Originally posted by: Dubb
Originally posted by: MainFramed
People said go fvck yourself detroit when walking from work to their car they were getting raped, or they walk out a door and watch their car get hiested right there in front of them. I've worked down here (detroit) now for 3 years, been in and out of the city since i was born. three weeks ago i watched a guy get thrown out an apartment window accross the street, he came running into my building asking for us to call the cops, thing is they wont show for 3 days. i can call em, have many times, they dont show.
walking around town with a backpack on you, you fit in with the rest, most downtown inhabiters have backpacks, thats there most likely only property, their pride and joy, carrying their most sacred possecions. you felt safe? stupid. backpack or not.
btw, illitch has done great things for detroit, detroit is going south from folks like kilpatrick, and its past colmon young, those are people worth shooting.
Originally posted by: jndietz
i don't care what any one says. detroit is unsafe.
/thread
sigh...Read my previous responses to ignorant comments like this. these attitudes are as much the problem as anything else, if not far more so.
I blended in? I guess it was all the bums that walk around with aluminum tripods and metal breifcases that say "Neumann" on the side. I know I've seen lots of those in detoit.
Here's the secret on the crime statistics: they're misleading. By alot. Here's why:
the statistics are usually taken (and logically so) for new york are not the new york metro area, but the area officially labled ast new york city. same thing goes for detroit: not the metro area but the area officially under the control of the city government. makes sense right?
so how are those two areas different? a little history:
in 1897 new york city was disolved. it was then combined with brooklyn (the nations 7th largest city at the time) and 3 other semi-rural communities in an annexation orgy to create the 5 boroughs now known as the big apple. the end result, in addition to a larger and growing tax base, was that both wealthy and poor (read: more crime) communities were under the same name. many other cities went through similar transformations around the same time- cities annexing outer communities as they grew was very common, and the effects of this are obvious: there are virtually crime-free parts of chicago, and parts with a bad reputation, same as most large cities. But when the statistics are taken, the crime numbers tend to even each other out.
detroit was never allowed such growing capabilities by the michigan state legislature. it is the only city of that size and growth rate at the time that was not. hence the divide at 8 mile, and hence somewhat autononomus communities like hamtrammack being wholly enclosed by the city of detroit. if you allow what you call the city of detroit to jump county lines like its growth progression would have dicated, detroit would have included parts of oakland and maccomb counties (which, coincidentally, are consistantly rated as some of the lowest crime rates in the country), the result is that the numbers, like other cities, pretty much even out.
it's not an issue of crime. it's an issue of in what area you measure it.
Also, and I won't get into everything here, but there are many other issues that arose out of this limitation. you can probably infer most of it.
uh, Ilitch did great things? hmmm, there's that ignorance again. let's tally a few results:
good:
-Fox theater restoration. very well done and properly funded. <applause>
-there's also comerica park, but that's debatable. I'll count it as good for sake of ease
Bad:
-he wrestled control of the UA theater and let it rot, leaving it open to vandals
-he bought the Madison lenox, let it rot even further, leaving it open to vandals and then somehow bypassed the historic comission restricitons and got the city to foot the demolition bill.
-he bought the fine arts building and let it rot.
that's just a small taste. for sake of space I'll end it there, but there are many, many more. then there's the underhanded casino deals (through his wife, since he can't legally have anything to do with gambling as a sports owner), and it becomes pretty obvious he's as tied in with the city corruption as anybody, and by far the single person most responsible for the urban decay and loss of architectural treasures in the city of detroit.
http://www.metrotimes.com/editorial/story.asp?id=8110
Yes, the city government has problems. kwame is an idiot, I agree.
However, Detroit's city government will improve when people start demanding that it does. That won't happen when so many who have a vested interest in the city write the whole thing off with a mix of hate and apathy. hate and apathy just breed more hate and apathy. it's the story of detroits last 35-50 years, congratulations everyone on making it worse. Bravo!
My original point, however, was that detroit has lots of things to be excited about, they're just not in plain sight. Residents have done things to influence their community without the help of state funding or the city government, and they should be proud of that at a time when everyone else just lobs sh!t at them.
it's also the only city today that has the potential to re-think urban life: what are the consequences of a city that doesn't demand density? There's a whole new typology just waiting to develop there...
I love detroit and am fascinated by it, and I'm saying you all need to look a little deeper than the shiny new stadia and run down buildings.