Thanks for this, but it's not really so much that it's an "issue" per-se, it's just that I'm just taking issue with the whole "it just works" thing. As if these steps inherently better than the Android way, for instance. All "it just works" translates to in this context is: "Do it Apple's way." That's fine if you enjoy doing everything however Apple demands. I just find a lot of it roundabout and could so easily be simplified if it weren't based on silly pretenses.
For example, the 'we can't possibly have a file system!' thing is all just a pretense, I'm guessing based on the assumption by Apple that most of their users will get confused by something 'complex' like proper file management. To me, it's a glaring contraction with the notion that mobile devices will replace desktop computers, if their function level is going to remain stuck in a 'noob' mode forever.
I wish Apple would advance into the notion that even their newest customers won't remain 'noobs' forever. Generations are now growing up using iOS and mobile devices. Start working on what their needs will evolve into. I still believe the best devices have uses far beyond what their creators even imagine for them- but Apple arrogantly has no concept of this when it comes to the mobile space. (They do mostly have the concept of it with Macs at least). I wish they'd have the option to keep iOS in 'noob' mode, or for others to move on to a more advanced level with more options and choices.
I understand your thinking and I know my suggestion wasn't really addressing what your actual point was.
As for the future of computing, I tend to agree that Apple's vision is probably the closest. Not to drag the conversation too off topic, but computers and mobile device will be treated more like appliances for the vast majority of users i the future. People won't want to navigate file systems. They'll want to add their cloud account, where all their files are stored, and use their applications that look for files stored on cloud storage. The end goal, I believe, is to have your table, phone and desktop all have the same base user interface with access to the same files and apps across all devices and the ability to move seamlessly between them.
Of course, OF COURSE, some people will still need what we would still consider 'real computers'. But I would gamble that this segment is not significantly large. The vast consumer market of people wanting what are essentially going to be dumb terminals is going to be where the money is at. Not in hardware, but in services and ecosystem. I believe that's the future and I believe that's the future Apple and Microsoft are aiming at right now. I believe that even in 2007 Apple was thinking more about what 2020 was going to look like than what 2013 was going to look like and I don't believe Google is that forward looking right now. I believe Apple is concentrating more on the future at the expense of the present.
Now I totally get where you, and a lot of others are coming from. I think that you should probably comes to grips with the fact that Apple is simply not targeting you as a consumer. They, quite simply, will never implement the features you're looking for in a consumer device. I would put money on an "iPhone Pro" that costs $200 more than a standard iPhone and a separate, but compatible, iOS Pro version that gave some extra features like plug and play usb access to the file system or the ability to set any app as a system wide default before those features wound up in the mainstream iOS version.
That doesn't make the approach iOS is taking wrong, it just makes it wrong for people like you. Just like I don't feel Android is right for me. But I don't sit around wondering asking myself "Why are Android users so dumb? Why can't they just SEE what I see?". I just sit back and enjoy using what I like to use and try to always try everything to make sure there's nothing I don't like better out there.
That was way longer than I intended.
tl;dr - "Yeah, well, that's just like, your opinion, man!"