Originally posted by: Skoorb
If she's 5,8 I would not be willing to go out with her beyond 150, no matter what. If she's "shapely", then I'd initiate interest at 140.
That's general, because I have seen some attractive girls with the 5,8/150 sort of dimension, but the problem is that you VERY RARELY see a face-hot chick who's got some lbs to lose. Generally their entire body is in line with itself.
I don't really prefer girls taller than 5'8" ... and I don't like bone-thin at all. As for the opposite end of the spectrum, as long as she's got a bikini-body (meaning - not afraid to show herself), then it's just fine. Health is important to me too.Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
OK, how bout I word it differently...would you prefer tall and skinny? short and tiny? a little bit to grab onto? ribs showing? an ass you can see from the front?...
Originally posted by: Deeko
Is this ILoveLamp character a fat girl trying to justify herself or something?
Originally posted by: Deeko
Is this ILoveLamp character a fat girl trying to justify herself or something?
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
What height/weight combo would be the maximum that you would date, and what's the heaviest girl you've ever gone for?
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
Originally posted by: Skoorb
If she's 5,8 I would not be willing to go out with her beyond 150, no matter what. If she's "shapely", then I'd initiate interest at 140.
That's general, because I have seen some attractive girls with the 5,8/150 sort of dimension, but the problem is that you VERY RARELY see a face-hot chick who's got some lbs to lose. Generally their entire body is in line with itself.
Well would you rather go out with a bigger girl with a gorgeous face or a fit-and-trim girl that looks like she got attacked by some sort of large animal?
Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
What height/weight combo would be the maximum that you would date, and what's the heaviest girl you've ever gone for?
depends on the girls build... if all the weight is in her chest 120-130 is ok on a big busted gal.. as long as she dont have a gut or a nasty butt
there are cute small girls that got a lil weight on them to support a huge natural rack =P ie my wife was 5'6 120 but she was supportting natural 36 DDs on her frame...but still had a flat tummy and no handles..
I really could put up with neither.Well would you rather go out with a bigger girl with a gorgeous face or a fit-and-trim girl that looks like she got attacked by some sort of large animal?
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
Originally posted by: Skoorb
If she's 5,8 I would not be willing to go out with her beyond 150, no matter what. If she's "shapely", then I'd initiate interest at 140.
That's general, because I have seen some attractive girls with the 5,8/150 sort of dimension, but the problem is that you VERY RARELY see a face-hot chick who's got some lbs to lose. Generally their entire body is in line with itself.
Well would you rather go out with a bigger girl with a gorgeous face or a fit-and-trim girl that looks like she got attacked by some sort of large animal?
Originally posted by: Doboji
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
Originally posted by: Skoorb
If she's 5,8 I would not be willing to go out with her beyond 150, no matter what. If she's "shapely", then I'd initiate interest at 140.
That's general, because I have seen some attractive girls with the 5,8/150 sort of dimension, but the problem is that you VERY RARELY see a face-hot chick who's got some lbs to lose. Generally their entire body is in line with itself.
Well would you rather go out with a bigger girl with a gorgeous face or a fit-and-trim girl that looks like she got attacked by some sort of large animal?
define "bigger"
if bigger means this then I would prefer a beautiful face to a ugly girl with a skinny body.
However if bigger means L=this]http://pics.bbzzdd.com/users/IBJEDI7/newstarsfat.jpg[/L] then aahhhhhh uggggghhhh noooooo ahhhhhh ehhhhh eeeeee
-Max
yah really bad for her back...Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
Damn, 5'6 120 and huge boobs, that's just unhealthy.Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
What height/weight combo would be the maximum that you would date, and what's the heaviest girl you've ever gone for?
depends on the girls build... if all the weight is in her chest 120-130 is ok on a big busted gal.. as long as she dont have a gut or a nasty butt
there are cute small girls that got a lil weight on them to support a huge natural rack =P ie my wife was 5'6 120 but she was supportting natural 36 DDs on her frame...but still had a flat tummy and no handles..
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
Originally posted by: Skoorb
If she's 5,8 I would not be willing to go out with her beyond 150, no matter what. If she's "shapely", then I'd initiate interest at 140.
That's general, because I have seen some attractive girls with the 5,8/150 sort of dimension, but the problem is that you VERY RARELY see a face-hot chick who's got some lbs to lose. Generally their entire body is in line with itself.
Well would you rather go out with a bigger girl with a gorgeous face or a fit-and-trim girl that looks like she got attacked by some sort of large animal?
Originally posted by: SuperSix
"ILoveLamp" from Anchorman? Hehehe
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
Originally posted by: Doboji
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
Originally posted by: Skoorb
If she's 5,8 I would not be willing to go out with her beyond 150, no matter what. If she's "shapely", then I'd initiate interest at 140.
That's general, because I have seen some attractive girls with the 5,8/150 sort of dimension, but the problem is that you VERY RARELY see a face-hot chick who's got some lbs to lose. Generally their entire body is in line with itself.
Well would you rather go out with a bigger girl with a gorgeous face or a fit-and-trim girl that looks like she got attacked by some sort of large animal?
define "bigger"
if bigger means this then I would prefer a beautiful face to a ugly girl with a skinny body.
However if bigger means L=this]http://pics.bbzzdd.com/users/IBJEDI7/newstarsfat.jpg[/L] then aahhhhhh uggggghhhh noooooo ahhhhhh ehhhhh eeeeee
-Max
hahaha no, bigger means like plus-size model bigger, not have to lift someone out of the house with a crane bigger. I can understand why no one would wanna date someone ultra obese, but to me the first one isnt bad at all.
Originally posted by: CVSiN
yah really bad for her back...Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
Damn, 5'6 120 and huge boobs, that's just unhealthy.Originally posted by: CVSiN
Originally posted by: ILoveLamp
What height/weight combo would be the maximum that you would date, and what's the heaviest girl you've ever gone for?
depends on the girls build... if all the weight is in her chest 120-130 is ok on a big busted gal.. as long as she dont have a gut or a nasty butt
there are cute small girls that got a lil weight on them to support a huge natural rack =P ie my wife was 5'6 120 but she was supportting natural 36 DDs on her frame...but still had a flat tummy and no handles..
she was always sore..
Navy Doc said she should have a reduction... but she didnt want one =/