Would a Dyson work for an all tile house? What I mean work is would it clean just as good as if it were a carpeted house? Was Dyson vacuums made to clean/suck off of a tile floor? Thanks!
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
That would be a colossal waste of money. A mop is what you need.
Originally posted by: mzkhadir
I was reading Consumer reports and they said that the Dyson doesn't do a good job overall.
Originally posted by: mzkhadir
I was reading Consumer reports and they said that the Dyson doesn't do a good job overall.
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: mzkhadir
I was reading Consumer reports and they said that the Dyson doesn't do a good job overall.
As an owner I can catagorically state that is a flying lie.
The suction is so high it has warnings to prevent injury and for good reason.
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: mzkhadir
I was reading Consumer reports and they said that the Dyson doesn't do a good job overall.
As an owner I can catagorically state that is a flying lie.
The suction is so high it has warnings to prevent injury and for good reason.
sorry you are just justifying your purchase. consumer reports doesn't just pull reviews out of their asses, they test products in a rational/scientific manner. the dysons were rated as only average suction to begin with. of course dyson puts a warning on it, its marketing and obviously works considering their fat profits.
Originally posted by: dartworth
Originally posted by: ElFenix
just get a roomba
/thread
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: mzkhadir
I was reading Consumer reports and they said that the Dyson doesn't do a good job overall.
As an owner I can catagorically state that is a flying lie.
The suction is so high it has warnings to prevent injury and for good reason.
sorry you are just justifying your purchase. consumer reports doesn't just pull reviews out of their asses, they test products in a rational/scientific manner. the dysons were rated as only average suction to begin with. of course dyson puts a warning on it, its marketing and obviously works considering their fat profits.
Not at all. If it was crap, I'd tell you. I had a USR9106 Wireless router that was crap. See, I can face it when stuff is arse.
It works extremely well. Have you used one?
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: mzkhadir
I was reading Consumer reports and they said that the Dyson doesn't do a good job overall.
As an owner I can catagorically state that is a flying lie.
The suction is so high it has warnings to prevent injury and for good reason.
sorry you are just justifying your spending 2-3x times more for a "pretty" vaccum cleaner. consumer reports doesn't just pull reviews out of their asses, they test products in a rational/scientific manner. the dysons were rated as only average suction to begin with. of course dyson puts a warning on it, its marketing and obviously works considering their fat profits.
With its striking design and ? unusually for Hoover ? a premium price tag, this bagless upright looks like an attempt to woo Dyson devotees. Hoover reckons The One is the result of two years? development work, so we wondered whether it could really herald a resurgence.
Unfortunately, it?s a disaster. It might look fancy, but its cleaning results are among the worst we?ve ever seen. It manages to collect just 5 per cent of dust from floorboards. And using this machine to ?clean? your carpet is, truth be told, a waste of time ? it picks up only about 34 per cent of dust (compare that with the Dyson DC07, which sucks up 86 per cent of dust). It barely touches pet hair, either.
Results this ropey are rare, so we tried a couple more 'Ones' to check we hadn?t bought a dud. But they were just as bad. And we showed our results to Hoover. It says it?s carried out its own tests and has the ?utmost confidence? in The One. We don?t.
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: mzkhadir
I was reading Consumer reports and they said that the Dyson doesn't do a good job overall.
As an owner I can catagorically state that is a flying lie.
The suction is so high it has warnings to prevent injury and for good reason.
sorry you are just justifying your purchase. consumer reports doesn't just pull reviews out of their asses, they test products in a rational/scientific manner. the dysons were rated as only average suction to begin with. of course dyson puts a warning on it, its marketing and obviously works considering their fat profits.
Not at all. If it was crap, I'd tell you. I had a USR9106 Wireless router that was crap. See, I can face it when stuff is arse.
It works extremely well. Have you used one?
no, no one i know wastes that much on vacumns, but i do know that dysons done poorly twice in consumer reports already, and the new one with the ball isn't even easy to control, and none have top level suction, so the claims do seem to be all marketing lies by dyson. that and i know in marketing studies they show that appearances do effect perception. and consumer reports isn't out to get dyson. i trust their tests on home appliances as they've been testing them for decades now.