The J6 committee up to this point had done a pretty good job, but I feel like they dropped the ball today especially with all the hype. Should have just focused on what Hutchinson actually heard or was direct witness to (weapons at the rally, they're not here to hurt me, etc, plenty here to unpack). Instead they let her second hand hearsay about some sideshow nonsense become a massive talking point for the RW media system and it risks diluting her entire testimony, or worse yet, calling the entire thing into question. You'd think after 6 years the Dems would have this figured out yet they still continue to look a couple steps behind. Even if the SS agents never testify under the oath, the damage to her credibility is likely done, even if it's a little bit - and more importantly, notice how the attention has been shifted away from the more critical parts of her testimony.
Why even mention the dishes or trying to grab the steering wheel? Seems like going out of their way to take a shot at the guy when instead they need to be focusing on bringing an airtight case against those who organized this thing. Good for a laugh, but at the expense of your witness' credibility? FOCUS.
I don't see any damage to credibility. It's just adding color. The account seems entirely in character with what we've seen of Trump. Demagogic political types are often thuggish and out-of-control in their interpersonal behaviour as well.
Maybe it's "diverting attention" but whose attention? Who are these undecideds who still haven't made up their mind about Trump and the insurrection at this point?
Last edited: