Originally posted by: CRXican
AMDZen goes wacky and get's all excited and makes typos but again he's correct.
No, we point them out because we are elitist pricks.Originally posted by: AMDZen
Originally posted by: CRXican
AMDZen goes wacky and get's all excited and makes typos but again he's correct.
Wacky eh? Sure I make typo's, I type fast and I don't really care. But maybe you didn't realize what a complete run-on sentence this is. But really, gramatical and/or punctuation errrors are completely irrelevant to any topic discussion. People that use these in their defense do so because they have nothing better to argue their point with.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
No your[sic] the 'Dietary Health Dick' today. Although 'Elitist Pr!ck' would be an oppropriate title for you some days as well. Along with lots of other forum members around here who all think their opinion is the only one that matters.
Originally posted by: crt1530
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Originally posted by: Vic
Of course, we all know you know nothing about cars and that you can't prove that statement without using the original C&D comparison done by Rod Millen, who is a contractor for Mitsu.Originally posted by: AMDZen
Evo is way better. Faster than, brakes faster, and Handles a lot better then the STi.
In a recent article by C&D, called Why Do These Similar Cars Feel So Different?, the mag admitted that it may have been wrong.
Actually, the tuning is as easy as adding a small amount of negative camber to the front wheel alignment.The Mitsu's neutral handling, however, was only able to overcome the Subaru's gutsy motor at one track. And we think some subtle chassis tuning on the STi would likely make it quicker everywhere. The tuning may be something as easy as an air-pressure adjustment.
So... way better? You're way wrong. The STi equals or beats the Evo in about every performance category. Numbers don't lie. And considering the Evo is Mitsu-built crap, while the Subaru is nicer in just about every respect...
Another person that thinks that I care about there opinion. You can believe whatever you want to believe. I can see just by this biased post that your a moron, I could care less what you think about me.
I could go and find the Road and Track and Motor Trend articles that found the same numbers as Car and Driver did. As well as numerous other tests. But Why would I waste my time? Anyone who knows about cars has already read these comparisson's.
And the fact remains, the Evo has LESS power - but its faster in the 1/4 and 0-60. It handles A LOT better then the STi. Somethnig like 1.03 g's in a stock Evo, and .89 in the STi. That is a huge difference, and places the Evo as one of the best handling cars in the world. So now your going to argue about what Car and Driver did to the STi, by altering the camber they made it handle better - well if your going to play around with the numbers on one car, you have to do it to both. So what happens when you tune both cars for max handling? That quote you made is the most biased quote I've ever heard. And if you overclock a Pentium 4, but DON'T overclock the AMD64, I'm sure the P4 can actually win some gaming benchmarks. Please.
As it stands now - your argument is so biased, everyone will see who knows what about cars. The numbers are all around, and the Evo wins.
Reliability is another argument altogether. The question was, which would you buy - and I answered it with my opinion. If I wanted a car like this, it would be because I have the money and I could care less how long it lasts - I would beat the sh!t out of it any way. And I'd be whopping every Subaru I saw on the street too. No matter what you think, your opinion is not better then mine - you elitist pr!ck.
Damn you, you elitist pricks!Originally posted by: Skoorb
No, we point them out because we are elitist pricks.Originally posted by: AMDZen
Originally posted by: CRXican
AMDZen goes wacky and get's all excited and makes typos but again he's correct.
Wacky eh? Sure I make typo's, I type fast and I don't really care. But maybe you didn't realize what a complete run-on sentence this is. But really, gramatical and/or punctuation errrors are completely irrelevant to any topic discussion. People that use these in their defense do so because they have nothing better to argue their point with.
Originally posted by: Skoorb
No, we point them out because we are elitist pricks.Originally posted by: AMDZen
Originally posted by: CRXican
AMDZen goes wacky and get's all excited and makes typos but again he's correct.
Wacky eh? Sure I make typo's, I type fast and I don't really care. But maybe you didn't realize what a complete run-on sentence this is. But really, gramatical and/or punctuation errrors are completely irrelevant to any topic discussion. People that use these in their defense do so because they have nothing better to argue their point with.
This from the guy who took my on-topic response to a question about Pepsi One and totally ran away with it calling me a dietary health dick. "Those in glass houses", AmdZen!My point exactly. You can't argue the things I've said, so you have to point out simple gramatical errors. I type your for all types of the word, same with there, their and they're. I just don't care. And I find it remarkable that you think this sort of argument is even remotely relevant to the topic.
