That's nice, thanks for the info. What does it do?
its funny that the gpu water setting hurts performance even when you cant see any water. lolMakes water extra watery.
its funny that the gpu water setting hurts performance even when you cant even see any water. lol
you can run a card for years with increased voltage/clocks (have you seen how long people kept their oc'ed 8800s ?)
also : http://www.xbitlabs.com/picture/?src=/images/graphics/geforce-gtx-660/zfulltable.png so say what about a max clocked 7870 not being faster than a stock 660ti ?
8800's aren't 7870's
I'd say that's even, wouldn't you? So you've shown with a 24% overclock, and a huge memory overclock the a more expensive 7870 is about even with a stock 660Ti reference card.
:whiste:
As I already said to the OP the only way he's going to be able to run high fps with high graphical settings and PhysX is if he keeps his 460 as a dedicated card. The point has moved towards the 660 Ti being a better card, better value, and better performance option at this point vs the 7870.
I will sell my gtx 460 as soon as I get hands on the new vga.
The radeon does NOT have particle feature, or just not like nvidia does?
I mean, looking at this picture, if its THAT different from physx and without it, I would go with nvidia, but I'm not sure if it works like that, the AMD card will NOT have details like that, or just less details?
no, they really don't . The 640 is demolished by the 7750 at the same price point, the 650 is demolished by the 7770 which around the same price point, the 660 is beaten (not demolished) by the 7870 and IS demolished when they're oc'ed, same thing goes for the 660 ti and 7950 although you can find a 7950 for $260 and oc it past 670 oc levels and by extension the 670 and 7970, and finally the 680 is bested by the 7970 ghz edition . So no nvidia doesn't have any cards worth buying unless you're case constrained .
If you Google it you'll find loads of discussions on PhysX, but pretty much it's a gimmick. The reason so few games have it is NVIDIA pays developers to only develop effects for their cards using their physics engine. That costs a lot of money and also few developers are willing to risk segregating their audiences. Other developers simply code for similar effects using more universal methods. Also, DirectCompute is up and coming which is an open standard and will do what PhysX does and more. Finally, unless you're buying a GTX 680, you'll be hard-pressed to maintain decent frame rates while calculating PhysX at the same time (something NVIDIA conveniently doesn't mention). What does this all mean? Don't buy a card just for PhysX, no matter how much NVIDIA's marketing wants you to (and there are enough members on this board who do just that, check their signatures before you think you're getting an honest answer).Wow, rly 7950 for $260 rly a great deal, I still have 2 weeks to decide though,
I'm still kinda fascinated with the physx effects which amd doesnt have. Gaming gets so realistic, too bad few game titles have physx, or am I wrong?
what's your point ? it was an example of how long gpus can last when overvolted/oc'ed .8800's aren't 7870's
I'd say that's even, wouldn't you? So you've shown with a 24% overclock, and a huge memory overclock the a more expensive 7870 is about even with a stock 660Ti reference card.
:whiste:
As I already said to the OP the only way he's going to be able to run high fps with high graphical settings and PhysX is if he keeps his 460 as a dedicated card. The point has moved towards the 660 Ti being a better card, better value, and better performance option at this point vs the 7870.
what's your point ? it was an example of how long gpus can last when overvolted/oc'ed .
you got your facts wrong dude a 7870 costs less than a 660ti and a little bit more than a 660, BUT here's the difference between the 660 and the 7870 :
When oc'ed 660 is BEATEN by a stock 660ti by an average of more than %7 according to xbitlabs, however the 7870 beats the stock 660ti by about 3% (this is at 1080p without aa) .
But this is all irrelevant the 7950 at 260 is hands down the best way to go 7970ghz/680 performance at a $260 price tag is unmistakably amazing value
Doesn't matter how long you think they lasted, I can show cases of degradation from year old cards, let alone cpus which suffer the same problems.
No you have your facts wrong, the 660 Ti comes with the $60 game the OP is planning to buy already. Try to keep up, the conversation has passed you by.
Do you have a link for an active $260 7950? Lowest I can find on the egg is $280, still not a bad deal but we're outside the OPs budget since he's looking at $230 or less cards. Though if he can swing the extra $110 for the cost of the 7950 and the game, I say go for it!
We're sorry, but we were not able to process your order completely.
The shipping address information we received from PayPal contains non-recognizable
characters. This might cause by the address contains French or Spanish characters.
Unfortunately, Newegg is not able to process this purchase at this time. If you would like to
use PayPal for this purchase, you will need to update your PayPal shipping infomation.
Newegg.com offers a variety of different payment options, from credit/debit cards and checks,
to gift certificates.
To opt for another payment method and proceed with checkout, Click here.
Woooooowwwwww. Absolutely no reason to get anything in the 7870-GTX660Ti-7950-GTX670-GTX 680-7970 GE range now besides this card. What an absolute steal.
What budget? From the OP:Hey why stop there, 670s with BL2 are $300 after cost of the game is deducted.
I mean who cares about your budget...
Wow, rly 7950 for $260 rly a great deal, I still have 2 weeks to decide though,
Listen, it's too bad the 7950 is such a better deal now and I'm sure that throws your NVIDIA fanaticism into all kind of uncomfortable feelings, but you need to go take a time out and stop derailing the OP's thread.The 7950 being quoted is $280, less $20 going through the hassle of selling a game that is bundled with AMD cards and has sold 200,000 copies total, so $260, plus $60 for BL2, 7950 is looking like $320.
Budget's are meant to be utterly destroyed on forums.
What budget? From the OP:
Listen, it's too bad the 7950 is such a better deal now and I'm sure that throws your NVIDIA fanaticism into all kind of uncomfortable feelings, but you need to go take a time out and stop derailing the OP's thread.
Sleeping Dogs isn't a factor since it's not a very good game and not something seemingly the OP was intestested in.
Seems the ol AMD bias is kicking up strong here, I guess it really is true, Nvidia has no real options available after all
Not even when it's faster, and comes with a $60 game you're upgrading for... Making the cost overall lower than buying the game and a 7870.
it's not a very good game? do you have any proof or this is just your personal opinion? the game seems to be popular with many players... with good ratings in reviews and all of that...
I'm personally not all that excited about Borderlands but I can understand that someone would..
I'm not sure OP have absolutely no interest in the $50 game bundled with the other cards, so why not mention if you decided to use Borderlands 2? He didn't even say he is trying to buy Borderlands 2 I think (he used the video as an example of physx)...
the 660 comes with no game, the 7870 comes with a $50 game (the options considered by OP), as the 7950 do, and the 660 Ti comes with a $60 game, but the overall price to pay is higher for the 660 Ti, about the game, for some this might not be so important (I can see someone who wants to wait to expend the extra $60 later, maybe wait for bugs to be fixed, or even pay less when the price naturally drops)
I linked to a $280 7950 that's bundled with a $50 game, where's the link to this $300 GTX 670 you're talking about? Like I said, go take a time out, your personal attacks are derailing this thread and are not a help to the OP.7950 isn't a better deal at $320 vs the $300 670, we both know that
There is no $260 7950 option for the OP, stop filling people with false hope.
I linked to a $280 7950 that's bundled with a $50 game, where's the link to this $300 GTX 670 you're talking about? Like I said, go take a time out, your personal attacks are derailing this thread and are not a help to the OP.