House Passes 1/6 Commission

Page 70 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
14,673
9,564
136
The J6 committee up to this point had done a pretty good job, but I feel like they dropped the ball today especially with all the hype. Should have just focused on what Hutchinson actually heard or was direct witness to (weapons at the rally, they're not here to hurt me, etc, plenty here to unpack). Instead they let her second hand hearsay about some sideshow nonsense become a massive talking point for the RW media system and it risks diluting her entire testimony, or worse yet, calling the entire thing into question. You'd think after 6 years the Dems would have this figured out yet they still continue to look a couple steps behind. Even if the SS agents never testify under the oath, the damage to her credibility is likely done, even if it's a little bit - and more importantly, notice how the attention has been shifted away from the more critical parts of her testimony.

Why even mention the dishes or trying to grab the steering wheel? Seems like going out of their way to take a shot at the guy when instead they need to be focusing on bringing an airtight case against those who organized this thing. Good for a laugh, but at the expense of your witness' credibility? FOCUS.

I don't see any damage to credibility. It's just adding color. The account seems entirely in character with what we've seen of Trump. Demagogic political types are often thuggish and out-of-control in their interpersonal behaviour as well.

Maybe it's "diverting attention" but whose attention? Who are these undecideds who still haven't made up their mind about Trump and the insurrection at this point?
 
Last edited:

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,437
15,354
146
When you have a 25 year female old testifying before congress. You have to ask yourself a couple of questions. Why is she calling these high ranking Trump officials by first names in her deposition. The next question is the insurrection happened a year and a half ago. That would put her at age 23-24. I suspect the purpose for the role in the Trump administration was for other purposes.
Dude really.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
14,673
9,564
136
Out of interest, though, who _did_ take the decision that Trump should not be driven to the Capitol? Why couldn't he order the SS to take him there?
Was the decision taken on the basis of keeping him safe? Does someone in the SS have authority to override a President's own orders when his physical safety is involved? Is that how it works? Or was there a fear he would actually rile the crowd up even more, i.e. the SS was defending democracy _against_ the President?

And I wonder what would have happened if he _had_ gone to the Capitol. Seems pretty likely he'd have ended up even more massively legally-implicated in the whole thing than he is. Maybe they should have taken him - would have been quite something to see him joining in the chants of 'Hang Mike Pence'.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,437
15,354
146
It has amazed me since I first heard him announce his candidacy in 2015 that anyone could not see who this man is. To anyone who has paid any fucking attention whatsoever, not one thing he has done is the slightest bit surprising. Even the small stuff like throwing food when he's angry, like a child throwing a trantrum. I mean, HRC said it, in 2016, "Donald Tump is tempermentally unfit to be President of the United States." My first thought when I heard that was, well DUH.
You are absolutely right that his temperament was out there for all to see before November 2016. It’s just that it had absolutely no impact on his voters.

He said denigrating things about Hispanic immigrants on TV and Twitter. Many of his voters thought finally someone who knows how much damage these immigrants are doing - taking our jobs and gangs bringing drugs and guns into our kids schools putting our kids at risk.

He said denigrating things about Muslims too. His voters thought this guy gets it. They are terrorists who want to shoot and blow up Americans and die while doing it. Don’t let them in the country.

He was a “billionaire” & a “deal maker” on that TV show. He was going to save this country from bankruptcy. Why he could probably just wipe out the debt from his own bank accounts.

He was angry and they were angry. He hated all the things they hated.

So the fact that he had absolutely no leadership qualities and has skirted business laws his entire life had absolutely no bearing on their desire to vote for him.
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,833
2,620
136
While I make no claim to be any sort of expert on the Presidents various Limousines or SUV’s or whatever modes of transportation that require a driver. I do imagine them all having video cameras in them.

If every President since Nixon has learned one thing, it is that NOTHING is taped or transcribed unless they specifically authorize it. And since Donnie has always admired (and even copied much of his presidency after Tricky Dick) it is absolutely inconceivable to me that there would be any sort of internet video or audio recording system inside the Presidential limo.
 
