"I hate gay people"

[K1052]

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Wow this thread is still going. Why? lol

Because you touch yourself at night.

 

[tealk]

Gay is not Ok

 

[slurmsmackenzie]

Originally posted by: mugs

Originally posted by: Oceandevi

Originally posted by: mugs

Originally posted by: Oceandevi

Originally posted by: Chryso

Originally posted by: K1052

I don't doubt the stats, but I wondered why a straight guy would be concerned about it or the perception enough to refuse to live there. If anything I'd think the women hunting would be easier because of it.

That is exactly the way I look at it. More gay men per capita = less competition for straight women for me. It's a no lose situation. The only thing I don't understand about gay men is the not liking women part. I am not bothered by their liking men. I just can't wrap my mind around the not liking women part.

Bend over in front of a mirror, that what gay dudes like... yummy eh? :disgust:

1. Some straight guys like that too. They just like it to be less hairy.
2. The vagina is not all that attractive...

Tell us more. You seem to have some hidden urges regarding your sexuality.

Yeah man, you got me. :roll:

You think straight people don't have anal sex? You're wrong.

Have you ever heard a guy talk about how good a girl's vagina looks? Ass, legs, breasts, face, these things guys find attractive in a woman. Vagina? Eh... not so much.

speak for yourself, fruit salad. i'll spend more time face down in a muff than i will jiggling an a$$ or titties with the in and out. nothing like a good beef curtain to nibble on before getting down to brass tacks. you're naive if you think a majority of men don't find the vagina attactive for it's pungant odor and unique look. but i agree in a sense, i'll tongue punch the brown star while i'm spreadin' the curtain.

also, aidanjm....

i appreciate your views on genetics and it's affect on homosexuality, but studies have shown conclusively (and you and i have argued this to death before) that there are too many factors that affect a person's sexuality that a true cause, genetic or enviornmentally stimulated, can't be determined. end of story. we'll never be sure.

and whoever said i'm retarded for bringing up gay monkeys needs to elaborate. "are you fscking retarded" isn't a very arguable stance. but if you're interested, look it up. monkeys use sex as a substitute for violence. instead of gloves off fisticuffs, it's pants down monkey lovin'. saves a would be loss of an important male presence in the community thereby allowing for more instances of procreation of male/female sex (in case you were wondering where babies came from, cuz lord knows the only way two dudes are gonna have a kid is if they adopt and sed teenage slut still needs a HS boy to knock her up).

 

[slurmsmackenzie]

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: slurmsmackenzie

Originally posted by: aidanjm

Originally posted by: daveymark

Originally posted by: DigDug
Its always funny to see a black homophobe. You'd think the a$$ would realize the parallel.

it's even funnier to see people try to compare the plight of blacks to that of gays

why is it funny? there are plenty of parallels between society's historical treatment of black people and society's treatment of gay people. Lack of access to marriage is just one similarity. Obviously there are differences as well.

well, there's plenty of parallels between the lifestyles of gays and langur monkeys, but as you say, there are also many differences. i wouldn't throw them together into the same catagory.... (that is unless i was trying to trump up some lame "gay gene" argument.....LMFAO@ME)

analogies are useful because they illuminate a point or reveal some truth. I think a comparison of society's treatment of black people and gay people can be very telling.

people who bristle at the comparison are often bigots who don't want to be called on their bigotry.

how about society's treatment of murderers and the fact that a predisposition to such can be linked back to early childhood? are we bigots for putting them in jail?
how about drugs users and the fact that prenatal drug use was obviously beyond their control. what leniency do we grant them as drug offending adults later in life?

often bigots is a broad statement and an excellent means to refute an argument without even having to address it.

 

[Zysoclaplem]

Originally posted by: K1052

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Wow this thread is still going. Why? lol

Because you touch yourself at night.

I have no need to touch myself anymore.

 

[meltdown75]

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Wow this thread is still going. Why? lol

it was just posted yesterday and it is a recent news story?

 

[Zysoclaplem]

Originally posted by: meltdown75

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Wow this thread is still going. Why? lol

it was just posted yesterday and it is a recent news story?

I figured it would have been locked by now.

 

[slurmsmackenzie]

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: meltdown75

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Wow this thread is still going. Why? lol

it was just posted yesterday and it is a recent news story?

I figured it would have been locked by now.

i'm trying my best, zyso

 

[Zysoclaplem]

Originally posted by: slurmsmackenzie

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: meltdown75

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem
Wow this thread is still going. Why? lol

it was just posted yesterday and it is a recent news story?

