Indian parliment attacked by terrorists!!!!!!!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Aelus

Golden Member
Oct 1, 2000
1,159
0
0
Unless i'm highly mistaking, kashmir wasn't exactly determined to go to india or pakistan, the UN decided it would be best if the people could make that choice.

oh well, who cares about democracy when we can have dictatorship.

Aelus
 

Shantanu

Banned
Feb 6, 2001
2,197
1
0


<< Unless i'm highly mistaking, kashmir wasn't exactly determined to go to india or pakistan, the UN decided it would be best if the people could make that choice. >>



LMFAO. Your claims are absolutely ridiculous. What right would the UN have to meddle in a nation's internal affairs? When India gained independence from the UK, it was one country, if only for a brief period. A deal was hammered out to allow the Muslim majority regions of East and West Pakistan to secede from India and become their own states. This deal had been made years before. Ghandi, Nehru, etc. made this deal with the Muslim leaders at the time in exchange for their support against the British. Kashmir was not part of the deal. The dispute with Kashmir occured after the partition. The UN offered as a solution, for a referendum in Kashmir. Of course, it was no skin off their @ss. They offered the same solution for Israel, that some 50-60% of the territory be carved up and given to a new state of Palestine. The UN had no jurisdiction, and the UN is not law. The UN exists to promote relations between nations, not to interfere with the internal affairs of nations.

Once again I bring up the example of South Carolina in the 1860's. If countries allowed portions to secede everytime they disagreed with the state, there wouldn't be much of the state left. Countries have a right to stop secessions.



<< oh well, who cares about democracy when we can have dictatorship. >>



LMFAO. And this coming from a Pakistani supporter. It's like Hitler crying about the KKK's racism.
 

thereds

Diamond Member
Apr 4, 2000
7,886
0
0


<< <<pakistan is islamic country, >>


no....pakistan is not an islamic country. its laws are not islamic laws. muslims happen to live in pakistan. on the government level it is all politics, not islam.
>>



Err did you know that its called the Islamic Republic of Pakistan?

Didn't think so.
 

thereds

Diamond Member
Apr 4, 2000
7,886
0
0


<< Unless i'm highly mistaking, kashmir wasn't exactly determined to go to india or pakistan, the UN decided it would be best if the people could make that choice.

oh well, who cares about democracy when we can have dictatorship.

Aelus
>>



You know, if you really don't know anything about the region, the history etc., you really shouldn't voice your opinion.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
I think that the ruler of Kashmir back then decided to join India even though most of his citizens were Muslim. I believe that the ruler was a Hindu.

The UN referendum thing can't really be used anymore because supposedly Pakistan sent in millions of tribesmen or something like that into Kashmir. The UN referendum asks that the original population of Kashmir be reinstated. That would require the removal of those people. I think there are some more provisions that must happen before the UN wanted the referendum. It's on the UN website somewhere if you want to read it

Here's a similar situation. Let's say millions and millions of Mexicans illegally moved to Texas and settled there. Then the UN wants a vote on whether Texas should belong to the US or Mexico. Would the US go along with a vote?
 

Aelus

Golden Member
Oct 1, 2000
1,159
0
0
Shantanu, ofcourse the UN has no jurisdiction, but sometimes they can provide good outsider advice. Anyway, do you have a better idea on how to solve the problem other than genocide or a referendum.

A referendum was held at east timor too, and something similar (parliamentory elections, which will probably lead to further steps) happened at kosovo. Why does the international community care about those places, and not about kashmir? aren't 30000 deaths enough in the past 10 years?

btw canoworms, did those immigrants go to the indian side, or to the pakistani side? if it's to the pakestani side, i really don't see it affecting a referendums outcome, which imho, should be held on both sides, with separate results.

Aelus - out till tomorrow.
 

Shantanu

Banned
Feb 6, 2001
2,197
1
0


<< I think that the ruler of Kashmir back then decided to join India even though most of his citizens were Muslim. I believe that the ruler was a Hindu.

The UN referendum thing can't really be used anymore because supposedly Pakistan sent in millions of tribesmen or something like that into Kashmir. The UN referendum asks that the original population of Kashmir be reinstated. That would require the removal of those people. I think there are some more provisions that must happen before the UN wanted the referendum. It's on the UN website somewhere if you want to read it

Here's a similar situation. Let's say millions and millions of Mexicans illegally moved to Texas and settled there. Then the UN wants a vote on whether Texas should belong to the US or Mexico. Would the US go along with a vote?
>>



Damn right. An excellent and cleverly illustrated analogy.
 