Reactions: hal2kilo

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
14,673
9,564
136
yes, that's their entire job.

Well I don't think that's their _entire_ job. Most of their job is to protect the President against outside threats. Protecting a President against his (or her) own foolishness is presumbably a relatively-minor, even rare, part of the job. And one which, I would presume, involves tradeoffs, as it means potentially going directly against a President's orders and even causing them some other, non-physical, form of harm.

And in this case, it's still not clear whether the reasoning was fear of some threat to Trump at the Capitol, or the potential threat his presence might cause to others.
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,162
136
After all of this I want to know what Trump has on the people around him to control people as he does?
Is he a witch with magical powers? Does Trump have naked pictures of his supporters and of the entire Fox news staff? Does Donald pay them off? So whats the deal with this blind Trump loyalty?
As expected, Fox is calling Cassidy Hutchinson a liar. Fox is mimicking Donald Trump's words. What else can Fox do?

Funny how Fox is digging their own grave. The committee would not have called a special session with Cassidy Hutchinson unless the the committee has future witnesses who will validate the testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson.
This is like John Dean describing his meeting with Richard Nixon, then in later days we found out about the tapes. I have a feeling the committee has tapes, or video, but before the committee released that evidence they first had to get Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony on record.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,236
14,236
136
You are absolutely right that his temperament was out there for all to see before November 2016. It’s just that it had absolutely no impact on his voters.

He said denigrating things about Hispanic immigrants on TV and Twitter. Many of his voters thought finally someone who knows how much damage these immigrants are doing - taking our jobs and gangs bringing drugs and guns into our kids schools putting our kids at risk.

He said denigrating things about Muslims too. His voters thought this guy gets it. They are terrorists who want to shoot and blow up Americans and die while doing it. Don’t let them in the country.

He was a “billionaire” & a “deal maker” on that TV show. He was going to save this country from bankruptcy. Why he could probably just wipe out the debt from his own bank accounts.

He was angry and they were angry. He hated all the things they hated.

So the fact that he had absolutely no leadership qualities and has skirted business laws his entire life had absolutely no bearing on their desire to vote for him.

Right, it was never going to have any bearing on them, but what's most important here is that they do not acknowledge it at all. It's completely rationalized. It's not like they're saying, sure, he's an immature, narcissistic man child with no moral compass whatsoever, but we're going to vote for him because we agree on the issues. They are completely delusional about him. I mean, they actually believed him when he said the election was stolen, after he lied 20+ times per day, every day, for years.
 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,162
136
I personally hope that Trump doesn't run again. I also hope that Biden or Harris don't run either. I would find it hard to vote for Trump again, Biden is past his use by date and Kamala Harris is worthless by any measure. I can't imagine she being President of the US.

You say you'll change the Constitution
Well, you know
We all want to change your head
You tell me it's the institution
Well, you know
You'd better free your mind instead
But if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao
You ain't going to make it with anyone anyhow
 
Reactions: pcgeek11

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,236
14,236
136
Mostly stuff we knew. Orange monkey didn’t care about hang pence chants. SS the morning of saw many people were armed but weren’t allowed past metal detectors for the rally. Orange monkey told them remove the detectors, let them all in. The new part, when SS told him they couldn’t secure the scene to allow him to march to the capitol, he grabbed at the steering wheel in attempt to take control and tried to strange his SS head. But meadows totally indifferent in the day. Didn’t want to bother the orange monkey in the residence. She wasn’t in the room with him though during the afternoon

The most damning thing was the metal detectors, by far. He knew they were armed. His security had already confiscated weapons. And he heard SS reports of firearms. Then he tells them to turn off the detectors, knowing they would be marching on the capital. The reason this is important is that it goes straight to the issue of intent.