I figured it would have been locked by now.

i'm trying my best, zyso

Well try harder!

 

[Toonces]

Originally posted by: slurmsmackenzie

speak for yourself, fruit salad. i'll spend more time face down in a muff than i will jiggling an a$$ or titties with the in and out. nothing like a good beef curtain to nibble on before getting down to brass tacks. you're naive if you think a majority of men don't find the vagina attactive for it's pungant odor and unique look. but i agree in a sense, i'll tongue punch the brown star while i'm spreadin' the curtain.

that was the most romantic thing I've heard this month...

 

[Rob9874]

Originally posted by: Wheezer

Originally posted by: johnjohn320

Originally posted by: Carbo
Good for him. Nothing wrong with expressing an opinion. Is there? I find it amusing that the liberals whine about how intolerant the "unenlightened" are, yet don't tolerate an opinion that differs from their own.

Forget opinions. Homophobes ignore the science that has all but proven homosexuality is biological. Course, what could we expect? These are often the same people that ignore the science of global warming, or ignore the science of geology/carbon dating/friggin' dinosaurs...Maybe social conservatives are really just anti-science.

lol...wtf does science have to do with it?...nothing

Scientific fact: dogs are 4 legged, fury mammals.

Many people like dogs because they are friendly, obedient, devoted and playful. Dog owners often look upon their dogs as an extension of their families.

So what?

I hate dogs.

They are stupid, slobbery and smell bad when they get wet. I hate to clean up after them.

The scientific facts of what dogs are, and why they are dogs is irrelevant to the fact that I do not like them.

Just because something is scientifically true and accurate does not mean you have to accept it and like it.

Believe it or not you can understand the science of something and accept it as true facts and still not like it.

I like that illustration! I too hate dogs. I hope I'm not attacked by dog lovers.

It's strange how you're allowed to choose which animals you like and which you dislike, but you're required to like all humans. Why?

 

[classy]

I don't understand the "parallel" of being black and what that has to do with being gay? Its like people lay at the feet of every black person that because they are black they have to support gays. Its the dumbest argument I have ever seen in support of being a homosexual. I guess all jews, hispanics, women, midgets, fat people, ugly people, and we can throw in muslims now too, guess anyone who is not a white male should be required to support homosexuals. It makes no sense at all.

 

[Zysoclaplem]

Originally posted by: Rob9874

Originally posted by: Wheezer

Originally posted by: johnjohn320

Originally posted by: Carbo
Good for him. Nothing wrong with expressing an opinion. Is there? I find it amusing that the liberals whine about how intolerant the "unenlightened" are, yet don't tolerate an opinion that differs from their own.

Forget opinions. Homophobes ignore the science that has all but proven homosexuality is biological. Course, what could we expect? These are often the same people that ignore the science of global warming, or ignore the science of geology/carbon dating/friggin' dinosaurs...Maybe social conservatives are really just anti-science.

lol...wtf does science have to do with it?...nothing

Scientific fact: dogs are 4 legged, fury mammals.

Many people like dogs because they are friendly, obedient, devoted and playful. Dog owners often look upon their dogs as an extension of their families.

So what?

I hate dogs.

They are stupid, slobbery and smell bad when they get wet. I hate to clean up after them.

The scientific facts of what dogs are, and why they are dogs is irrelevant to the fact that I do not like them.

Just because something is scientifically true and accurate does not mean you have to accept it and like it.

Believe it or not you can understand the science of something and accept it as true facts and still not like it.

I like that illustration! I too hate dogs. I hope I'm not attacked by dog lovers.

It's strange how you're allowed to choose which animals you like and which you dislike, but you're required to like all humans. Why?

Because your opinion of dogs does not affect the outcome of the lives of other dogs.
Your opinion on homosexuals can potentially change their lives.
If you hate/dislike homosexuals, you are going to vote anti-homosexual politicians into office.
Those politicians are going to create laws that set boundaries for homosexuals.
And for what? Do they stink? No. Do they slobber? No. Are they stupid mindless beasts? No. They just happen to find their own sex more attractive than the opposite sex. Such a crime.

 

[Zysoclaplem]

Originally posted by: classy
I don't understand the "parallel" of being black and what that has to do with being gay? Its like people lay at the feet of every black person that because they are black they have to support gays. Its the dumbest argument I have ever seen in support of being a homosexual. I guess all jews, hispanics, women, midgets, fat people, ugly people, and we can throw in muslims now too, guess anyone who is not a white male should be required to support homosexuals. It makes no sense at all.

