This benchmark simulates user actions for adding, completing, and removing to-do items using multiple examples in TodoMVC. Each example in TodoMVC implements the same todo application using DOM APIs in different ways. Some call DOM APIs directly from ECMAScript 5 (ES5), ECMASCript 2015 (ES6), ES6 transpiled to ES5, and Elm transpiled to ES5. Others use one of eleven popular JavaScript frameworks: React, React with Redux, Ember.js, Backbone.js, AngularJS, (new) Angular, Vue.js, jQuery, Preact, Inferno, and Flight. Many of these frameworks are used on the most popular websites in the world, such as Facebook and Twitter. The performance of these types of operations depends on the speed of the DOM APIs, the JavaScript engine, CSS style resolution, layout, and other technologies.
Because, we're CPU bottlenecked before anything else.Why is this is in the CPU section ?
Extensions definitely effect your scores, that's why its best to disable everything before running this benchmark. They all take CPU cycles. 30 is a little on the low side, considering your CPU is still decent, how does your chrome://gpu look like? Maybe try forcing GPU acceleration on it? via chrome://flags. Force everything you can so it looks like this. You might still have some red flags left and that's fine.Not sure if this is a good or bad score I'm gonna assume bad based on other posters scores though. I use the latest version of Chrome with some extensions enabled. Anyway, here is my score for better or worse I guess.
Oh god, what are you running there? A TI calculator?This is like golf right? So lower is better?
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU M 520 @ 2.40GHz
VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02)
Will try home machine another time when I'm home.
Not bad at all, myself still running a T7600 with GMA 950, very similar to your box. Still very much usable. Let me bench it in a moment.latest Chrome under Windows 10 1909 x86, C2D e7300 (2.66GHz), GMA 950 IGP 24.20
Edge (old one, not Chromium) 18.1
not as bad as I expected given how slow the UI performance is on this PC.
Oh god, what are you running there? A TI calculator?
Something's wrong, well... this is what happens when you don't have compatible VGA drivers installed. CPU can't do everything alone these days.
Thanks for the scores. It looks like only Edge 84+ (dev channel) has those improvements that result in ~10% speed advantage over Chrome 85. Make sure you are on the dev channel. Makaveli confirms it. But yeah, user experience is very similar. Edge does eat less into your ram, though.Same CPU, Pentium G3258 with Intel iGPU at 4.2G
Disabled all Chrome extensions and did a retest
View attachment 21903
Chrome based MS Edge is actually a bit slower. Also no extensions.
View attachment 21906
A lot of businesses really are still using antiques at the office.Office grade laptop, so yeah, kind of a piece of crap on performance side. That and I'm running Linux (this is a secondary machine not my main one) and Linux seems to suck in the hardware acceleration department and won't really take full advantage of GPU hardware, so I bet on my home machine with an actual good GPU I won't get any better.
Not a lot. Haswell at 3.7Ghz gets you ~110 score in Edge 84 and your boosting much higher than that.i7 8850H on a MacBook Pro 15" 2018 running latest Safari and Catalina.
Much better, anything above 40 leads to decent web browsing, in my experience.e5408 @ 2.5GHz (LGA 771 adapted to LGA 775), Windows 10 x64 1909, Radeon HD4670, Chromium Edge 82: 44.8
i5 2310 (desktop CPU), windows 10 x64 1903, Radeon HD 7850, Chromium Edge dev 84: 61.8
Because, we're CPU bottlenecked before anything else.