If I'm prosecuting Trump, I'm going to argue that this, in conjunction with Trump's comments about the rioters being right to want to kill Pence, and his inaction, is direct evidence that violence is exactly what Trump intended. The best his defense could do under these facts is to argue that he was merely reckless, that he just didn't care and that isn't a crime. But I think a good prosecutor could get a jury to buy in to straight intent here. Like this: "the defense claims that Trump was just indifferent to violence, but was Trump truly indifferent to anything that went on that day? Not a chance. He either wanted violence or he did not. Look at the evidence and decide which best fits the facts."

One thing you left out, probably because it likely won't affect Trump directly, is the witness intimidation evidence they showed. At least one e-mail there is a slam dunk felony. You do NOT say things like that to anyone about to testify under oath. In any event, prosecution or no, it was a smart strategy to show that to the public because it's likely to discourage further tampering.
 
Last edited:

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,162
136
I'll say it again. I fully suspect the committee has plenty of witnesses lined up to validate everything Cassidy Hutchinson testified to. That includes Trump grabbing the steering wheel of THE BEAST. The secret service may have additional information or a slightly different version of what happened in THE BEAST, but in the end after further testimony the version from Cassidy Hutchinson will remain intact. Secret service may use difference wording when referring to "grabbed" as "lurched". And referring to Trump's hand around the neck to Trump's hand around the shoulder. But the original testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson will remain above reproach.
Lets see how Fox twists THAT....
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
16,793
15,807
146
The fact that he thinks we needed a crystal ball to predict that Trump would do shitty things is pretty telling. Especially considering the fact that he was here on these forums in 2015 when we were shouting from the roof tops that Trump would do shitty things.

Anyways he's completely missing the point, it's not about "needing a crystal ball" to know what would happen in the future, it's about reflecting on what has happened in the past and acknowledging that you had poor judgement and made a mistake. That is how you grow as a person and avoid making a similar mistake in the future without the need of a crystal ball. Not surprisingly this is a foreign concept to him and millions of his peers.
He doesn't need a crystal ball, he needs a mirror.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,070
19,779
146
He doesn't need a crystal ball, he needs a mirror.
Where's starbuck when you need him. He had plenty of mirrors and bullshit laying around.

Guy like pcgeek are unreachable. The cognitive dissonance is too much, especially as we age. Challenging one's reality and allowing factual information IN is very difficult for many, especially the older population

Assuredly, if Trump is to run and get nominated again....pcgeek will most certainly vote for him. He STILL contends Trump was a better choice than HRC
 
Last edited:

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,348
53,962
136
The J6 committee up to this point had done a pretty good job, but I feel like they dropped the ball today especially with all the hype. Should have just focused on what Hutchinson actually heard or was direct witness to (weapons at the rally, they're not here to hurt me, etc, plenty here to unpack). Instead they let her second hand hearsay about some sideshow nonsense become a massive talking point for the RW media system and it risks diluting her entire testimony, or worse yet, calling the entire thing into question. You'd think after 6 years the Dems would have this figured out yet they still continue to look a couple steps behind. Even if the SS agents never testify under the oath, the damage to her credibility is likely done, even if it's a little bit - and more importantly, notice how the attention has been shifted away from the more critical parts of her testimony.

Why even mention the dishes or trying to grab the steering wheel? Seems like going out of their way to take a shot at the guy when instead they need to be focusing on bringing an airtight case against those who organized this thing. Good for a laugh, but at the expense of your witness' credibility? FOCUS.
You claimed her testimony changed zero minds so why do you care anyway?
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,614
30,890
146
The fact that he thinks we needed a crystal ball to predict that Trump would do shitty things is pretty telling. Especially considering the fact that he was here on these forums in 2015 when we were shouting from the roof tops that Trump would do shitty things.

