thebestMAX
Diamond Member
- Sep 14, 2000
- 7,503
- 134
- 106
Just curious. Why are semi automatic handguns called automatic?Originally posted by: thebestMAX
A Few of Mine
LOLOriginally posted by: thebestMAX
oldsmoboat-
Misnomer. Just laziness on the part of most people.
The Beretta handbook even calls them semiautomatic firearms.
They are, however, pistols also.
Going to change my website page now.
Originally posted by: Brutuskend
I've got a crappy 9mm I bought for $100.00, it shoots straight but after I fired one box of rounds through it it stopped ejecting the spend casings.
Any gun smiths here???
In addition to ignorance or indifference, there really is no 'absolutely proper' name unless it becomes important in the discussion to distinguish between an automatic and semi-automatic. And even if there were an 'absolutely proper' name, how often do people adhere to the proper title or name of anything?Just curious. Why are semi automatic handguns called automatic?
IE:
Smith and Wesson 45 ACP
BERETTA .25 CALIBER AUTOMATIC
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Would I just be able to use this, or would I be better off buying a different kind of rifle for long-range target shooting? (i.e. wanna be sniper in the making). I apologize for not knowing more about his .30-06, I've shot it once in my lifetime. Most of the other weapons I have significantly more experience with.
In the same vein, if I did want to purchase a more powerful sidearm to carry (eventually), is there any particular characteristic I should be looking for? Or should I go ask a gun dealer what they recommend and if they would let me try a few different calibers and models?
Originally posted by: niwi7
lol u just answered how to keep them
like i said what the hell can u do if a guy busts into your house aims a gun @ u and says gimme ur stuff
hold on a sec lemme just open this gun case so we can have a shootout in the bedroom rite here hold on...oh here it is ok lets go....
Originally posted by: machintos
I don't believe in guns and I'm not a violent person.
I believe everything can be solved without the use of guns.
I don't see the point of having a gun in my house unless I am planning to kill somebody.
Originally posted by: Muse
Originally posted by: machintos
I don't believe in guns and I'm not a violent person.
I believe everything can be solved without the use of guns.
I don't see the point of having a gun in my house unless I am planning to kill somebody.
Yeah, I can relate to this. A couple years ago I got into it with people in the alt.home.repairs or rec.woodworking newsgroup (can't remember which, but both groups are full of rednecks). There was a guy who proudly displayed his NRA membership credentials in his signature. He was among a whole load of guys who came after me -- on the list, of course! I was saying that all guns should be banned, basically. My argument was that there wouldn't be all these shootings, or at least anywhere's near as many, if guns weren't so damn accessible. I spoke my mind, but I wouldn't get into it in a group like that again. There's just a plethora of people there that are seriously attached to owning firearms. I'm a college radio DJ and like my brother says, I "have a song for everything." My song for this is "Gun" by John Cale.
Problem: How do I hit my target from 100 yds?I believe everything can be solved without the use of guns.
No, it's intuitive. The thing is, anybody who has the idea to get a gun nowadays in the US can get one, unless they are (not eligible and law abiding). John Cale's premise in the song is that once you have a gun, you start to "think like a gun." Owning firearms changes your psychology over time. In England, if I'm not mistaken, you can't just buy a gun. Even the cops don't go around with guns. I see again and again almost every day where cops in the USA shoot people, almost always killing them, very very often when they could have dealt with the situation in a more peaceable manner. I don't think all these cops should be tooling around with these guns on their hips, either. It's real dangerous out there and guns are the biggest reason why. Yes, you can say, if possessing a gun is illegal only outlaws will have guns. But over time, there would be less and less of them until they were relatively rare. It would take a long time, but 50 years down the line, you would find that gunfire would be uncommon compared to today. You wouldn't have to jump every time you hear a loud pop like you do nowadays. Where I live, people are being popped all the time. Not far from where I live, people are just used to the sound of gunfire. It's been that way for many years and it's just been getting worse and worse. It's a very unhealthy situation and the only way I can think of curing it is gun control, and I favor a very stringent form of it.Originally posted by: FallenHero
Originally posted by: Muse
Originally posted by: machintos
I don't believe in guns and I'm not a violent person.
I believe everything can be solved without the use of guns.
I don't see the point of having a gun in my house unless I am planning to kill somebody.
Yeah, I can relate to this. A couple years ago I got into it with people in the alt.home.repairs or rec.woodworking newsgroup (can't remember which, but both groups are full of rednecks). There was a guy who proudly displayed his NRA membership credentials in his signature. He was among a whole load of guys who came after me -- on the list, of course! I was saying that all guns should be banned, basically. My argument was that there wouldn't be all these shootings, or at least anywhere's near as many, if guns weren't so damn accessible. I spoke my mind, but I wouldn't get into it in a group like that again. There's just a plethora of people there that are seriously attached to owning firearms. I'm a college radio DJ and like my brother says, I "have a song for everything." My song for this is "Gun" by John Cale.
You got any stats to back up that argument?
Gun runners and gang bangers dont care about gun laws. All gun control does is take the guns out of the hands of law abiting citizens.