Not unusual, really. If I'm making the correct assumptions, a buff out file will be smaller if packet size is set at 2^33, than it would be at 2^28? Is it a LOT smaller?
Reason I ask is that I've been playing with settings on a few machines and 500 WU's, when set at 2^28, sucks up about 60K of space, but 500 WU's at 2^33 only takes 2K? Can there be THAT much difference?
If so, than I'm definitely not using 2^28 anymore. Is there any reason NOT to use 2^33?
Russ, NCNE
Reason I ask is that I've been playing with settings on a few machines and 500 WU's, when set at 2^28, sucks up about 60K of space, but 500 WU's at 2^33 only takes 2K? Can there be THAT much difference?
If so, than I'm definitely not using 2^28 anymore. Is there any reason NOT to use 2^33?
Russ, NCNE