It's hurting the republicans. If you overreact on every little thing, then when there comes an actual real scandal - people will be so desensitized they will get ignored.
Watching the GOP's interrogation of Comey live. This is good for Clinton, mainly because Comey comes across as highly credible.
It's amazing. Now the GOP want to interrogate Comey. It's an investigation of an investigation of an investigation at this point.
These morons just don't know when to quit and it always bites them in the ass. They are probably too scared of the wrath of the crazies to be able to act strategically.
I new it would be, max damage potential was reached with Comey's press conference, everything Comey has to put a finer point on in light of no charges being filed just works that back.
The attack vector is now apparent. Republicans are trying to demonstrate that Clinton lied under oath during the Benghazi hearings. Comey clearly articulated his rationale for not recommending indictment, but Gowdy is articulating a reasonable argument of circumstantial evidence as indicative of intent.
The attack vector is now apparent. Republicans are trying to demonstrate that Clinton lied under oath during the Benghazi hearings. Comey clearly articulated his rationale for not recommending indictment, but Gowdy is articulating a reasonable argument of circumstantial evidence as indicative of intent.
“In that case, you had vast quantities of highly classified information … not only shared with someone without authority to have it, but we found it in a search warrant, hidden under the insulation in his attic, and then he lied to us about it during the investigation,” Comey said. “So you have obstruction of justice. You have intentional misconduct. And a vast quantity of classified information. He admitted it was the wrong thing to do.
The attack vector is now apparent. Republicans are trying to demonstrate that Clinton lied under oath during the Benghazi hearings. Comey clearly articulated his rationale for not recommending indictment, but Gowdy is articulating a reasonable argument of circumstantial evidence as indicative of intent.
I interpreted Gowdy's comments as asserting that a former First Lady, Senator and SoS should be held to a higher standard given an expectation of her having an elevated awareness around implications in her decision making.Professional people, unlike politicians, get where they are to some real degree because of mental clarity and high functioning reasoning ability. The notion that an argument proffered by Gowdy would appear reasonable to the majority of such minds is just a fabrication of your addled conservative mental state. It's simply delusional.
vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice.
LOL, the e-mails marked classified on HRC's server totaled three, they were improperly marked, and weren't actually classified in the first place. TY Rep Cummings and everyone who insisted Comey testify today.
I interpreted Gowdy's comments as asserting that a former First Lady, Senator and SoS should be held to a higher standard given an expectation of her having an elevated awareness around implications in her decision making.
I find the line of questions challenging Comey's integrity absolutely out of line.
They can launch whatever they want, the question is who will take them seriously, since they've cried Wolf so many times. And of course there is the small problem of their nominee being Trump.
The same ones who always take them seriously, the media.
Sounds like the Clinton Foundation is the next target.