First! Fusion Net Energy Gain

Page 15 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Mar 11, 2004
23,444
5,847
146

However, E-Cat is onboard.

That's just posting the shit from the other. Which is all any of this is, cyclical shit, of them citing the same empty shit over and over as though its different. And its all the same people that have been doing this same shit for years.

At least what's his face with the eCat shit would post something claiming how the study was run and the inputs/outputs. This is literally just a press release providing no actual info other than one bullshitter claiming he witnessed something (which seems to be all over the place, I've seen others claiming it was 5x, this says 3x, so even this is fishy as fuck at the most basic level).

If the image included is their version of this, their device is in a plastic shell, and its producing electricity from hydrogen plasma? JFC, I hope you guys don't actually believe plasma is forming inside there and not melting the plastic (or even glass if its inside a glass tube inside of the plastic, whilst creating as much electricity as they claim.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
71,951
32,115
136
That's just posting the shit from the other. Which is all any of this is, cyclical shit, of them citing the same empty shit over and over as though its different. And its all the same people that have been doing this same shit for years.

At least what's his face with the eCat shit would post something claiming how the study was run and the inputs/outputs. This is literally just a press release providing no actual info other than one bullshitter claiming he witnessed something (which seems to be all over the place, I've seen others claiming it was 5x, this says 3x, so even this is fishy as fuck at the most basic level).

If the image included is their version of this, their device is in a plastic shell, and its producing electricity from hydrogen plasma? JFC, I hope you guys don't actually believe plasma is forming inside there and not melting the plastic (or even glass if its inside a glass tube inside of the plastic, whilst creating as much electricity as they claim.
Oh, I don't believe a word of it. The press release reads like the ones I get from Canadian mining juniors, utter bullshit. It's really funny when I have personal knowledge of a project and read the crap the mining companies tell their investors. The thing saving these companies is that they don't have an SEC watching them.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
25,385
11,790
136
Oh, I don't believe a word of it. The press release reads like the ones I get from Canadian mining juniors, utter bullshit. It's really funny when I have personal knowledge of a project and read the crap the mining companies tell their investors. The thing saving these companies is that they don't have an SEC watching them.
All I know is that Biberian and another respected person in this field have put their names behind the preliminary results. I don't think we are in Rossi territory, but sadly there are people involved that have had some shady dealings in the past. Some of the doubts surrounding the self sustaining aspect of the project are related to some components breaking down in the power recovery. The problem is that no one has a satisfactory theory about what is actually taking place leading to issues like this.
 
Reactions: igor_kavinski

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,256
9,730
136
Hmm, exciting, but a big grain of salt until the peer-reviewed research is actually published. Skeptical of what amounts to a corporate press release thus far. Still not understanding how “just add water” works so well with this process.
 
Reactions: cytg111

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,035
9,150
136
Still not understanding how “just add water” works so well with this process.
Going to need some details for that "added water". How did they use it, where did they place it, why do they believe it made a difference?
If not, this could all be a lie. Bait to lure in unsuspecting investors.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,222
14,214
136

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
8,011
8,765
136
Startup says there going to build a commercial fusion reactor at a facility near Richmond Virginia, and will plug it into the grid by "the early 2030's." It's almost certainly a huge over-promise. They're not going to get it that right on their first design of a commercial fusion reactor. Nonetheless, I support any sort of funding going toward fusion.

These nobodies are promising something that doesn't exist, in less than a decade.

Someone might want to let Virginia know they're about to get scammed by some "tech bros". Probably a shell company owned by God-Emperor Musk.
 
Reactions: hal2kilo and Zorba

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
25,385
11,790
136
These nobodies are promising something that doesn't exist, in less than a decade.

Someone might want to let Virginia know they're about to get scammed by some "tech bros". Probably a shell company owned by God-Emperor Musk.
Yet, another problem has been identified, if they are using tritium.

 
Reactions: nickqt

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
71,951
32,115
136
Yet, another problem has been identified, if they are using tritium.

I guess I should have been more careful with the tritium I used in grad school. My bad.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,222
14,214
136
These nobodies are promising something that doesn't exist, in less than a decade.

Someone might want to let Virginia know they're about to get scammed by some "tech bros". Probably a shell company owned by God-Emperor Musk.

No, there is zero chance of them actually doing what they're claiming, particularly in the specified timeframe. However, they have "several billion" in funding, which I assume means there are a number of overly credulous investors out there. It's enough money for them to make an attempt at it and produce a failed reactor. Which they will likely figure out at least some of the various reasons it failed before ultimately running out of funding. This could be of use to future ventures. I suspect it will be necessary to build a bunch of failed reactors before we'll ever build a successful one.

I support all funding for fusion research, whether it comes from the public sector or private investment.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |