DrPizza
Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Originally posted by: Xavier434
"beneath him" is the most important part there. So many professors are like this and it always pissed me off. God forbid I pay them to teach me and that sometimes requires repetitive learning through lecture and example. Pride sucks.Originally posted by: slsmnaz
I had a calc professor that would solve about half the problem on the board and then write "I.O." and move on to the next problem. After a while someone got the nerve to ask him what IO meant and he explained it meant "Intuitively Obvious". He thought that once he reached that point that it was beneath him to explain any further.
No, once he got to that point, he was wasting the time of 90% of the class to finish the problem. You grew up in a system where they teach and cater to the lowest in the class: high school. It's college now; if you don't know how to finish the rest of the problem, then you have two choices: review the old material that you should have mastered by now on your own, or fail. Generally, the majority of the class knows what to do to finish. And, the better students are grateful because they don't have to sit there wasting time while the teacher caters to the slow kids. (I don't mean to sound harsh.)
Originally posted by: Stoik
In Advanced Math for Engineers class, in Russian accent (talking about Fourier transforms)
"How did so many of you get this problem wrong on test? It so simple, use the equation. I thought that what engineers do best, get equation from mathematician and plug numbers in."
lmao! The rivalry is alive and well at that school.