."

All this talk about conventional wisdom and stocks and such I think misses a basic point: bitcoins are not stocks, and they aren't precious metals. They are unique in many ways, and their uniqueness gives them clear advantages. The total number of coins ever being a known quantity is one such advantage,

So, pretty much the same as stocks and precious metals.

and the free and "fair" distribution system through mining is another huge advantage,

A tiny percentage and meaningless when the inflationary period ends, which is where stocks are and precious metals pretty much are: if you want them, you have to pay for them.
So again, the same.

and lack of any real singular central power like a CEO equivalent is yet another.

Except a few large wallets hold the majority of bitcoins, like the majority of gold is held by central depositories. And stock ownership isn't controlled by a central authority.
So again, no advantage.


Also, every time I try to cash some money out, or add money to my account to buy more bitcoins, I realized what a huge pain in the neck the process is. Despite this huge hassle and annoyance, bitcoins are flourishing.

Oh, you mean like cashing out stocks or precious metals?
Sure, can't be a bubble, because it's "different!"

I think that there's an interesting correlation between the Bitcoin value and the network hash rate. Right now, it's going up at a very steep rate (over 50 Thps, which is about 2x more than exactly one month ago), and so is the value.

But once the global hash rate is no longer so steep, I expect the bubble to pop. The steepness is adding hot air to the balloon, letting it fly over really high mountains, but once it goes over, don't expect it to stay so high.

Why? You know that an increasing hash rate doesn't make more bitcoins, right?
25 are mined per day. That's it. Double the hash power of the network or halve it, and adjusts so that 25 are mined per day.
The power of the network is utterly meaningless.
 
Last edited:

philipma1957

Golden Member
Jan 8, 2012
1,714
0
76


maybe but one thing is for sure. If you are in the correct position you can sit back and rake in the cash.

My raking in is about 15 bucks a day. doing nothing at all.

the 15usd is after power and is after gear for gear as it is paid.

I earn them i sell them

No, that looks like debt. You understand that debt is the opposite of positive value, right?

That would be an interesting "bubble":

"Can I borrow $1000?"
"Sure."
"Can I borrow another $1000?"
"Sure."
"Can I borrow another $1000?"
"Sure."
"Do you want me to pay you back now?"
"No, your debt got too high. I just don't see it being worth $3000 anymore. I'm sorry, but the most I can take is $100."



So, pretty much the same as stocks and precious metals.



A tiny percentage and meaningless when the inflationary period ends, which is where stocks are and precious metals pretty much are: if you want them, you have to pay for them.
So again, the same.



Except a few large wallets hold the majority of bitcoins, like the majority of gold is held by central depositories. And stock ownership isn't controlled by a central authority.
So again, no advantage.




Oh, you mean like cashing out stocks or precious metals?
Sure, can't be a bubble, because it's "different!"



Why? You know that an increasing hash rate doesn't make more bitcoins, right?
25 are mined per day. That's it. Double the hash power of the network or halve it, and adjusts so that 25 are mined per day.
The power of the network is utterly meaningless.

this part is wrong ^^^ 25 coins a block not a day.

But this gravy train is going to die. The key reason is too much hash power in too few hands.
 

Chiropteran

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2003
9,811
110
106
No, that looks like debt. You understand that debt is the opposite of positive value, right?

You seem to be confused. The USD is entirely driven by debt. Every time the fed gives the big banks another 0% interest loan, it's effectively the same as printing money and putting it into circulation. Now, you are correct about one thing- the increase in debt has a direct reduction in value of the currency.

Well, the bitcoin "bubble" is a measure of the value of bitcoin in what currency exactly? USD. If debt is increasing at hyperbolic rates, value of USD will go down hyperbolic, and in relation the bitcoin value will seem to increase the same sort of rate. If it's impossible for the USD debt bubble to "collapse", then it is also impossible for the BTC bubble to collapse.

The interesting thing is that it's a lot more complicated of course, since people are buying bitcoin from all countries with all different kinds of currency, and the relative size of the markets are very different. The smaller bitcoin market shows changes much more drastically than the larger USD market.

So, pretty much the same as stocks and precious metals.

Not the same at all. New gold can be mined at variable rates, asteroid mining may destroy precious metal value for example. Stocks could fail due to problems with the company unrelated to the activity of stock traders. This CAN NOT happen to bitcoins. It can fail in other ways, but it's immune to the majority of manipulations that plague the stock market.

A tiny percentage and meaningless when the inflationary period ends, which is where stocks are and precious metals pretty much are: if you want them, you have to pay for them.
So again, the same.
Okay, the distribution is meaningless once the inflation ends? I don't really get what you are saying. The effects of distribution are not fully felt *until* inflation ends, which is when it is at it's maximum level of "meaningfulness". I mean, did you think the early adopters were excited to have 50,000 bitcoins when they were worth 1/1000 of a penny each, or do you think they are excited about it now that they are worth $70 each? Go ahead, tell them that their holdings are meaningless now, since the inflationary period is nearly over.


Except a few large wallets hold the majority of bitcoins, like the majority of gold is held by central depositories. And stock ownership isn't controlled by a central authority.
So again, no advantage.

