i680 review thread.

Mango1970

Member
Aug 26, 2006
195
0
76
Dang I was just there... it's like magic. You beat me to it.

And damnit why do they insist on using an X6800 which so few of us have in regards to OC tests. Why not an e6300 or e6600... grr.
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
Originally posted by: Mango1970
Dang I was just there... it's like magic. You beat me to it.

And damnit why do they insist on using an X6800 which so few of us have in regards to OC tests. Why not an e6300 or e6600... grr.

exactly...

So very very few sites actually use CPUs that are not the top of the line $1k versions
 

de8212

Diamond Member
Jan 2, 2000
4,021
0
76
ANd I was curious if the Tuniq Tower would fit this board. The AT review confirms it will fit.

Now, does anyone think it would be crazy to get this board even though I don't plan on going SLI?? I mean, if I ever do it will be months and months before I can afford it. But if I don't buy a board that will officially support it then I can't do it even then.
So, is there a disadvantage (besides $) to running one video card on a SLI board?
 

Gary Key

Senior member
Sep 23, 2005
866
0
0
Originally posted by: Mango1970
Dang I was just there... it's like magic. You beat me to it.

And damnit why do they insist on using an X6800 which so few of us have in regards to OC tests. Why not an e6300 or e6600... grr.



We used an E6300 also in the preview article, 7x522. We will have E6600 and E6400 results in our 680i roundup in early December.
 

flexy

Diamond Member
Sep 28, 2001
8,464
155
106
so this board has still some issues and is NOT recommended if someone is NOT interested in a SLI setup ???

I am NOT interested in SLI, but i really need a good enthusiast/tweaker/overclocker board.

Or are those issues (mentioned in at least ONE review) just bios-related ? (Eg. doesnt OC that well etc..)


Edit: xbitlabs
>>>
If you are not interested in putting together an SLI system, then we wouldn?t recommend Nvidia nForce 680i SLI as a basis for your platform at this time. The thing is that the only mainboard available today is the reference mainboard and it didn?t prove the best in our performance, overclocking and power consumption tests. In other words, it couldn?t outperform the overclocker?s solutions in Intel 975X Express and Intel P965 Express chipsets in any of the practical tests, except the formal specifications, though.
>>>
 

clevere1

Senior member
May 11, 2003
629
0
76
Originally posted by: flexy
so this board has still some issues and is NOT recommended if someone is NOT interested in a SLI setup ???

I am NOT interested in SLI, but i really need a good enthusiast/tweaker/overclocker board.

Or are those issues (mentioned in at least ONE review) just bios-related ? (Eg. doesnt OC that well etc..)


Edit: xbitlabs
>>>
If you are not interested in putting together an SLI system, then we wouldn?t recommend Nvidia nForce 680i SLI as a basis for your platform at this time. The thing is that the only mainboard available today is the reference mainboard and it didn?t prove the best in our performance, overclocking and power consumption tests. In other words, it couldn?t outperform the overclocker?s solutions in Intel 975X Express and Intel P965 Express chipsets in any of the practical tests, except the formal specifications, though.
>>>


That's actually what the board is meant for, those who want to over clock the hell out of thier computers. That is the first, somewhat bad review I've seen. I already ordered the EVGA board ... This is from the tech report
Conclusions
Nvidia's nForce 680i SLI is more than just a chipset refresh with a new north bridge; it also includes a retail motherboard design, production-quality BIOS, and polished tweaking software. Combining those elements with core logic that's already loaded with integrated peripherals yields an incredibly potent platform for PC enthusiasts. More importantly, though, producing this reference design for its partners ensures that Nvidia's vision of an enthusiast-oriented motherboard makes it to market with as little meddling as possible.

Of course, not all of Nvidia's partners will be using its reference design as-is. Abit, Asus, DFI, Gigabyte, and MSI will be coming out with their own boards, and that should ensure plenty of diversity in the market. Matching the reference board's layout and BIOS will be a tall order, though. There's also no telling how long it will take original designs to reach shelves. EVGA's 122-CK-NF68 will be available starting today, and Nvidia expects it to sell for around the same price as boards based on Intel's 975X Express chipset.

If you're looking for a high-end motherboard for an SLI setup or extreme overclocking, the 122-CK-NF68 is one of the best boards around. It's not perfect, of course?we'd like to see lower power consumption, an onboard audio solution with proper EAX support, a better retention mechanism for the optional chipset fan, and everything necessary for eSATA connectivity in the box?but it comes awfully close.