Anyways he's completely missing the point, it's not about "needing a crystal ball" to know what would happen in the future, it's about reflecting on what has happened in the past and acknowledging that you had poor judgement and made a mistake. That is how you grow as a person and avoid making a similar mistake in the future without the need of a crystal ball. Not surprisingly this is a foreign concept to him and millions of his peers.

exactly, this whole "I have no regrets" thing. I've never met a person anywhere that claims to have no regrets, and is also not one of the dumbest people I've ever known.

Being proud of having "no regrets" means you haven't learned dick about anything as you stumble through life, wondering why all your decisions have been terrible and your life is still shitty....of course it must be someone else's fault that you are miserable, because you of course have "no regrets!"
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,614
30,890
146
He doesn't need a crystal ball, he needs a mirror.

well, geek said he would "find it hard to vote for Trump again." Of course he'll do it without thinking, especially if a black woman is running against him, as he said. He may "hold his nose" while voting for the Trumpsterfire, but he'll of course also have "no regrets" about it. ...because black woman! duh!
 

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126


After Monday's hearing, i thought Trump Unhinged would be a great book title.

google says i'm 4 years late.
Trump's former Director of Communications, Omarosa, wrote her book in 2018.

Holy batshit crazy, Batman!
Can't wait for the next hearing.

Bonus: Tying Trump to Putin
 

gothuevos

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2010
3,159
2,305
136
You claimed her testimony changed zero minds so why do you care anyway?

You could argue that the entire committee's work, while vital, will probably change zero minds. This is probably true of all politics as of 2016.

Doesn't mean that they should expose their witnesses to RW media attacks.
 
Reactions: hal2kilo and iRONic

thilanliyan

Lifer
Jun 21, 2005
12,015
2,235
126
No I didn't. Don't blame me if your reading skills are lacking.

You asked if I had any regrets and I answered in my response as quoted here:

"I don't have "regrets" about anything. Unfortunately I don't have a crystal ball and cannot fore tell the future as many on the left seem to claim they are able to do. "
If you couldn't tell Trump was a narcissistic, dangerous, corrupt dirtbag from the get go, maybe you should question your sources of information.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: DarthKyrie and DaaQ

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,173
31,024
136
exactly, this whole "I have no regrets" thing. I've never met a person anywhere that claims to have no regrets, and is also not one of the dumbest people I've ever known.

Being proud of having "no regrets" means you haven't learned dick about anything as you stumble through life, wondering why all your decisions have been terrible and your life is still shitty....of course it must be someone else's fault that you are miserable, because you of course have "no regrets!"

Know who sells has never had regrets, specifically has never done ANYTHING in life that needs forgiveness? You guessed it…

 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,348
53,962
136
You could argue that the entire committee's work, while vital, will probably change zero minds. This is probably true of all politics as of 2016.

Doesn't mean that they should expose their witnesses to RW media attacks.
The idea that it is impossible to change minds is demonstrably false and flies in the face of real world outcomes. I imagine your dumb 2020 election prediction was based on this idea and it seems you have learned nothing.

Regardless, that was not your point - your argument was that mentioning the steering wheel or whatever made her testimony ineffective. Considering you already said the entire thing is ineffective that doesn’t matter.

I guess this all makes sense when I think about your claims about republicans as a form of projection. You know you’re irrational and nothing can change your mind so you think everyone else is as nuts as you are.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,173
31,024
136
Checked FnF this morning. Fox is now attempting to ignore the story. Only their so called hard news shows will mention it without comment but omit the confiscated guns. That was a right wing defense for there was no coup attempt
 
Reactions: hal2kilo

eelw

Lifer
Dec 4, 1999
10,215
5,323
136
You could argue that the entire committee's work, while vital, will probably change zero minds. This is probably true of all politics as of 2016.

Doesn't mean that they should expose their witnesses to RW media attacks.
But that’s the sad state of the American voter, not looking past personal issues (inflation) and willing to potentially reeelect that clown show or even reelect people that helped in his corruption. Well if too stupid to vote D in November, burn it all down. Hopefully what rises from the ashes it a somewhat decent society
 
Reactions: uclaLabrat
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |