mfenn
Elite Member
You can keep pushing this point, but the fact remains that Intel remains more power efficient, better per clock, doesn't require more expensive RAM, and doesn't need Crossfire (which is gimmicky, stuttery, and often fails) to perform.
If you're getting more expensive RAM and a dGPU, you're only $10-20 off getting Intel+iGPU anyway, which is simpler and works better.
Listen, you can keep advertising Kaveri, but the truth is, Intel is planning to make the same rate of CPU advances and is ahead already; furthermore, Intel's massive budget means I know Intel will deliver, while AMD's smaller size and budget means that they may not.
I'm all for AMD GPUs, but APUs are just not a good idea outside of mobile space.
Agree, not to mention that Kaveri is an as yet unreleased product. Why on earth would you buy a stopgap part and plan to upgrade when you could get the CPU performance (Core i3) and the GPU performance (GCN) today?
Stated another way, Kaveri at best will bring the system to parity with today's low end dGPU. And that would be succeeding beyond AMD's wildest dreams. Why on earth would you place a bet on an upgrade path with uncertain performance when the same expenditure could get you equivalent performance today?