So you have no actual argument to justify the unrealistic price quote, the considerably more power consumed, the lower performance.. A performance level even with the OC it can't even reach. Nothing to contest the need for 1337mv for a 15% OC? You want to compare it to the reference 780 Ti but also want to ignore the fact that the reference 780 Ti was capable of hitting 1175+ itself for a 18.5 to 22% increase in gaming performance...
Instead you just want to go with the personal attacks?
Did you NOT read the review?
QUOTE"
"the core easily hit nearly 1.2GHz while the memory evened out at 6016MHz. The best part about this is there’s even more room there since fan speeds were at 60% (which was still surprisingly quiet).
And yes, there's still more in the tank."
"By using it alongside the Performance Mode, frequencies could be pushed to the point where the R9 290X DirectCU II had no problem matching and in many situations beating NVIDIA’s mighty GTX 780 Ti."
Unrealistic pricing? Based on what, your inflated Newegg? Please bro, we've been over this before, even in your US of A, there are countless retailers and etailer which sells at MSRP (Amazon for one, thanks). What about the rest of the world, where 780s sell for nearly same price as R290X?
mV comparisons are invalid, what makes you think its equivalent between different architectures? A 15% OC with extra room for more as stated by the reviewers is fine.
And the personal callout is due your statement, we all know your history, you love everything NV, so you made that statement "Let's not pretend the only thing you're buying is hardware with these cards.", I just want to clarify, would this Asus R290X be a good deal IF the 780 was the same price at $570? Because you imply its not. Therefore, how can we argue with such bias?