<<
<<
<< Solution: Don't read if you want to figure it out for yourself.
1. If only one person on the island has blue eyes then he can look around and see 99 pairs of brown eyes. Therefore, he knows that he must be the one with the blue eyes and kills himself that night.
2. If two people have blue eyes, then each can look around and see the other person's blue eyes along with the remaining 98 pairs of brown eyes. They both go to sleep that night thinking that the person they see with blue eyes will kill himself like in situation 1 above. However, when both wake up the next morning and see that the other person with blue eyes didn't kill himself, then they know that they themselves must have blue eyes also and therefore both blue-eyed people kill themselves on the second night.
3. If three people have blue eyes then the above reasoning can be used again except now two nights will pass and the three blue-eyed people will kill themselves on the third night.
So in general, all the blue-eyed people will kill themselves on the nth night where n is the number of blue-eyed people on the island. >>
That doesn't work for a number of reasons.
First, the riddle is poorly stated. No one knows for sure that there are blues, so as far as they know, it's possible that no one is blue. Let's say there are 2 blues; let's call them #1 and #2. After a night of rest, they awake to see each other, and everyone else, to be still alive. #1 can easily assume that #2 thinks no one is blue, and #2 can assume the same. So then no one dies.
So, your logic is flawed. Say there are 2 blues and they kill each other (even though they shouldn't. But let's just assume they do, as the answer states). Then, there are 98 ppl left. But after another night, they awake to see all 98 other ppl alive. By your logic (that ppl kill themselves cuz they see no one else has died), what's to prevent the 98th person from assuming that he has blue eyes when he doesn't? Then everyone will keep killing themselves until no one is left.
Also, with 3 blue-eyed people, it is again screwed up. All 100 ppl go to bed, including the 3 blues. Next morning, they wake up. Let's call the blues A, B, and C. A sees that B and C are still alive. He can easily come to the conclusion that B didn't kill himself because B sees C, and C didn't kill himself because C sees B. B can come to the conclusion that A and C are alive because A sees C, and C sees A. While C thinks that B and A are alive because A sees B, and B sees A.
Like I posted earlier, this riddle and its asnwer is flawed in the exact same way that the other similar riddle (involving hats) is flawed.
dfi
EDIT: just read Alrocky's posts, completely agree.
Calbear2000, I'm sorry, but the riddle is flawed. I've heard a variation of this before, came up with the exact same answer you have presented, and realized the answer was flawed.
Btw, I think you'll feel quite ridiculous for questioning Alrocky's intelligence, once you realize that you were the one in error. It's not that the question/answer is difficult to understand; it's that they are simply wrong. >>
Wow this thread is still alive...
Ok, don't get offended if you feel your intelligence is insulted... that is not my intent. I am just questioning your inability to understand the solution, as well as your need to blame your misunderstanding on the wording of the problem.
The solution is correct... on the 10th night, the 10 blue eyes commit suicide. You and the others before you (alrocky and woolmilk) bring up a valid point about the scenario of only 1, 2, or 3 blue eyes, which I agree with. BUT, as clearly stated in the original problem (which you seem to casually and conveniently disregard), there are 10 blues on the island. And I *guess* since shooter's solution describes these exact scenarios of 1, 2, and 3 blues, his answer is technically wrong. But you're being mighty anal if you refuse to realize he was using the case of 1, 2, and 3 as base cases to illustrate the recursive nature of the riddle when it involves 10 blues.
dfi, the only people that look ridiculous here is someone sticking to this reasoning to try and invalidate the answer. >>
It's not the wording of the problem that is the main concern. It is the answer that concerns me.
It's starting to get confusing go back and forth between everyone's post. So instead, I'm going to post how I see this riddle.
This is how I see the riddle:
One possible solution: There are 10 blues. The next morning, a blue awakes to see 9 blues and 90 browns. So, the blue can assume that because the 9 blues are still alive, he himself must be a blue. Therefore, this blue kills himself. HOWEVER, the only way the 10th blue can figure out that he himself is blue, is if he knows that there are 10 blues. Else, a brown can also come to the exact same conclusion as the blue, and therefore, all the browns will end up killing themselves as well.
Another possible solution: After the first night of rest, all 10 blues awake. A blue awakes to see 9 blues and 90 browns. However, this blue assumes that the 9 blues are alive because they don't know they are blue. The 10th blue cannot make a judgment on whether he himself is blue or brown on the ignorance of the blues. Since the 10th blue doesn't know there are 10 blues, he can easily assume that there are 9 blues, and that he is looking at them. Now, each blue can think the same thing, so no one dies.
Would someone care to explain where I've gone wrong?
dfi
Btw, Calbear: I didn't feel my intelligence was insulted. Your original attack was on Alrocky. It seemed to me that you were trying to belittle Alrocky, in a condescending "I can't believe this guy is so stupid that he doesn't understand the problem/answer" attitude. So I merely came to his defense. If that wasn't your intention, fine. That's just the impression I was left with.