Infos

Diamond Member
Jul 20, 2001
4,001
1
0
How about this for a synopsis of Pakistan

Pakistan is the home of many wacked-out muslims and they are churning our
many more every day with their religious schools
(all of these fruitcakes are dedicated to overthrowing the existing govt.
anyway they can and establishing an islam state)

:disgust:
 

Ameesh

Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
23,686
1
0


<< How about this for a synopsis of Pakistan

Pakistan is the home of many wacked-out muslims and they are churning our
many more every day with their religious schools
(all of these fruitcakes are dedicated to overthrowing the existing govt.
anyway they can and establishing an islam state)

:disgust:
>>



and the bastards cheat at cricket!
 

Aelus

Golden Member
Oct 1, 2000
1,159
0
0
I think the situation is also similar to china and taiwan, if china would take over taiwan, i think you'd get a pretty similar situation to kashmir. Both are domestical problems, and it's twice the inhabitants of a province who don't want to live under the main government.

A state should serve the people, not the other way around. So if the population of a region decides they want independance, why not?

As for your USA analogy, i doubt pakistanis moved to the part occupied by india, so a referendum would still be very accurate.

Aelus
 

xyyz

Diamond Member
Sep 3, 2000
4,331
0
0
hmmm... it seems like this place is littered with Indians or pro-India supporters... not one Pakistani supporter has emerged...

well, I guess that leaves me to sort some of this out... India is no better than Pakistan, it's not the bastion of democracy they like to project, it's just as corrupt and the government just as inept as the Pakistani government... although, with Musharaf, there seems to be some hope for Pakistan.

Here's a history lesson for some of you moronic Indians that state Kashmir is part of India. And please, don't argue with me unless you have something of substance that I can verify... meaning that anti-pakistani rhetoric that your daddy and uncles spew doesn't cut it.

The following excerpts are from Stanley Wolpert's "A New History of India" - Fourth Edition.

Kashmir, Hyderabad and Junagadh were three states under rule of a monarch. Kashmir was overwhelmingly Muslim, but had a Hindu ruler while Hyderabad and Junagadh where primarily Hindu with a Muslim ruler.

"Though the nawab of Junagadh and the nizam of Hyderabad were Muslim, the overwhelming majority of their subjects were Hindus, and it seemed only proper, therefore in the spirit of democracy, to consider the preferenced of the people rather than despotic desires of their monacrchs in deciding to which dominion these states would accede. Geographic position was also a most important determinant, at least in the ase of Hyderabad, which was totally surrounded by India. The Nizam's reluctance to acced was thes viewed as litle more than an autocratic while, and India accepted a one-yer standstill afreement from Hyderabad, giving the Nizan until August 1948 to made up his mind. On septemberr 13, 1948, India troops invaded the state in what Dehli called a "police action," cide-named Operation Polo. Two divisions of the Indian Army's Southern Command crushed Hyderabad resistance in four days. Junagadh was much smaller than Hyderabad, yet its case was similar, though being on the coast of the Kathiawar peninsula some three hundered miles by sea from Karachi, its nawab claimed that he had every right to accede to Pakistan, whch he did on August 15, 1947. The government of India feared that the accession would have "undesirable efects on law and order in the Kathiawar as a whole" and hence imposed an economic blockage and subsequently armed a "liberation army" of Hindu emigrees to take acontrol of the state." (pg.352)

Well, well, look at that... India did exactly what it allegest Pakistan is doing right now in Kashmir. I don't think I need to say much more about India's hypocricy, Wolpert has said it with so much eloquence.

But wait... there's more:

"Kashmir posed a different sort of problem, since three-fourths of its four million people were Muslim, but it's maharaja, Hari Singh, was a Hindu Dogra Rajput. With some eighty-five thousand square miles of beautiful and highly strategic real estate dangling over North India as well as West Pakistan, the state of Jammu and Kashmir was a most tempting plum for both dominions, so tempding, in fact, that it would lure them to war more than once over its sprakiling Himalayan vale. The Dogra Rajput cal of Jammu rule Kashmir through their able Kashmiri brahman civil servants, the Pandits, whole most famous family was the Nehru-Kaul clan.... As the countdown on Britian's transfer of power neared its conclusion, Hari Singh, signed a standstill agreement with Pakistan, unable to bring himself to accede to either dominion and hoping that his mountainous state might be permitted to remain independant, a Switzerland of Asia. The communal complexion of most his population, as well as the all-weather road link to Pakistan and the fact that Kashmir controlled the headwaters of the Indus and other Punjab rivers, certaily seemed good reasons to predispose Kashmir toward accesion to Pakistan, but Hari Singh no doubt feared that his prospects of retaining power might be much weaker in a Muslim dominion than with India. While he temporized during late August and early September, the province of Poonch, in the south-wet corner of Kashmir, flared in revolt, Muslim peasents rising against the oppression of Dogra Rajput landowners. The Poonch revolt was supported by nieghboring Paksitani Muslims, who crossed the borders of the state in numbers to aid co-religionists in their agrarain struggle for freedom. Hari Singh viewed the revolt as a Pakistani plot to depose him. The maharaja turned to New Dekhi for support and released Shigkh Abdulla from jail to fly there for talks with Nehru, who has supported his nationa Conference durrings it's previous decacde of struggle. On OCtober 21, 1947, the sheikh informed Delhi's press that the Kashmiris wwanted "freedom beforre accession." Pakistan's British army lorries were, however, already packed with thousands of Pathans, armed to the teeth, barreling east over the IUndus at Attock, where Alexanderr had crossed with his army, down the Jhelum river valley to the undefended Baramula Road, the highway to Sirinagar.