It's the myth that people who have been discriminated against are usually more sympathetic to others who face the same challenges in life. It's not true at all.

 

[slurmsmackenzie]

Originally posted by: UNESC0

Originally posted by: slurmsmackenzie

speak for yourself, fruit salad. i'll spend more time face down in a muff than i will jiggling an a$$ or titties with the in and out. nothing like a good beef curtain to nibble on before getting down to brass tacks. you're naive if you think a majority of men don't find the vagina attactive for it's pungant odor and unique look. but i agree in a sense, i'll tongue punch the brown star while i'm spreadin' the curtain.

that was the most romantic thing I've heard this month...

LOL thanks... like i told zyso... i'm trying my hardest to get it locked. i LOVE to argue with you guys. i argue with the missus less as a result... LOL, but we've argued this topic to death in one for(u)m or another. while i enjoy rehashing the same viewpoints over and over (and i find aidanjm to be a worthy debating advesary (the douglas to my lincoln), i'd just as soon see this and other topics like it die. then again, it's a major topic of discussion and causes a major rift in our society regardless of who is right. free speach undoubtedly ok and unfortunately we have to rely on the individual to use that right in a manor that's unoffensive.... right or wrong. with every major technological and social advance comes along with it the perversion of such. the imperfection of humanity dictates it (but that's for another highly debatable thread altogether.....)

 

[Zysoclaplem]

Originally posted by: slurmsmackenzie

Originally posted by: UNESC0

Originally posted by: slurmsmackenzie

speak for yourself, fruit salad. i'll spend more time face down in a muff than i will jiggling an a$$ or titties with the in and out. nothing like a good beef curtain to nibble on before getting down to brass tacks. you're naive if you think a majority of men don't find the vagina attactive for it's pungant odor and unique look. but i agree in a sense, i'll tongue punch the brown star while i'm spreadin' the curtain.

that was the most romantic thing I've heard this month...

LOL thanks... like i told zyso... i'm trying my hardest to get it locked. i LOVE to argue with you guys. i argue with the missus less as a result... LOL, but we've argued this topic to death in one for(u)m or another. while i enjoy rehashing the same viewpoints over and over (and i find aidanjm to be a worthy debating advesary (the douglas to my lincoln), i'd just as soon see this and other topics like it die. then again, it's a major topic of discussion and causes a major rift in our society regardless of who is right. free speach undoubtedly ok and unfortunately we have to rely on the individual to use that right in a manor that's unoffensive.... right or wrong. with every major technological and social advance comes along with it the perversion of such. the imperfection of humanity dictates it (but that's for another highly debatable thread altogether.....)

Yeah but you can do better than "fruit salad." But then again, you would be walking that fine line between lock and ban...lol.

 

[slurmsmackenzie]

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: Rob9874

Originally posted by: Wheezer

Originally posted by: johnjohn320

Originally posted by: Carbo
Good for him. Nothing wrong with expressing an opinion. Is there? I find it amusing that the liberals whine about how intolerant the "unenlightened" are, yet don't tolerate an opinion that differs from their own.

Forget opinions. Homophobes ignore the science that has all but proven homosexuality is biological. Course, what could we expect? These are often the same people that ignore the science of global warming, or ignore the science of geology/carbon dating/friggin' dinosaurs...Maybe social conservatives are really just anti-science.

lol...wtf does science have to do with it?...nothing

Scientific fact: dogs are 4 legged, fury mammals.

Many people like dogs because they are friendly, obedient, devoted and playful. Dog owners often look upon their dogs as an extension of their families.

So what?

I hate dogs.

They are stupid, slobbery and smell bad when they get wet. I hate to clean up after them.

The scientific facts of what dogs are, and why they are dogs is irrelevant to the fact that I do not like them.

Just because something is scientifically true and accurate does not mean you have to accept it and like it.

Believe it or not you can understand the science of something and accept it as true facts and still not like it.

I like that illustration! I too hate dogs. I hope I'm not attacked by dog lovers.

It's strange how you're allowed to choose which animals you like and which you dislike, but you're required to like all humans. Why?

Because your opinion of dogs does not affect the outcome of the lives of other dogs.
Your opinion on homosexuals can potentially change their lives.
If you hate/dislike homosexuals, you are going to vote anti-homosexual politicians into office.
Those politicians are going to create laws that set boundaries for homosexuals.
And for what? Do they stink? No. Do they slobber? No. Are they stupid mindless beasts? No. They just happen to find their own sex more attractive than the opposite sex. Such a crime.

sorry for going off topic? but i feel the same way about marijuana.... and where's the political love there? now excuse me, i have a baby sandwich getting cold in the microwave.