Oh, it doesn't piss me off. If anything it motivates me to continue on the course of truth. Do you think the grapes on the tree were pissed off when the fox called them sour? I'm the grape!No YOU are a 'Dietary Health Dick'. Or should I say your a 'Dietary Health Dick' just to piss you off.
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Originally posted by: Skoorb
No your[sic] the 'Dietary Health Dick' today. Although 'Elitist Pr!ck' would be an oppropriate title for you some days as well. Along with lots of other forum members around here who all think their opinion is the only one that matters.
Originally posted by: crt1530
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Originally posted by: Vic
Of course, we all know you know nothing about cars and that you can't prove that statement without using the original C&D comparison done by Rod Millen, who is a contractor for Mitsu.Originally posted by: AMDZen
Evo is way better. Faster than, brakes faster, and Handles a lot better then the STi.
In a recent article by C&D, called Why Do These Similar Cars Feel So Different?, the mag admitted that it may have been wrong.
Actually, the tuning is as easy as adding a small amount of negative camber to the front wheel alignment.The Mitsu's neutral handling, however, was only able to overcome the Subaru's gutsy motor at one track. And we think some subtle chassis tuning on the STi would likely make it quicker everywhere. The tuning may be something as easy as an air-pressure adjustment.
So... way better? You're way wrong. The STi equals or beats the Evo in about every performance category. Numbers don't lie. And considering the Evo is Mitsu-built crap, while the Subaru is nicer in just about every respect...
Another person that thinks that I care about there opinion. You can believe whatever you want to believe. I can see just by this biased post that your a moron, I could care less what you think about me.
I could go and find the Road and Track and Motor Trend articles that found the same numbers as Car and Driver did. As well as numerous other tests. But Why would I waste my time? Anyone who knows about cars has already read these comparisson's.
And the fact remains, the Evo has LESS power - but its faster in the 1/4 and 0-60. It handles A LOT better then the STi. Somethnig like 1.03 g's in a stock Evo, and .89 in the STi. That is a huge difference, and places the Evo as one of the best handling cars in the world. So now your going to argue about what Car and Driver did to the STi, by altering the camber they made it handle better - well if your going to play around with the numbers on one car, you have to do it to both. So what happens when you tune both cars for max handling? That quote you made is the most biased quote I've ever heard. And if you overclock a Pentium 4, but DON'T overclock the AMD64, I'm sure the P4 can actually win some gaming benchmarks. Please.
As it stands now - your argument is so biased, everyone will see who knows what about cars. The numbers are all around, and the Evo wins.
Reliability is another argument altogether. The question was, which would you buy - and I answered it with my opinion. If I wanted a car like this, it would be because I have the money and I could care less how long it lasts - I would beat the sh!t out of it any way. And I'd be whopping every Subaru I saw on the street too. No matter what you think, your opinion is not better then mine - you elitist pr!ck.
My point exactly. You can't argue the things I've said, so you have to point out simple gramatical errors. I type your for all types of the word, same with there, their and they're. I just don't care. And I find it remarkable that you think this sort of argument is even remotely relevant to the topic.
Originally posted by: crt1530
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Originally posted by: Skoorb
No your[sic] the 'Dietary Health Dick' today. Although 'Elitist Pr!ck' would be an oppropriate title for you some days as well. Along with lots of other forum members around here who all think their opinion is the only one that matters.
Originally posted by: crt1530
Originally posted by: AMDZen
Originally posted by: Vic
Of course, we all know you know nothing about cars and that you can't prove that statement without using the original C&D comparison done by Rod Millen, who is a contractor for Mitsu.Originally posted by: AMDZen
Evo is way better. Faster than, brakes faster, and Handles a lot better then the STi.
In a recent article by C&D, called Why Do These Similar Cars Feel So Different?, the mag admitted that it may have been wrong.
Actually, the tuning is as easy as adding a small amount of negative camber to the front wheel alignment.The Mitsu's neutral handling, however, was only able to overcome the Subaru's gutsy motor at one track. And we think some subtle chassis tuning on the STi would likely make it quicker everywhere. The tuning may be something as easy as an air-pressure adjustment.
So... way better? You're way wrong. The STi equals or beats the Evo in about every performance category. Numbers don't lie. And considering the Evo is Mitsu-built crap, while the Subaru is nicer in just about every respect...
Another person that thinks that I care about there opinion. You can believe whatever you want to believe. I can see just by this biased post that your a moron, I could care less what you think about me.
I could go and find the Road and Track and Motor Trend articles that found the same numbers as Car and Driver did. As well as numerous other tests. But Why would I waste my time? Anyone who knows about cars has already read these comparisson's.