On October 26, Hari Singh formally acceded to India and appealed for military support to defend Srinagar. Mountbatton insisted, in view of the prediminantly Muslim population of Kashmir, that India's acceptance "to be conditional on the will of the people being ascertained by a plebiscite after the raiders had been driven out of the State" and order was restored. Nehru an dhis cabinet agreed. The airlift of the first Sikh Battalion from Dehli to Srinagar was launched the following morning; the Vale's capital was saved and the tribal forces turned west witin a few days. Jinnah tried to hurl Pakistan's Army into a battle at this time, but his British commander-in-chief, General Gracey, explained that he coud not order his troops into compat against a siste dominon's forces without prior approval from his supreme commander, Field Marshal Auchinleck. Auchinleck flew to Lahore on October 28 to inform Govenor-General Jinnah that if he insisted upon sending Pakistn's Regular Army into Kashmir, which had "legall acceded" to India, it would "automaticallyy and immediately" require the withdrawal of every British officer serving with the Pakistan Army.

The fighting in Kashmir raged on until the state's defacto partition was effected on a line of battle stablized just east of Uri and Poonch. The number of tribal raiders was about thirty thousand before the year's end, and these men became the regular army of the government of Azad ("Free") Kashmir, which held less than a quarter of the western portion of the state, exclluding the Vale. Azad Kashmir, with its capital at Muzaffarabad, susequently acceded to Paksitan. No plebiscite was ever help in Kashmir as a whole. Nehru insisted as a prerequisite to a plecibite that Paksitan "vacate its aggression" by withdrawing all "invaders" from Kashmir, and Jinnah proposed simultanous withdrawal of the "forces of Indian Dominino and the tribesmen." Sheikh Abdullah was flown back to Srinagar as premier. The cease-fire arranged by the United Nations would not come into effect in Kashmir until January 1, 1949."


Now a little reference to the UN...

Resolution 47 calling for a Plebiscte in Kashmir.
"Noting with satisfaction that both India and Pakistan desire that the question of the accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India or Pakistan should be decided through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite"

RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION FOR INDIA AND PAKISTAN ON 13 AUGUST 1948.
"PART III
The Government of India and the Government of Pakistan reaffirm their wish that the future status of the State of Jammu and Kashmir shall be determined in accordance with the will of the people and to that end, upon acceptance of the Truce Agreement both Governments agree to enter into consultations with the Commission to determine fair and equitable conditions whereby such free expression will be assured."

Resolution 80 (1950)
"Commending the Governments of India and Pakistan for their statesman like action in reaching the
agreements embodied in the United Nations Commission's resolutions of August 13, 1948 and
January 5, 1949 for a cease-fire, for the demilitarisation of the State of Jammu and Kashmir and for
the determination of its final disposition in accordance with the will of the people through the
democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite, and commending the parties in particular for
their action in partially implementing these Resolutions by

(1) The cessation of hostilities effected January 1, 1949,

(2) The establishment of a cease-fire line on July 27, 1949, and

(3) The agreement that Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz shall be Plebiscite Administrator,

Considering that the resolution of the outstanding difficulties should be based upon the substantial
measure of agreement of fundamental principles already reached, and that steps should be taken
forthwith for the demilitarisation of the State and for the expeditious determination of its future in
accordance with the freely expressed will of the inhabitants,

1. Calls upon the Governments of India and Pakistan to make immediate arrangements, without
prejudice to their rights or claims and with due regard to the requirements of law and order, to
prepare and execute within a period of five months from the date of this resolution a programme of
demilitarisation on the basis of the principles of paragraph 2 of General McNaughton proposal or of
such modifications of those principles as may be mutually agreed;

2. Decides to appoint a United Nations Representative for the following purposes who shall have
authority to perform his functions in such place or places as he may deem appropriate;

(a) to assist in the preparation and to supervise the implementation of the programme of
demilitarisation referred to above and' to interpret the agreements reached by the parties for
demilitarisation;