 

[Zysoclaplem]

Originally posted by: slurmsmackenzie

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: Rob9874

Originally posted by: Wheezer

Originally posted by: johnjohn320

Originally posted by: Carbo
Good for him. Nothing wrong with expressing an opinion. Is there? I find it amusing that the liberals whine about how intolerant the "unenlightened" are, yet don't tolerate an opinion that differs from their own.

Forget opinions. Homophobes ignore the science that has all but proven homosexuality is biological. Course, what could we expect? These are often the same people that ignore the science of global warming, or ignore the science of geology/carbon dating/friggin' dinosaurs...Maybe social conservatives are really just anti-science.

lol...wtf does science have to do with it?...nothing

Scientific fact: dogs are 4 legged, fury mammals.

Many people like dogs because they are friendly, obedient, devoted and playful. Dog owners often look upon their dogs as an extension of their families.

So what?

I hate dogs.

They are stupid, slobbery and smell bad when they get wet. I hate to clean up after them.

The scientific facts of what dogs are, and why they are dogs is irrelevant to the fact that I do not like them.

Just because something is scientifically true and accurate does not mean you have to accept it and like it.

Believe it or not you can understand the science of something and accept it as true facts and still not like it.

I like that illustration! I too hate dogs. I hope I'm not attacked by dog lovers.

It's strange how you're allowed to choose which animals you like and which you dislike, but you're required to like all humans. Why?

Because your opinion of dogs does not affect the outcome of the lives of other dogs.
Your opinion on homosexuals can potentially change their lives.
If you hate/dislike homosexuals, you are going to vote anti-homosexual politicians into office.
Those politicians are going to create laws that set boundaries for homosexuals.
And for what? Do they stink? No. Do they slobber? No. Are they stupid mindless beasts? No. They just happen to find their own sex more attractive than the opposite sex. Such a crime.

sorry for going off topic? but i feel the same way about marijuana.... and where's the political love there? now excuse me, i have a baby sandwich getting cold in the microwave.

Spark it up! I don't care who smokes pot.
I just enjoy my runner's lungs. People who smoke pot are kind of funny actually. Well, until they get annoying. No worse than booze.

 

[K1052]

Originally posted by: classy
I don't understand the "parallel" of being black and what that has to do with being gay? Its like people lay at the feet of every black person that because they are black they have to support gays. Its the dumbest argument I have ever seen in support of being a homosexual. I guess all jews, hispanics, women, midgets, fat people, ugly people, and we can throw in muslims now too, guess anyone who is not a white male should be required to support homosexuals. It makes no sense at all.

Because unlike everyone you mentioned, homosexuals still have to struggle for equality in the law due to a uncontrollable characteristic.

Some of the arguments used to justify prejudice against gays bear similarity to the ones that supported slavery and segregation: Bilologically flawed, the bible says so, bad influence on society, etc...

 

[slurmsmackenzie]

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: slurmsmackenzie

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: Rob9874

Originally posted by: Wheezer

Originally posted by: johnjohn320

Originally posted by: Carbo
Good for him. Nothing wrong with expressing an opinion. Is there? I find it amusing that the liberals whine about how intolerant the "unenlightened" are, yet don't tolerate an opinion that differs from their own.

Forget opinions. Homophobes ignore the science that has all but proven homosexuality is biological. Course, what could we expect? These are often the same people that ignore the science of global warming, or ignore the science of geology/carbon dating/friggin' dinosaurs...Maybe social conservatives are really just anti-science.

lol...wtf does science have to do with it?...nothing

Scientific fact: dogs are 4 legged, fury mammals.

Many people like dogs because they are friendly, obedient, devoted and playful. Dog owners often look upon their dogs as an extension of their families.

So what?

I hate dogs.

They are stupid, slobbery and smell bad when they get wet. I hate to clean up after them.

The scientific facts of what dogs are, and why they are dogs is irrelevant to the fact that I do not like them.

Just because something is scientifically true and accurate does not mean you have to accept it and like it.

Believe it or not you can understand the science of something and accept it as true facts and still not like it.

I like that illustration! I too hate dogs. I hope I'm not attacked by dog lovers.

It's strange how you're allowed to choose which animals you like and which you dislike, but you're required to like all humans. Why?