And the fact remains, the Evo has LESS power - but its faster in the 1/4 and 0-60. It handles A LOT better then the STi. Somethnig like 1.03 g's in a stock Evo, and .89 in the STi. That is a huge difference, and places the Evo as one of the best handling cars in the world. So now your going to argue about what Car and Driver did to the STi, by altering the camber they made it handle better - well if your going to play around with the numbers on one car, you have to do it to both. So what happens when you tune both cars for max handling? That quote you made is the most biased quote I've ever heard. And if you overclock a Pentium 4, but DON'T overclock the AMD64, I'm sure the P4 can actually win some gaming benchmarks. Please.
As it stands now - your argument is so biased, everyone will see who knows what about cars. The numbers are all around, and the Evo wins.
Reliability is another argument altogether. The question was, which would you buy - and I answered it with my opinion. If I wanted a car like this, it would be because I have the money and I could care less how long it lasts - I would beat the sh!t out of it any way. And I'd be whopping every Subaru I saw on the street too. No matter what you think, your opinion is not better then mine - you elitist pr!ck.
My point exactly. You can't argue the things I've said, so you have to point out simple gramatical errors. I type your for all types of the word, same with there, their and they're. I just don't care. And I find it remarkable that you think this sort of argument is even remotely relevant to the topic.
I wasn't trying to be on topic. Reading your terribly composed engrish hurt my head and I wanted everyone to notice what a moron you are.
Somebody had to say itOriginally posted by: AMDZen
I'm a moron because I type to[sic] fast to notice or care if I'm using the right "your" in the right context? OK, I can live with that.
As long as you don't say I don't know cars, especially when I state only facts.
My only beef in this thread was with Vic.
Shoot for the stars!!!!!Originally posted by: AMDZen
Oh and BTW I did realize that I used the wrong "to" up there. Should have been "too" for all those with sticks in their a$$e$. I plan on doing this on purpose from now on. I can only imagine how anal you would have to be, I bet your blood boils when you see it.
"AhahhAHHAh, its Too not to" "Its you're, not your - ahhhhhh, its there not their."
Hopefully I can make someone's head explode
Originally posted by: BlackOmen
"The EVO is ghetto. What a piece of crap. . . . I don't care what the performance numbers say, that thing is a rolling dogturd wrapped in a foil gum wrapper. Mitsubishi, who are not known for their build quality or longevity, takes a crap econo-car that in these parts is usually seen sporting mad-tite-rimz-y0 in the ghetto sections of most cities and adds a powertrain designed to pretty much run the car into a smoldering heap, then sells it for big money to the Fast and Furious/Rally Racer wannabes. I'm sorry, but even as funky looking as it is, I'd gladly take the WRX over that turd-hammer Mistubishi."
Not an original work by me, but i did edit it for language. Pretty much sums up how I feel about it though.
Originally posted by: CRXican
Originally posted by: BlackOmen
"The EVO is ghetto. What a piece of crap. . . . I don't care what the performance numbers say, that thing is a rolling dogturd wrapped in a foil gum wrapper. Mitsubishi, who are not known for their build quality or longevity, takes a crap econo-car that in these parts is usually seen sporting mad-tite-rimz-y0 in the ghetto sections of most cities and adds a powertrain designed to pretty much run the car into a smoldering heap, then sells it for big money to the Fast and Furious/Rally Racer wannabes. I'm sorry, but even as funky looking as it is, I'd gladly take the WRX over that turd-hammer Mistubishi."
Not an original work by me, but i did edit it for language. Pretty much sums up how I feel about it though.
makes you just as lame as whoever wrote the original
have you been in or around an EVO in person?
Originally posted by: CRXican
how bout come picks of a wicked evo from the shop I get my work done at?
Huge Intercooler
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v43/eckoplaya/EVO%20VIII/IMG_1258.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v43/eckoplaya/EVO%20VIII/IMG_1265.jpg
Crazy Carbon Fiber parts
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v43/eckoplaya/EVO%20VIII/IMG_1260.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v43/eckoplaya/EVO%20VIII/IMG_1272.jpg
18" Work wheels with Rotora big brake kit $4,000 price tag, maybe more, something crazy
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v43/eckoplaya/EVO%20VIII/IMG_1274.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v43/eckoplaya/EVO%20VIII/IMG_1275.jpg
Yeah their EVOs do well, though I don't know that they get the precisely same models. In any case at the end of one review they said that although the EVO did better with the numbers they'd rather have the STI, even though they couldn't quite say why.Originally posted by: otispunkmeyer
im sure on topgear the evo absolutely trounced the scooby in a straight line......either top gear or one of them shows clarkson did