(b) to place himself at the disposal of the Governments of India and Pakistan and to place
before those Governments or the Security Council any suggestions which, in his opinion, are
likely to contribute to the expeditious and enduring solution of the dispute which has arisen
between the two Governments in regard to the State of Jammu and Kashmir; to exercise all of
the powers and responsibilities devolving upon the United Nations Commission for India and
Pakistan by reason of existing resolutions of the Security Council and by reason of the
agreement of the parties embodied in the Resolutions of the United Nations Commission of
August 13, 1948 and January 5, 1949; to arrange at the appropriate stage of demilitarisation
for the assumption by the Plebiscite Administrator of the functions assigned to the latter under
agreements made between the parties; to report to the Security Council as he may consider
necessary, submitting his conclusions and any recommendations which he may desire to
make; "




"*RESOLUTION ADOPTED AT THE MEETING OF THE UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION FOR INDIA AND PAKISTAN ON 5 JANUARY, 1949. (DOCUMENT NO. S/1196, PARA IS, DATED THE 10TH JANUARY, 1949)


THE UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION FOR INDIA AND PAKISTAN,


Having received from the Governments of India and Pakistan in Communications, dated December 23 and December 25, 1948, respectively their acceptance of the following principles which are supplementary to the Commission's Resolution of August 13, 1948;



The question of the accession of the State of Jammu and Kashmir to India or Pakistan will be decided through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite;


A plebiscite will be held when it shall be found by the Commission that the cease-fire and truce arrangements set forth in Parts I and II of the Commission's resolution of 13 August 1948, have been carried out and arrangements for the plebiscite have been completed;



The Secretary-General of the United Nations will, in agreement with the Commission, nominate a Plebiscite Administrator who shall be a personality of high international standing and commanding general confidence. He will be formally appointed to office by the Government of Jammu and Kashmir.


The Plebiscite Administrator shall derive from the State of Jammu and Kashmir the powers he considers necessary for organizing and conducting the plebiscite and for ensuring the freedom and impartiality of the plebiscite.


The Plebiscite Administrator shall have authority to appoint such staff or assistants and observers as he may require.



After implementation of Parts I and II of the Commission's resolution of 13 August 1948, and when the Commission is satisfied that peaceful conditions have been restored in the State, the Commission and the Plebiscite Administrator will determine, in consultation with the Government of India, the final disposal of Indian and State armed forces, such disposal to be with due regard to the security of the State and the freedom of the plebiscite.


As regards the territory referred to in A 2 of Part II of the resolution of 13 August, final disposal of the armed forces in that territory will be determined by the Commission and the Plebiscite Administrator in consultation with the local authorities.


All civil and military authorities within the State and the principal political elements of the State will be required to co-operate with the Plebiscite Administrator in the preparation for and the holding of the plebiscite.



All citizens of the State who have left it on account of the disturbances will be invited and be free to return and to exercise all their rights as such citizens. For the purpose of facilitating repatriation there shall be appointed two Commissions, one composed of nominees of India and the other of nominees of Pakistan.

The Commissions shall operate under the direction of the Plebiscite Administrator. The Governments of India and Pakistan and all authorities within the State of Jammu and Kashmir will collaborate with the Plebiscite Administrator in putting this provision to effect.



All persons (other than citizens of the State) who on or since 15 August 1947, have entered it for other than lawful purpose, shall be required to leave the State.


All authorities within the State of Jammu and Kashmir will undertake to ensure in collaboration with the Plebiscite Administrator that:


There is no threat, coercion or intimidation, bribery other undue influence on the voters in plebiscite;


No restrictions are placed on legitimate political activity throughout the State. All subjects of the State, regardless of creed, caste or party, shall be safe and free in expressing their views and in voting on the question of the accession of the State to India or Pakistan. There shall be freedom of the Press, speech and assembly and freedom of travel in the State, including freedom of lawful entry and exit;


All political prisoners are released;


Minorities in all parts of the State are accorded adequate protection; and


There is no victimization.


The Plebiscite Administrator may refer to the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan problems on which he may require assistance, and the Commission may in its discretion call upon the Plebiscite Administrator to carry out on its behalf any of the responsibilities with which it has been entrusted;


At the conclusion of the plebiscite, the Plebiscite Administrator shall report the result thereof to the Commission and to the Government of Jammu and Kashmir. The Commission shall then certify to the Security Council whether the Plebiscite has or has not been free and impartial;


Upon the signature of the truce agreement the details of the foregoing proposals will be elaborated in the consultation envisaged in Part III of the Commission's resolution of 13 August 1948. The Plebiscite Administrator will be fully associated in these consultations;

Commends the Governments of India and Pakistan for their prompt action in ordering a cease-fire to take effect from one minute before midnight of first January 1949, pursuant to the agreement arrived at as provided for by the Commission's resolution of 13 August 1948; and


Resolves to return in the immediate future to the sub-continent to discharge the responsibilities imposed upon it by the resolution of 13 August 1948, and by the foregoing principles.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* UNCIP unanimously adopted this Resolution on 5-1-1949.


Members of the Commission: Argentina, Belgium, Columbia, Czechoslovakia and U.S.A.
 

xyyz

Diamond Member
Sep 3, 2000
4,331
0
0


<< Muslim = a follower of the teaching of Islam. Pakistan is an islamic country. When beloved patriot and India seperated, a majority of the Islamic population went to beloved patriot, the Hindu population remained in India >>



Well that was the theory... but in reality there are more Muslims in India than in Paksitan.
 

xyyz

Diamond Member
Sep 3, 2000
4,331
0
0

If you guys think that the Middle East conflict will get people pissed... you don't know what the Kashmir conflict does to desis. It'll get random strangers beating the hell outta' each other. Which will probably happen in abudance this weekend durring the Eid Melas.



<<

<< no....pakistan is not an islamic country. its laws are not islamic laws. muslims happen to live in pakistan. on the government level it is all politics, not islam. >>



Is that why their flag is green with a crescent on it (Crescent = Islamic symbolic equivalent of cross)? Pakistan, unlike India, is *not* a secular country. Pakistan was founded on the basis of religion. The first act Pakistan ever took was to declare itself a Muslim state. Now, there's nothing necessarily wrong with having an official state religion. Most European countries have state religions. But in Pakistan, freedom of religion does not exist, as it forbidden in Islam. Religious minorities, those that were not slaughtered or driven out after the 1940's partition, are routinely persecuted there. There was an incident hardly a month ago in which an entire congregation of Pakistani Christians were slaughtered by a gang of Muslims while they were at church. At the government level, Pakistan is 100% Islamic. How many Hindus, Christians, or Sikhs are members of Pakistani Parliament? Oh woops, I forgot, there's a millitary dictatorship there now. The government of Pakistan has always been run by Islamic fundamentalists that are hell bent on wresting Kashmir from India, so as to distract their people from their real problems.
>>



This is pointless, this has been happening in the region for a long time. Did you forget about the massive murder, rape and pilliage durring the partition? What about the destruction of the Babarhi Mosque? Pakistanis are not exclusive in this. It's a stupid desi trait. At least pakistan doesn't deal in sex slavery.



<< There was a good read on this at the National Review today. >>



Oh yeah, there's a super credible peridocial. This is about as right wing as the falwell clan.



<< Pakistan by itself is not a religious country. >>



Are you insane? Pakistan created the Taliban. Pakistan is involved in every Islamic terrorist jihad from Chechnya to Kashmir to Israel. Pakistan is home to the fundamentalist religious schools that trained and indoctrinated most of the Taliban. Maybe they don't have a law on the books mandating women to wear veils in public, but I'd like to see a woman walk through a Pakistani street wearing western clothes without getting stoned to death.[/i] >>



Madrases are a danger... and Musharaf has done alot to shut many of them down. As for your claim that Pakistan is involved in every Islamic Jihad... please provide proof where the government of Pakistan, supported any terrorist act... and please don't bore me with the mention of Kashmir.

I have many female relatives in Paksitan... they all walk around in western attire. None of them have been stoned to death... so please shut the facial ass when you dunno' what the hell it is you're talking about.
 

Aelus

Golden Member
Oct 1, 2000
1,159
0
0
i reflected a bit about the mexicans in texas analogy, and i came across some interesting things i'll share.

1) mexicans emigrated to texas/USA for money, why would they want texas to leave the USA, so they can side with the much poorer mexico, it wouldn't make sense.

2) if you think that immigrants shouldn't be allowed to decide upon the fate of a country, i'm sure the american natives will be the deciding factor in the next elections.

Aelus

 

lawaris

Banned
Jun 26, 2001
3,690
1
0
HHHMMM.................I AM GONNA ANSWER EVERY STUPID THING U HAVE RAISED A QUESTION ABOUT !!!!
AND THEN ....please shut up !!!


  • hmmm... it seems like this place is littered with Indians or pro-India supporters... not one Pakistani supporter has emerged...

    well, I guess that leaves me to sort some of this out... India is no better than Pakistan, it's not the bastion of democracy they like to project, it's just as corrupt and the government just as inept as the Pakistani government... although, with Musharaf, there seems to be some hope for Pakistan.

