I am declaring Jihad

[Zwingle]

<< so many people belive that the only unjust deaths were the ones in the WTC and the Pentagon, the Afghan civilians are just deaths because its just a war and civilian deaths is expected in a war. >>



They are ALL casualties of war....a war started long ago by the US. |No flames please|
This as all been hashed before...why bring it up again?
The US sucks at foreign policy....so what...nothing new....we make sanctions against nations that will not bow and listen to the US....where is that fair. Iraq cannot build its own nukes because the US says so....real fair. Yet the US continues to have it own nukes.

 

Iraq cannot build its own nukes because the US says so....real fair. Yet the US continues to have it own nukes.

Ok,let them build them,I hope you are the first to be incinerated when he drops them on us.

 

[zeeb]

well, i'll call you mom liket he other people. I think you're post is kinda selfish. So people dont always have the right info, or have weird ideas, but it shows that they care about there country. Where the patriotism, all you're doing is thinking about yourself

 

[GasX]

<< They are ALL casualties of war....a war started long ago by the US. |No flames please| >>

The fact that you put a "No flames Please" comment after such a loaded statement doesn't get you off the hook. WTF are you talking about? Osama Bin Laden is a power crazed psycho path who kills civilians and justifies it by saying they pay taxes to a regime I hate. And what action by the US started this war? I am waiting expectantly for your answer. It should make for some interesting conversation...


<< This as all been hashed before...why bring it up again? >>

Because f-tards like you make statements like "The US is to blame for 9/11 and please don't flame me for saying it!"


<< The US sucks at foreign policy....so what...nothing new....we make sanctions against nations that will not bow and listen to the US....where is that fair. Iraq cannot build its own nukes because the US says so....real fair. Yet the US continues to have it own nukes. >>

Well, certainly the U.S. makes some big mistakes now and again, but how about the Cold War. We won that without firing a shot. That's a BIG victory in my book.

 

[Texmaster]

<< Texmaster,
What the hell are you talking about???
I wrote this
-1000 people less.. there is a difference.. about 1000 lives
You wrote this
-So the loss of American lives means LESS? My God who is raising you.
How in the world can you get out of that that I think american lives mean less? My post clearly states that it matters that 1000 less people died and it matters because there are 1000 more people alive than was thought at first, thats a good thing you know. >>



Nice try Czar but it still doesn't address why you felt the NEED to correct the original poster.

Your first comment set the tone of your posts:

Oh yeah... well I declare a Crusade on you

In other words you took his accusations Personally regardless of your little wink pic and you were going to correct him regardless of how it makes you look as if you are trivializing the American losses by correcting his figures then adding the number of "foreign deaths"



<< Where were you?, we couldnt do anything. Where were you when the NA alliance did the same the taliban did, and now they are heroes in the eyes of the uninformed world:disgust: >>



I'm not the one championing the weak and oppressed in Afganistan, YOU ARE.

And if you are going to put on that cape you are responsible for addressing the Talaban's atrocities against the people of Afganistan.

Unless you are only interested in making Americans look bad.

But NOOOOO you wouldn't be trying to do that with these posts yet AGAIN would you? LOL Reading like a book as usual Czar.

 

[Lucky]

Anyone talking sh*t on this topic - look out.




Oooh, whatchu gonna do? Im scarrrrrrrrrrrred!

 

[Texmaster]

<< Anyone talking sh*t on this topic - look out.




Oooh, whatchu gonna do? Im scarrrrrrrrrrrred! >>




Oh God, Luckster. Can't you see he is just letting off frustration?

 

[Zwingle]

Roger - I understand the reason why....but that still does not mean it is right. A gov't does have the right to protect itself......I agree that Saddam is more likely to use them.....but the US should not be able to tell him he can't....sort of like "do as I say, not as I do" double standard.

 

[Pepsi90919]

<< So the loss of American lives means LESS? >>

What is so special about American lives? A lot of people from around the world died in the disaster, maybe it's you who's being insensitive. You just want a reason to bitch out Czar, and he didn't even say anything.

 

[Lucky]

<<

<< Anyone talking sh*t on this topic - look out.




Oooh, whatchu gonna do? Im scarrrrrrrrrrrred! >>




Oh God, Luckster. Can't you see he is just letting off frustration? >>





By making meaningless threats on an internet forum?

 

[rudder]

Iraq cannot build its own nukes because the US says so....real fair. Yet the US continues to have it own nukes.

Well what is the difference between Iraq, Pakistan, North Korean, etc. and the United States. Pakistan has nukes. But they have an unstable government which could change hands overnight. Same with the other countries. We get to play with nukes because our military has a sense of honor and responsibility. Radical extremists trying to stage a coup d'tat in the U.S. are not a threat and our nukes are safe. Yes it is fair.

