Originally posted by: lowtech
Originally posted by: etech
Originally posted by: drewshin
And that is all complete suposition on your part.
I remember something about innocent until proven guilty. I guess that doesn't apply in this case.
saddam hasnt used wmd's against u.s. troops, i guess you're saying he won't be using them then. innocent until proven guilty?
Saddam was on probation for starting a war and invading Kuwait. The terms of that 'probation' were very specific about what weapons he could have and how he had to prove that those programs had been discontinued. He had banned weapons and had been in breach of the resolution stating the ceasefire terms almost since it was signed.
Roll your eyes all you want, it only proves how little you know about the situation.
So how much do you & I know about the situation, or are you just spouting your administration propaganda?
If you brush the propagandas from everyone aside & look at the reality then war & lost of human lives seemed to be unjust.
It doesn?t really matter if Saddam is a dictator or not, because if he was friendly with the US & let us exploit him then everything is fine. It all comedown to how much money we can make from this war with Iraq.
If your government is so keen on upholding justice and saving the people, then look no further than your own back yard of its dealing with its own people (see how the rich get richer & poor get poorer in your country). Then there are also many other dictators that in this world, such as majority of the South America countries, Middle East, Africa, and Asia that also needed to be reprimand or take out. But, it is not going to happen because these so call dictators are America friends that your are lining your political parties with blood monies.