Well its most likely just going to be a 100mhz clock increase w/ unlock capabilities. Which is just like the other generation refreshes.Keep in mind that +100Mhz for refresh is only confirmed for non-K at this point. K frequencies have not been revealed. They are rolling out the K sku's later than the non-K which is unusual, so it's possible there is a greater difference.
Keep in mind that +100Mhz for refresh is only confirmed for non-K at this point. K frequencies have not been revealed. They are rolling out the K sku's later than the non-K which is unusual, so it's possible there is a greater difference.
"Haswell Refresh products with unlocked multiplier, or "K" versions, will be launched in the third quarter. Also in Q3, Intel is going to release Haswell-E extreme microprocessors."The K model is Broadwell-K.
"Haswell Refresh products with unlocked multiplier, or "K" versions, will be launched in the third quarter. Also in Q3, Intel is going to release Haswell-E extreme microprocessors."
I wouldnt count on that. Its pretty meaningless to release a new Haswell-K model that as such doesnt offer anything over the current K models, only to be made EOL shortly after by Broadwell-K.
I wouldnt count on that. Its pretty meaningless to release a new Haswell-K model that as such doesnt offer anything over the current K models, only to be made EOL shortly after by Broadwell-K.
If you have a 4770 there is no reason to upgrade until Skylake at least. If you have Sandy I'd consider Broadwell at least for the platfrom improvements and overall speed increases. Pretty simple in the end. From a tech perspective its pretty meh.
There's a lot less evidence for broadwell-K than there is for Haswell refresh-K. And again that's an assumption by you that it doesn't offer anything over current K models.
But lets suppose Haswell refresh K, what can it possibly offer over current Haswell?
9 series doesnt offer much vs 8 series.
I for once personally wouldnt care if it was 8 or 9 series, like I for example would with previous versions.
H97 and Z97 will be the only versions of the 9 series. Note that SATA Express is removed.
There's a lot less evidence for broadwell-K than there is for Haswell refresh-K. And again that's an assumption by you that it doesn't offer anything over current K models.
At this point the only Haswell worth holding out for is the 8-core Haswell E.
That 1150 or 2011? :\
Not much, but does it really need to though?
The only evidence you need of Broadwell-K is, there is ZERO reason for having a Series 9/Z97 desktop chipset if there is no Broadwell-K processor in the pipeline as they wouldn't have needed to re-pin Haswell Refresh/wouldn't have re-pinned Haswell refresh if they weren't going to release a Broadwell product. Skylake will clearly be getting a new chipset, as it will support sata express and DDR4 neither of which is supported by Z97. So again, there was no need for Series 9/Z97 if they were not going to bring Broadwell to the desktop. The question is, is Intel going to release Haswell Refresh K in Q3 and Broadwell-K in Q4/Q1 2015. Broadwell K is clearly coming, and its main improvement over Haswell/Haswell Refresh is a smaller process, better performance per watt, and better integrated graphics. Which means its not going to be all that much faster than current processors.
But lets suppose Haswell refresh K, what can it possibly offer over current Haswell? It's still on 22nm process, maybe a bit more refined by now so you maybe get an extra 100MHz. I'm pretty sure Intel won't go back to soldering the ihs if that's what you're thinking.