    U r wrong there......INDIA is a democracy whereas Pakistan is NOT !!! It's various things depending on who is ruling. Right now it's ruled by the military.....so that makes it a MILITARY JUNTA'


    Here's a history lesson for some of you moronic Indians that state Kashmir is part of India. And please, don't argue with me unless you have something of substance that I can verify... meaning that anti-pakistani rhetoric that your daddy and uncles spew doesn't cut it.

    KASHMIR HAS BEEN AND ALWAYS WILL BE a part of India.
    I can cite hard facts of history to you....but to cut it short. During partition India was divided into 3 parts - India,Kashmir and (Pakistan + Bangladesh).Due to the barbaric treatment of it's populace Bangladesh be'cam independent and India has always been blamed by Pakis for that.They always sort of tend to be blind to the # of rapes , murders and atrocities committed on Bangladesh.
    Kashmir tried to stay Independent till Pakistan tried to send it regular army dressed as tribals to take over Kashmir.And Kashmir did fight for a while but then knowing that it would lose - it asked India for help and in return agreed to be a special state of India.
    Pakistan's only claim to Kashmir is that it is a muslim majority state.Which I think is a joke !!
    We have more muslims in India than pakistan has.....and some of them are even patriotic !!!!!!

    The following excerpts are from Stanley Wolpert's "A New History of India" - Fourth Edition.

    Who the FU*K is he ??? What authority does he have to write on India or for that matter Pakistan !!!
    Can he ever feel the pangs of partition .....if not ....he is living in a dream.The roots of the problems existing today were sown then and in the birth of Pakistan as an Islamic Republic. It was a country meant only for muslims and most of us were glad to see the riff-raff go !!!

    Kashmir, Hyderabad and Junagadh were three states under rule of a monarch. Kashmir was overwhelmingly Muslim, but had a Hindu ruler while Hyderabad and Junagadh where primarily Hindu with a Muslim ruler.

    "Though the nawab of Junagadh and the nizam of Hyderabad were Muslim, the overwhelming majority of their subjects were Hindus, and it seemed only proper, therefore in the spirit of democracy, to consider the preferenced of the people rather than despotic desires of their monacrchs in deciding to which dominion these states would accede. Geographic position was also a most important determinant, at least in the ase of Hyderabad, which was totally surrounded by India. The Nizam's reluctance to acced was thes viewed as litle more than an autocratic while, and India accepted a one-yer standstill afreement from Hyderabad, giving the Nizan until August 1948 to made up his mind. On septemberr 13, 1948, India troops invaded the state in what Dehli called a "police action," cide-named Operation Polo. Two divisions of the Indian Army's Southern Command crushed Hyderabad resistance in four days. Junagadh was much smaller than Hyderabad, yet its case was similar, though being on the coast of the Kathiawar peninsula some three hundered miles by sea from Karachi, its nawab claimed that he had every right to accede to Pakistan, whch he did on August 15, 1947. The government of India feared that the accession would have "undesirable efects on law and order in the Kathiawar as a whole" and hence imposed an economic blockage and subsequently armed a "liberation army" of Hindu emigrees to take acontrol of the state." (pg.352)

    Well, well, look at that... India did exactly what it allegest Pakistan is doing right now in Kashmir. I don't think I need to say much more about India's hypocricy, Wolpert has said it with so much eloquence.

    Well, I will concede you that - you do have done some homework on this !!!
    But the facts are slightly different. You are basically right on Hyderabad......but what you fail to mention that it was a very small region right in the middle of India.
    With one Pakistan on our border ....our leaders then could anticipate the problems of the future.....they certainly did not want to create 1 more right in the middle of India.
    I want you to think how that little place would have fared ???
    Wouldn't it have gone the way Bangladesh did !!!???
    So many others would have to suffer ....like the Bangladeshis did.

    AND - Pakistan was a grave mistake , a concession made by Gandhi etc. - maybe he was wise beyond our understanding.....for even if Pakistan agreed to join us today - as some of their leaders like Nawaz Sharif are fond of saying.....the citizens of India will never agree.
    We don't want them, nor their land and actually we don't want to have to do anything with them !!!!
    It's our misfortune that we share a border and a sad history with them.

    But wait... there's more:

    "Kashmir posed a different sort of problem, since three-fourths of its four million people were Muslim, but it's maharaja, Hari Singh, was a Hindu Dogra Rajput. With some eighty-five thousand square miles of beautiful and highly strategic real estate dangling over North India as well as West Pakistan, the state of Jammu and Kashmir was a most tempting plum for both dominions, so tempding, in fact, that it would lure them to war more than once over its sprakiling Himalayan vale. The Dogra Rajput cal of Jammu rule Kashmir through their able Kashmiri brahman civil servants, the Pandits, whole most famous family was the Nehru-Kaul clan.... As the countdown on Britian's transfer of power neared its conclusion, Hari Singh, signed a standstill agreement with Pakistan, unable to bring himself to accede to either dominion and hoping that his mountainous state might be permitted to remain independant, a Switzerland of Asia. The communal complexion of most his population, as well as the all-weather road link to Pakistan and the fact that Kashmir controlled the headwaters of the Indus and other Punjab rivers, certaily seemed good reasons to predispose Kashmir toward accesion to Pakistan, but Hari Singh no doubt feared that his prospects of retaining power might be much weaker in a Muslim dominion than with India. While he temporized during late August and early September, the province of Poonch, in the south-wet corner of Kashmir, flared in revolt, Muslim peasents rising against the oppression of Dogra Rajput landowners. The Poonch revolt was supported by nieghboring Paksitani Muslims, who crossed the borders of the state in numbers to aid co-religionists in their agrarain struggle for freedom. Hari Singh viewed the revolt as a Pakistani plot to depose him. The maharaja turned to New Dekhi for support and released Shigkh Abdulla from jail to fly there for talks with Nehru, who has supported his nationa Conference durrings it's previous decacde of struggle. On OCtober 21, 1947, the sheikh informed Delhi's press that the Kashmiris wwanted "freedom beforre accession." Pakistan's British army lorries were, however, already packed with thousands of Pathans, armed to the teeth, barreling east over the IUndus at Attock, where Alexanderr had crossed with his army, down the Jhelum river valley to the undefended Baramula Road, the highway to Sirinagar.

    On October 26, Hari Singh formally acceded to India and appealed for military support to defend Srinagar. Mountbatton insisted, in view of the prediminantly Muslim population of Kashmir, that India's acceptance "to be conditional on the will of the people being ascertained by a plebiscite after the raiders had been driven out of the State" and order was restored. Nehru an dhis cabinet agreed. The airlift of the first Sikh Battalion from Dehli to Srinagar was launched the following morning; the Vale's capital was saved and the tribal forces turned west witin a few days. Jinnah tried to hurl Pakistan's Army into a battle at this time, but his British commander-in-chief, General Gracey, explained that he coud not order his troops into compat against a siste dominon's forces without prior approval from his supreme commander, Field Marshal Auchinleck. Auchinleck flew to Lahore on October 28 to inform Govenor-General Jinnah that if he insisted upon sending Pakistn's Regular Army into Kashmir, which had "legall acceded" to India, it would "automaticallyy and immediately" require the withdrawal of every British officer serving with the Pakistan Army.

    The fighting in Kashmir raged on until the state's defacto partition was effected on a line of battle stablized just east of Uri and Poonch. The number of tribal raiders was about thirty thousand before the year's end, and these men became the regular army of the government of Azad ("Free") Kashmir, which held less than a quarter of the western portion of the state, exclluding the Vale. Azad Kashmir, with its capital at Muzaffarabad, susequently acceded to Paksitan. No plebiscite was ever help in Kashmir as a whole. Nehru insisted as a prerequisite to a plecibite that Paksitan "vacate its aggression" by withdrawing all "invaders" from Kashmir, and Jinnah proposed simultanous withdrawal of the "forces of Indian Dominino and the tribesmen." Sheikh Abdullah was flown back to Srinagar as premier. The cease-fire arranged by the United Nations would not come into effect in Kashmir until January 1, 1949."

    I replied to this in just 4-5 lines at the start ....even before I had read this !!!
    And Pakistan is trying the same thing with Afghanistan today.......it's settling a lot of it's people on Afghan land and unless the Afghan people wake up to the reality and join forces .....they will be losing a lot of land !!!
    This info. can be read about almost anywhere on the net !!
    LMK if u want to know the x-act sites !!!!!


    Now a little reference to the UN...

    Resolution 47 calling for a Plebiscte in Kashmir.
    "Noting with satisfaction that both India and Pakistan desire that the question of the accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India or Pakistan should be decided through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite"

    We have elections ....which are free and fair in Kashmir......but what about POK ( Pakistan Occupied Kashmir ) ......when was the last free elections held there.....
    If u have taken time to read up so much about this .....you must also be knowing that !!!
    Isn't it true that the people there are opressed and want to join INDIA !!!!!

    RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION FOR INDIA AND PAKISTAN ON 13 AUGUST 1948.
    "PART III
    The Government of India and the Government of Pakistan reaffirm their wish that the future status of the State of Jammu and Kashmir shall be determined in accordance with the will of the people and to that end, upon acceptance of the Truce Agreement both Governments agree to enter into consultations with the Commission to determine fair and equitable conditions whereby such free expression will be assured."

