JackStorm: yes, exactly.
cruiser1338: you are asking the government to impose a will upon other individuals, thereby violating their right to life. If one individual donates his sperm, or gives a child up for adoption to another individual, you may not interfere with their consentual agreement.
You are grasping for straws when you say that because someone might be bullied, he should be the one to pay. When in fact, the bullies should pay. Surrendering to oppressors - even small ones on the schoolyard - is a bad thing.
You argument stating that they should not be allowed to have children because they cannot concieve them naturally has five fundamental flaws, and the refutations are as following:
1. They have the right to form consentual agreements with other people who can grant them the possibility of having children.
2. They will be able to concieve their own children in a future not far away. This may not by any means be prohibited.
3. You are suggesting that people - individuals - are acting only by the mercy and permission of the state, which is not true. People are to be free to do that which violates no rights, and only that which does so is to be prohibited.
4. There is also an error in suggesting that that which is not "natural" (an arbitrary term) should not only be disliked by outright banned with the threat of batons and jail cells behind it.
5. It is in the nature of humans to overcome natural limitations. Flying across continents, playing games with Koreans and Californians while residing in Sweden, heck, even curing illnesses and delivering otherwise doomed babies into this world would have been unthinkable - and indeed unnatural to the highest degree - in past times.
Now, because of these things and millions more, we are better off.
Furthermore, without the government, people would still have the right to freedom. That right does not come as clemency from the government, and if it violates that right it is better that the government be undone. For it is the undying duty of any legitimate state worth its name, to protect rights, not to trample on them. In the case that this happens, it is like an originally and initially nurturing parent gone bad and abusive: it is time to revolt.