- Mar 20, 2000
- 102,389
- 8,547
- 126
I'm thinking Biden should keep his mouth shut for the most part until 11/3. He has a sizeable polling lead right now, better than Clinton ever had. We don't need any unforced errors. Just let Trump do the talking. He's a walking unforced error.
He doesn't speak unless he has something to say. He's been quite eloquent recently-
Ha ha ha ha . This asshole is a mental midget.
So, I guess an important question here, in light of what happened in 2016, are CNN and others using a politically skewed sample or not.
Of course, other than that point, Trump got exactly what he paid for.
I have retained highly respected pollster, McLaughlin & Associates, to analyze todays CNN Poll (and others), which I felt were FAKE based on the incredible enthusiasm we are receiving. Read analysis for yourself. This is the same thing they and others did when we defeated...
It’s hilarious because internal Trump pollsters and GOP pollsters have highly negative polling data and have been throwing up red flags for over a month now.
Internal GOP polling shows Trump in the margin of error in Georgia and Texas.
If their own polling of red states shows extremely close races they have more problems than “skewed” media polls. Honestly it’s just another distraction and more of his “fake news” bullshit.
There is a reason why there is a sense of panic amongst campaigns for incumbent GOP congressmen in not just swing districts. It has nothing to do with media polls but their own internal polling data...
Skewed? But shouldn’t it be randomized when they make a call? Not like they know it’s a Republican or Democrat going to answer. Sure the final breakdown has to be taken into account, but it’s not like they on purposely only polled never Trumpers.
Quinnipiac has a recent poll with trump and biden neck and neck in Texas.When GOP reps/senators start bailing on Trump, I'll believe that they are scared of losing seats (which, BTW, is what I hope happens).
Yeah, but 'randomized' sampling can still produced biased cohorts. If the party affiliation was heavily biased, the polling should have been extended, rather than being published.
What I find hilarious is that McLaughlin is the same firm that predicted two weeks before the election that Eric Cantor had a 34 point lead. We all remember how that went right?It’s hilarious because internal Trump pollsters and GOP pollsters have highly negative polling data and have been throwing up red flags for over a month now.
Internal GOP polling shows Trump in the margin of error in Georgia and Texas.
If their own polling of red states shows extremely close races they have more problems than “skewed” media polls. Honestly it’s just another distraction and more of his “fake news” bullshit.
There is a reason why there is a sense of panic amongst campaigns for incumbent GOP congressmen in not just swing districts. It has nothing to do with media polls but their own internal polling data...