Not all Republicans are nutters. Some aren't totally delusional, but have to pretend to be to fend off their primary challengers.
Hillary Clinton isn't a pure angel, she just isn't delusional or pretending to be.
the vast majority of today's low information liberals will vote for the hillary simply because she's a woman just like they voted for the half wit in the oval office today. She has the liberal genitalia testicle lock box vote..locked up.
Not all Republicans are nutters. Some aren't totally delusional, but have to pretend to be to fend off their primary challengers.The liberal mind sure is warped.
Every republican is a nutter.
Hillary Clinton is a pure angel.
/s
Not all Republicans are nutters. Some aren't totally delusional, but have to pretend to be to fend off their primary challengers.
Hillary Clinton isn't a pure angel, she just isn't delusional or pretending to be.
Unlike conservatives, who never lie. Because freedom!..she's just a liar. Liberals are very comfortable with liars.
If thats all you got, I'd be damn worried.
Do you want a president that accepts the science on climate change? Do you want a president that accepts macroeconomics 101? Do you oppose massive tax cuts for the rich?
If you do, looks like you're voting for Hillary, because I see no plausible Republican nominee that does any of those three things.
Hillary is more republican than democrat and she will be getting the bulk of her money from the same Wall St sources so I wouldn't hold me breath that she'll be any better for the working class than the republicans.
Sad choices we have...
Brian
If Hillary is a Republican, what are Republicans now? Fascists?
If Hillary is a Republican, what are Republicans now? Fascists?
Unlike conservatives, who never lie. Because freedom!
Pretty much.If Hillary is a Republican, what are Republicans now? Fascists?
If Hillary is a Republican, what are Republicans now? Fascists?
Pretty much.
This is how far down the rabbit hole the libs have fallen.
Let me guess, there's a socialist Muslim Kenyan in the White House, right?This is how far down the rabbit hole the libs have fallen.
Libruuls of course being the true communist fascist atheist muslim Murrica haters!. Because freedom!
Also: Saul Alinksy, Ben Ghazi, birth certificate, death panels, and transcripts!
Libruuls of course being the true communist fascist atheist muslim Murrica haters!. Because freedom!
Also: Saul Alinksy, Ben Ghazi, birth certificate, death panels, and transcripts!
Let me guess, there's a socialist Muslim Kenyan in the White House, right?
Rich coming from two fucktards that think every republican is a fascist.
Rich coming from two fucktards that think every republican is a fascist.
Rich coming from two fucktards that think every republican is a fascist.
One of the things that amaze me beyond belief is the absolute inability of conservatives to handle sarcasm and insults handed there way. I mean, the right spends all day every day attacking and ridiculing democrats and then email each other all the same stuff made up by there leaders but when the table is turned and they get some grief from the left they flat lose it.
The right spends all day every day doing this shit but a little back from the left and they become, as they've always been, cry babies!!!
Brian
Pretty sure you misunderstood his fairly obvious point there.The libs on this board aren't sarcastic. They actually believe the bullshit they word vomit.
Nope. But it was widely reported at the time. Feel free to believe it or not, I don't really care.Can you quote what part of any bill authored by her that would do that?
Here's the 1993 bill for you to look through:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c103:1:./temp/~c103GmfJU5:e257555:
Yeah, we all remember the first President Romney. Oh wait . . .The Clinton's, after one presidency is now a ruling family? Interesting. You certainly didn't hear that kind of talk about Romney, nor about bush jr. But then again you righties have never been consistent
Well, actually, pretty near the mark!
If you look at the balance of policy actions of Bill Clinton and Obama they would be considered right of center in the republican party of the 1970's. The repubs have moved further and further right over the last 30+ years.
Bill Clinton signed GATT, NAFTA and the WTO into law after years of failure by republicans to achieve the same goals.
Back in the 80's the dems were in the wilderness at the national level and were constantly outspent by repubs and often by huge margins. Bill Clinton was one of the dems invited to study the problem and look for a way to make the dems more relevant. His run in 92 displayed his solution ... become an economic republican and give Wall St what they want. And it worked!
The problem is that we now have two parties: republicrats and wacko conservative republicans. There are small differences at the margins and both sides play up the social differences to play to there base.
Meanwhile, the middle class has been set adrift on a raft with no food and water!
Brian
As a licensed and bonded Social Justice Warrior, I'm prepared to do battle.
It will be interesting to see how she holds up to the stress and fatigue of a campaign.