 

[Random Variable]

<< Iraq cannot build its own nukes because the US says so....real fair. Yet the US continues to have it own nukes. >>


You're stupid. :|

 

[Texmaster]

<<

<<

<< Anyone talking sh*t on this topic - look out.




Oooh, whatchu gonna do? Im scarrrrrrrrrrrred! >>




Oh God, Luckster. Can't you see he is just letting off frustration? >>





By making meaningless threats on an internet forum? >>



LOL So you taunt him? I thought you were more mature than that.

 

[Lankin]

Its perfectly fair, they agreed to destroy their bio and chemical weapons stockpiles and not continue with their nuclear program after they got rolled over in '91. They signed and have since renegged. Thats why they have sanctions, thats why we have bombed them 18 different times since '91. They continue to defy their cease fire agreement..

 

It's a real shame that this country is going to waste with all these wuss anti-war politics. If someone picks on you in school, you kick their ass or chances are that they will do it again and again.

Worse wars have been fought, more lives have been lost. This war is just, plain and simple. Let them come f' with your city and see how you like it. I live 2 miles from the WTC. Maybe when they bomb your town you will change your tune.

 

[GasX]

<< By making meaningless threats on an internet forum? >>

Is there any other kind of thread in ATOT?

 

[Texmaster]

<<

<< So the loss of American lives means LESS? >>

What is so special about American lives? A lot of people from around the world died in the disaster, maybe it's you who's being insensitive. You just want a reason to bitch out Czar, and he didn't even say anything. >>



ROFLOL!!! This is a new one. How am I being insenitive? The post was adressing the biggest loss of American life by terrorism, PERIOD.

Thats it, nothing more.

You want to talk about other deaths in other countries? Start another THREAD. Using them as a deversion tecnique in a vain attempt to win an unwinable arguement is pathetic at best.

 

[Pepsi90919]

Mwilding: um, yes...

 

[Pepsi90919]

<< The post was adressing the biggest loss of American life by terrorism, PERIOD. >>

There you go again.

Q: "How am I being insenitive?"
A: "You want to talk about other deaths in other countries? Start another THREAD."

 

[Texmaster]

<<

<< The post was adressing the biggest loss of American life by terrorism, PERIOD. >>

There you go again.

Q: "How am I being insenitive?"
A: "You want to talk about other deaths in other countries? Start another THREAD." >>



Thats called sticking to the point of the topic pee-brain. And please explain how starting another thread isn't the right thing to do by discusssing a COMPLETELY different subject?

Explain that.

 

Zwingle


We can't or we shouldn't ?

LOL !

I am not going to continue this senseless debate with you,you can believe what you want to believe.

 

[Pepsi90919]

jesus christ, you're on a roll.

it's not a completely different subject, first of all, second, i was more concerned about providing you with an example of insensitivity.

'pee-brain' ... that's cute, but i'm not in 2nd grade.

 

[Texmaster]

<< jesus christ, you're on a roll.

it's not a completely different subject, first of all, >>



LOL!! Really. Then please show us all where in that first post he addresses the Afgan civilizan casualities. And dont get off on a tangent that he SHOULD have addressed them. Just answer the simple question if you believe its the same subject, please show us all where he adressed it.

And dont run away.



<< second, i was more concerned about providing you with an example of insensitivity. >>



BINGO! You just made my point. You dont want to argue the facts, what you and others like you want to do is when a subject you can't defend comes up, instead of addressing that issue, you try to create a new one. Its the oldest and most pathetic form of debating.



<< 'pee-brain' ... that's cute, but i'm not in 2nd grade. >>



Sorry didn't mean to suggest you were older than you really are.

 

[Pepsi90919]

<< Its the oldest and most pathetic form of debating. >>

Oh, really. Stupid me, I thought this was:



<< Thats called sticking to the point of the topic pee-brain. >>





<< Then please show us all where in that first post he addresses the Afgan civilizan casualities. >>

WTF? Afghan civilian casualties? I was talking about everyone who died in the WTC disaster not "Afghan civilian casualties."

And stop this "us" crap like you have some kind of crusade behind you. I'm talking to you and you only.

 

[Texmaster]

<< WTF? Afghan civilian casualties? I was talking about everyone who died in the WTC disaster not "Afghan civilian casualties." >>



So you are asking why American Casualities mean more? Please show us where he said that. And back it up with a DIRECT QUOTE from his first posting.

Once again you are trying to change the subject by putting words in other's mouths that were never spoken.




<< And stop this "us" crap like you have some kind of crusade behind you. I'm talking to you and you only. >>



The "us" is everyone reading this thread laughing at you make a fool of yourself time and time again