A lot of what makes the 122-CK-NF68 such an appealing board is directly tied to the nForce 680i SLI chipset. Nvidia has taken a proven south bridge chip packed with dual hardware-accelerated Gigabit Ethernet controllers, six Serial ATA RAID ports, and more than enough PCI Express connectivity, and added a new north bridge with plenty of overclocking potential and a redesigned memory controller that's very fast indeed. That's a great core logic foundation for any enthusiast-oriented motherboard.

In the end, Nvidia has effectively launched two flavors of the nForce 680i SLI. The first is a complete reference platform that's perfect for picky enthusiasts and serious overclockers, while the second is a capable chipset due to be implemented in original designs from leading motherboard makers. Choice is a very good thing.

 

Gary Key

Senior member
Sep 23, 2005
866
0
0
Originally posted by: flexy
so this board has still some issues and is NOT recommended if someone is NOT interested in a SLI setup ???

I am NOT interested in SLI, but i really need a good enthusiast/tweaker/overclocker board.

Or are those issues (mentioned in at least ONE review) just bios-related ? (Eg. doesnt OC that well etc..)


Edit: xbitlabs
>>>
If you are not interested in putting together an SLI system, then we wouldn?t recommend Nvidia nForce 680i SLI as a basis for your platform at this time. The thing is that the only mainboard available today is the reference mainboard and it didn?t prove the best in our performance, overclocking and power consumption tests. In other words, it couldn?t outperform the overclocker?s solutions in Intel 975X Express and Intel P965 Express chipsets in any of the practical tests, except the formal specifications, though.
>>>



We were hitting 505FSB with the original P10 BIOS and E6300, have no idea why XBit had issues even though the BIOS they tested with is down two revisions. The one issue we ran into was with our E6600 samples, they would not go above 449FSB at any multiplier. We have a new BIOS coming today that might address this issue. Overall, the board clocks the Conroes higher than 965/975 and is almost equal to the 965 with the Allendales and the memory performance is slightly better than 965. The biggest advantage is that you can run the memory async or sync on this chipset.
 

Centurin

Member
Sep 13, 2006
155
0
71
Hey Gary, I don't want to sound like a broken record, but do you have any info on the new DFI 680i board?
 

Gary Key

Senior member
Sep 23, 2005
866
0
0
Originally posted by: Centurin
Hey Gary, I don't want to sound like a broken record, but do you have any info on the new DFI 680i board?


December time frame at this time although that could slip a little. I will get to see an engineering sample at DFI next week. Abit is saying January for their board but they are trying to move it in currently. It appears MSI, Gigabyte, and Asus all will be in December at this time although we do not have firm schedules yet.
 

BoboKatt

Senior member
Nov 18, 2004
529
0
0
This is great Gary! Thanks for the undate on the BIOS and max FSB. Yah on a good note though heck an e6600 at 400FSB at 9X is a dream in itself so thus far I am happy about this. If they do anything with the new bioses that acutally makes the 4meg cores go even higher, it's just icing on the cake!
 

Centurin

Member
Sep 13, 2006
155
0
71
Will it really be worth waiting for the DFI 680i? The MB is the last part I need for my new system and the Asus Striker is looking mighty sexy (although greatly overpriced atm). Will the feature set be any different? I'm interested to know how much they plan to devite from Nvidia's reference design.
 

mnemonik23

Member
Jan 12, 2005
49
0
0
Originally posted by: Gary Key
Originally posted by: flexy
so this board has still some issues and is NOT recommended if someone is NOT interested in a SLI setup ???

I am NOT interested in SLI, but i really need a good enthusiast/tweaker/overclocker board.

Or are those issues (mentioned in at least ONE review) just bios-related ? (Eg. doesnt OC that well etc..)


Edit: xbitlabs
>>>
If you are not interested in putting together an SLI system, then we wouldn?t recommend Nvidia nForce 680i SLI as a basis for your platform at this time. The thing is that the only mainboard available today is the reference mainboard and it didn?t prove the best in our performance, overclocking and power consumption tests. In other words, it couldn?t outperform the overclocker?s solutions in Intel 975X Express and Intel P965 Express chipsets in any of the practical tests, except the formal specifications, though.
>>>



We were hitting 505FSB with the original P10 BIOS and E6300, have no idea why XBit had issues even though the BIOS they tested with is down two revisions. The one issue we ran into was with our E6600 samples, they would not go above 449FSB at any multiplier. We have a new BIOS coming today that might address this issue. Overall, the board clocks the Conroes higher than 965/975 and is almost equal to the 965 with the Allendales and the memory performance is slightly better than 965. The biggest advantage is that you can run the memory async or sync on this chipset.

Hi Gary,
Is there any chance to get the latest BIOS from you or maybe from some other place?
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |