Saint Nick
Lifer
- Jan 21, 2005
- 17,722
- 6
- 81
I hate the idea of making people play on acoustics with acoustic sized strings, like 11's or even 12's. it's retarded. if you want to learn, learn on light strings, then build strength up to 11's or 12's if you want. if you want to build muscle you don't start with a 50 pound barbell and try to do 1 rep. you start with 20 pounds and do multiple reps, adding weight until you get to 50 pounds.
I kind of agree with this. I learned on an Ovation acoustic with .12 strings- ugh. I would cry from my fingers hurting during practice sometimes. It took months to get callouses built up on my fingertips and I would get pissed if one tore off.
You must have one heck of a long thumb . Thumb over the neck makes for easier bending of notes, ability to add base notes, more comfortable grip for some people. Lots of professional players adopt that grip almost exclusively (Hendrix was one example).
But, it restricts your reach, so wide chords are difficult if not impossible due to the angle of the fingers, and it makes it hard to do bar chords, because you can't physically wrap the thumb over the neck and bar a fret with your index finger. Players that combine both styles usually switch between thumb-over for open chords or picked melodies, and thumb on the back of the neck for bar chords.
I started on what were probably 11s on an acoustic. When i went to electric, it probably came with 9s or 10s. I bought one set of 8s, and promptly broke them. They also sounded way too thin. I started stepping them up, and settled on these in 11...
http://www.deanmarkley.com/products/by-subcategory/2-catalog/283-vintage-electric-re-issue
I especially like them cause they were kind of unbalanced. The bass strings were especially heavy, and it gave it a nice chunky sound. I'd swap the wound third for an unwound. I like heavy strings, and would have used 12s, but they were too heavy for me to handle.
Try these. They may be what you are looking for: