There are even some AM3+ boards with 64GB memory support, but no modules to max them out. Crucial still doesn't list non-ecc 16GB memory sticks on their web site.
And with DDR4 due out later this year.... :hmm:
Yea I don't see Intel bothering to replace the TIM on non-K parts. They already run well within spec and can't be pushed.
Yeah. For example:Sure those AM3+ boards didnt support server memory?
To reach the maximum 64GB of system memory, memory modules with 16GB capacity or above are required. ASRock will update the memory support list on the official website once these memory modules are available on the market.
They really dont, I have a stock 4770 non K, stock turbo and everything, heavy avx loads will make it throttle (during winter times no less, summer is coming so its bound to get worse).
I am far from the only one.
Yeah. For example:
http://www.asrock.com/mb/AMD/970 Pro3/?cat=Specifications
I am not saying anything, Shintai. And I agree with you, that is the problem with memory suppliers, not with Intel or AMDBut it raises the question again, where are those modules. You cant say Intel is "limiting" if what they are supposed to limit doesnt exist.
But it raises the question again, where are those modules. You cant say Intel is "limiting" if what they are supposed to limit doesnt exist.
They really dont, I have a stock 4770 non K, stock turbo and everything, heavy avx loads will make it throttle (during winter times no less, summer is coming so its bound to get worse).
I am far from the only one.
They really dont, I have a stock 4770 non K, stock turbo and everything, heavy avx loads will make it throttle (during winter times no less, summer is coming so its bound to get worse).
I am far from the only one.
If those numbers (4790K) are correct, I am definitely upgrading to it. Can only guess of its potential OC headroom :awe:This does seem alittle too good to be true tho. But we know soon enough.
This does seem alittle too good to be true tho. But we know soon enough.
Why not?
Maybe you have a bad chip or bad airflow? My 4770k never has dipped below 3.5
It actually regularly sits at 3.8+ for some reason.
This is why we don't judge off one chip but off reviews /batches of chops.
I'm on stock cooling as well.
I'm sure you've checked already, but that sounds more like an issue with the HSF mount than an issue with the processor.
At stock configuration (Vcc, etc) with stock cooling, your 4770 should have no problem sustaining full-load at stock clockspeed indefinitely.
If it doesn't, then you should seek to RMA it the same as you would any other sub-par product.
What you describe is definitely not what Intel expects the product to perform like, something has gone awry and you shouldn't settle for it as is.
I got two large fans spinning air out of the case (case has special vents for this), flow shouldnt be a problem.
This does seem alittle too good to be true tho. But we know soon enough.
Ugh, please don't remind me of the "Let's just tape out the base layer and keep submitting ECOs to the physical designers because they have nothing better to do" BS that I experience everyday at work, just so some management a*shole can claim that "they taped out" :|Given that Haswell Refresh is guaranteed to have a reworked mask set, I'm betting we are going to see a power consumption reduction (which begets a temperature reduction provided the thermal conductivity remains unchanged at the worst) simply due to the layout engineers having had another year to optimize the routings and xtor blocks over that which the original Haswell layout team was given.
>negative pressure
Try turning a fan around.