Because your opinion of dogs does not affect the outcome of the lives of other dogs.
Your opinion on homosexuals can potentially change their lives.
If you hate/dislike homosexuals, you are going to vote anti-homosexual politicians into office.
Those politicians are going to create laws that set boundaries for homosexuals.
And for what? Do they stink? No. Do they slobber? No. Are they stupid mindless beasts? No. They just happen to find their own sex more attractive than the opposite sex. Such a crime.

sorry for going off topic? but i feel the same way about marijuana.... and where's the political love there? now excuse me, i have a baby sandwich getting cold in the microwave.

Spark it up! I don't care who smokes pot.
I just enjoy my runner's lungs. People who smoke pot are kind of funny actually. Well, until they get annoying. No worse than booze.

i smoke regularly and run about a 6 minute mile...... that's all i'm gonna say. i hate to hijack, but i'm high man... and you know how out there us dopeheads are.

edit.... booze is way worse. tears apart families, kills innocent people which us at ATOT can definitely agree with. the only thing dope hurts is the guy smoking it.... and that's only cuz he'll go to jail if he's caught. i wish la guardia was still alive.

 

[Zysoclaplem]

Originally posted by: slurmsmackenzie



i smoke regularly and run about a 6 minute mile...... that's all i'm gonna say. i hate to hijack, but i'm high man... and you know how out there us dopeheads are.

That's pretty good. How many miles though? I know plenty of people who can run faster than me in a mile, but are dead after that mile...lol.

 

[armstrda]

its too bad, he was quite the baller

 

[slurmsmackenzie]

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: slurmsmackenzie



i smoke regularly and run about a 6 minute mile...... that's all i'm gonna say. i hate to hijack, but i'm high man... and you know how out there us dopeheads are.

That's pretty good. How many miles though? I know plenty of people who can run faster than me in a mile, but are dead after that mile...lol.

i'm not a runner by trade. i'm more of an up and down the court baller, but i could probably run 2 or 3 miles without having to slow to a walk, although my arm gets tired from hauling my bong all that way.

 

[Zysoclaplem]

Originally posted by: slurmsmackenzie

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: slurmsmackenzie



i smoke regularly and run about a 6 minute mile...... that's all i'm gonna say. i hate to hijack, but i'm high man... and you know how out there us dopeheads are.

That's pretty good. How many miles though? I know plenty of people who can run faster than me in a mile, but are dead after that mile...lol.

i'm not a runner by trade. i'm more of an up and down the court baller, but i could probably run 2 or 3 miles without having to slow to a walk, although my arm gets tired from hauling my bong all that way.

I'll have to time myself on one mile one day and get my best time. I don't really know if I can do a 6 minute but I know I can do a 7 and not be tired.

 

[Oceandevi]

Originally posted by: Zysoclaplem

Originally posted by: Rob9874

Originally posted by: Wheezer

Originally posted by: johnjohn320

Originally posted by: Carbo
Good for him. Nothing wrong with expressing an opinion. Is there? I find it amusing that the liberals whine about how intolerant the "unenlightened" are, yet don't tolerate an opinion that differs from their own.

Forget opinions. Homophobes ignore the science that has all but proven homosexuality is biological. Course, what could we expect? These are often the same people that ignore the science of global warming, or ignore the science of geology/carbon dating/friggin' dinosaurs...Maybe social conservatives are really just anti-science.

lol...wtf does science have to do with it?...nothing

Scientific fact: dogs are 4 legged, fury mammals.

Many people like dogs because they are friendly, obedient, devoted and playful. Dog owners often look upon their dogs as an extension of their families.

So what?

I hate dogs.

They are stupid, slobbery and smell bad when they get wet. I hate to clean up after them.

The scientific facts of what dogs are, and why they are dogs is irrelevant to the fact that I do not like them.

Just because something is scientifically true and accurate does not mean you have to accept it and like it.

Believe it or not you can understand the science of something and accept it as true facts and still not like it.

I like that illustration! I too hate dogs. I hope I'm not attacked by dog lovers.

It's strange how you're allowed to choose which animals you like and which you dislike, but you're required to like all humans. Why?

Because your opinion of dogs does not affect the outcome of the lives of other dogs.
Your opinion on homosexuals can potentially change their lives.
If you hate/dislike homosexuals, you are going to vote anti-homosexual politicians into office.
Those politicians are going to create laws that set boundaries for homosexuals.
And for what? Do they stink? No. Do they slobber? No. Are they stupid mindless beasts? No. They just happen to find their own sex more attractive than the opposite sex. Such a crime.

Sorry bud, when I vote... gays are the least of my concerns.
It is not that big of an issue compared to all our other problems.