It's a huge advantage. Who the hell cares who else has coins? That is irrelevant. On the other hand, "who controls a corporation" is incredibly relevant if you want to buy stock in it. The controller of a corp can destroy it, the controller of bitcoin can, do absolutely nothing beyond trade those coins, which is their intended purposes. The existance of a few users with 100,000 bitcoin each is of ZERO concern, it does not affect me at all. But if I were to invest in a corporation, the activity of the ceo and board of directors is a huge concern, critically important.

Oh, you mean like cashing out stocks or precious metals?
Sure, can't be a bubble, because it's "different!"

I never said it can't be a bubble, I just said that it doesn't follow the same rules as corporate or metal stock because it's unlike both.

Why? You know that an increasing hash rate doesn't make more bitcoins, right?
25 are mined per day. That's it. Double the hash power of the network or halve it, and adjusts so that 25 are mined per day.
The power of the network is utterly meaningless.

You really are ill-informed. The hash rate determines the security of the network. One of the few threats to bitcoin is the possibility of a 51% attack, which has a directly calculable cost based on the total hash of the network. Double the hash and the security of the currency is doubled. This is a sort of limit to the value of bitcoin, because if value inflated too fast and too far from the cost of a 51% attack such an attack might be cheaper to perform than the potential gains.
 

DominionSeraph

Diamond Member
Jul 22, 2009
8,386
32
91
You seem to be confused. The USD is entirely driven by debt. Every time the fed gives the big banks another 0% interest loan, it's effectively the same as printing money and putting it into circulation. Now, you are correct about one thing- the increase in debt has a direct reduction in value of the currency.

But it doesn't set it, which is where you're confused.

Well, the bitcoin "bubble" is a measure of the value of bitcoin in what currency exactly? USD. If debt is increasing at hyperbolic rates, value of USD will go down hyperbolic, and in relation the bitcoin value will seem to increase the same sort of rate. If it's impossible for the USD debt bubble to "collapse", then it is also impossible for the BTC bubble to collapse.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! He thinks the dollar is defined by how many bitcoins it will buy you!


Not the same at all. New gold can be mined at variable rates, asteroid mining may destroy precious metal value for example. Stocks could fail due to problems with the company unrelated to the activity of stock traders. This CAN NOT happen to bitcoins.

The destruction of the network would be more catastrophic than inflation, and EMP can arrange that.
And your understanding of stocks is hilariously broken. Of course they're not only tied to speculation. That's the point -- they represent ownership of a business. The failure of the business doesn't make the stock certificates go away, it makes them worthless. And do you know what bitcoins are? Stock certificates in a company that owns nothing and makes nothing. Yup, that's it -- they're nothing. You could use otherwise useless stock certificates as a fiat currency, but why would you do that when we have a government-backed system of just that already in the USD? It's like tulip bulbs -- sure you could use them, but why would you leave yourself open to that speculation?
And remember, the bitcoin network can hold you hostage for a fee for every single transaction, so it isn't even as good as dollars are at the job of currency.


Okay, the distribution is meaningless once the inflation ends? I don't really get what you are saying.

You said a "fair" means of distribution set bitcoins apart from precious metals. But Bitcoins are already hugely unrepresentatively distributed within the active bitcoin community itself, and those with the capital to run huge ASIC mining operations will monopolize the rest. So the only way an average person is going to get an appreciable amount of bitcoins is to buy them, just as with precious metals. If have a transaction that I wish to use gold as the currency, and I need $1000 to transfer, am I going to open a mine to get that gold? No, I can't afford that. If I want gold I need to buy it from someone who already has it.

It's a huge advantage. Who the hell cares who else has coins? That is irrelevant.

No, it isn't. If you define the value of a bitcoin through speculative trade by apparent scarcity, and they aren't trading thus generating artificial scarcity, you are increasing the perceived value of their holdings above the real trade value. You are effectively giving your wealth away.

If you and Bob trade a tulip bulb back and forth at ever-increasing values until it's inflated to the point you're willing to trade your house for it, then I come in out of the blue with a second tulip bulb and you trade your house for it, and then I won't take the tulip bulb back in trade for anything because it's just a stupid tulip bulb... what do you have? With now two tulip bulbs in circulation, even if Bob were still calculating from the previous purchase price, it's only worth half as much. With that sort of crash, Bob will likely hold onto what he has rather than risk trading for a crashing currency, so your tulip bulb crashes further because with no intrinsic value its value is only in what someone will trade for it, and me and Bob ain't trading. So you have given me real wealth -- a house -- simply because I came in with something you had construed as being worth something through your trades back and forth at an artificial scarcity level.

It rather matters that I had that tulip bulb.


I never said it can't be a bubble, I just said that it doesn't follow the same rules as corporate or metal stock because it's unlike both.

Yes, said understanding neither.

You really are ill-informed. The hash rate determines the security of the network. One of the few threats to bitcoin is the possibility of a 51% attack, which has a directly calculable cost based on the total hash of the network. Double the hash and the security of the currency is doubled.

Right, so ASICs in the hands of a few is "decreasing" the chance of that.

Who's ill-informed?
 
Last edited:
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |