NO it's not, not according to any LEGAL documents I've ever produced, and never according to MS Office. So, where does that leave us? :awe:
Or, are you in the same school that though not capitalizing a word after a period is OK? Right after your leave one space?
First of all--I'm not arguing about what people do, got it? I don't
give a shit.
Second--this is simply to
explain the rule that you guys think you know. You don't, so that is all I'm doing. You claim there is an established rule for this, I'm simply informing you of the established rule. If you take this so seriously, then investigate the history. Investigate the actual rules.
look, the reason people do it is to compensate for the limitations of typewriters, as clearly explained in CZRoe's link, which on one fucking bothered to read. The RULES OF STYLE, typographers and typesetters that have been in this business for 4 centuries set the single space rule long before your great great great grandfather was a single gamete in your great great great great grandfather's ballsac.
The point, is that "two spacing" is a modern convention that was adopted to
compensate for an irregular technology--fixed spacing that typewriters forced onto type. It looked awful.
Maybe 10 people use typewriters now, and while the rules of typeset never changed, people still stick to adapted convention of using typewriters. They assume it's correct, but they never knew the rule. same with legal documents that depend on all sorts of horrible typeset technologies--telefax, those gigantic plastic sheets that were barely legible.
thing is, the accepted rule of style never changed. Two-spacing has not been adopted by any style manual, yet the use remains with modern word processors for whatever reason. That is the rule, and that is all I am saying.
I can sit here and tell you how common misuse, especially with English Grammar, has led to countless conventions, some accepted "officially," some not.
for example--"irregardless" has been added to Webster's, even though it isn't really a word (the meaning is the exact same as regardless--there's no logical reason to accept its misuse, if you know what I mean.) However, b/c one official source appears to have accepted it, it remains a debatable point.
The various manuals of style never accepted two spacing after sentences. So, it is officially, less acceptable than the abomination that is "irregardless."