    Resolution 80 (1950)
    "Commending the Governments of India and Pakistan for their statesman like action in reaching the
    agreements embodied in the United Nations Commission's resolutions of August 13, 1948 and
    January 5, 1949 for a cease-fire, for the demilitarisation of the State of Jammu and Kashmir and for
    the determination of its final disposition in accordance with the will of the people through the
    democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite, and commending the parties in particular for
    their action in partially implementing these Resolutions by

    (1) The cessation of hostilities effected January 1, 1949,

    (2) The establishment of a cease-fire line on July 27, 1949, and

    (3) The agreement that Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz shall be Plebiscite Administrator,

    Considering that the resolution of the outstanding difficulties should be based upon the substantial
    measure of agreement of fundamental principles already reached, and that steps should be taken
    forthwith for the demilitarisation of the State and for the expeditious determination of its future in
    accordance with the freely expressed will of the inhabitants,

    1. Calls upon the Governments of India and Pakistan to make immediate arrangements, without
    prejudice to their rights or claims and with due regard to the requirements of law and order, to
    prepare and execute within a period of five months from the date of this resolution a programme of
    demilitarisation on the basis of the principles of paragraph 2 of General McNaughton proposal or of
    such modifications of those principles as may be mutually agreed;

    2. Decides to appoint a United Nations Representative for the following purposes who shall have
    authority to perform his functions in such place or places as he may deem appropriate;

    (a) to assist in the preparation and to supervise the implementation of the programme of
    demilitarisation referred to above and' to interpret the agreements reached by the parties for
    demilitarisation;

    (b) to place himself at the disposal of the Governments of India and Pakistan and to place
    before those Governments or the Security Council any suggestions which, in his opinion, are
    likely to contribute to the expeditious and enduring solution of the dispute which has arisen
    between the two Governments in regard to the State of Jammu and Kashmir; to exercise all of
    the powers and responsibilities devolving upon the United Nations Commission for India and
    Pakistan by reason of existing resolutions of the Security Council and by reason of the
    agreement of the parties embodied in the Resolutions of the United Nations Commission of
    August 13, 1948 and January 5, 1949; to arrange at the appropriate stage of demilitarisation
    for the assumption by the Plebiscite Administrator of the functions assigned to the latter under
    agreements made between the parties; to report to the Security Council as he may consider
    necessary, submitting his conclusions and any recommendations which he may desire to
    make; "




    "*RESOLUTION ADOPTED AT THE MEETING OF THE UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION FOR INDIA AND PAKISTAN ON 5 JANUARY, 1949. (DOCUMENT NO. S/1196, PARA IS, DATED THE 10TH JANUARY, 1949)


    THE UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION FOR INDIA AND PAKISTAN,


    Having received from the Governments of India and Pakistan in Communications, dated December 23 and December 25, 1948, respectively their acceptance of the following principles which are supplementary to the Commission's Resolution of August 13, 1948;



    The question of the accession of the State of Jammu and Kashmir to India or Pakistan will be decided through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite;


    A plebiscite will be held when it shall be found by the Commission that the cease-fire and truce arrangements set forth in Parts I and II of the Commission's resolution of 13 August 1948, have been carried out and arrangements for the plebiscite have been completed;



    The Secretary-General of the United Nations will, in agreement with the Commission, nominate a Plebiscite Administrator who shall be a personality of high international standing and commanding general confidence. He will be formally appointed to office by the Government of Jammu and Kashmir.


    The Plebiscite Administrator shall derive from the State of Jammu and Kashmir the powers he considers necessary for organizing and conducting the plebiscite and for ensuring the freedom and impartiality of the plebiscite.


    The Plebiscite Administrator shall have authority to appoint such staff or assistants and observers as he may require.



    After implementation of Parts I and II of the Commission's resolution of 13 August 1948, and when the Commission is satisfied that peaceful conditions have been restored in the State, the Commission and the Plebiscite Administrator will determine, in consultation with the Government of India, the final disposal of Indian and State armed forces, such disposal to be with due regard to the security of the State and the freedom of the plebiscite.


    As regards the territory referred to in A 2 of Part II of the resolution of 13 August, final disposal of the armed forces in that territory will be determined by the Commission and the Plebiscite Administrator in consultation with the local authorities.


    All civil and military authorities within the State and the principal political elements of the State will be required to co-operate with the Plebiscite Administrator in the preparation for and the holding of the plebiscite.



    All citizens of the State who have left it on account of the disturbances will be invited and be free to return and to exercise all their rights as such citizens. For the purpose of facilitating repatriation there shall be appointed two Commissions, one composed of nominees of India and the other of nominees of Pakistan.

    The Commissions shall operate under the direction of the Plebiscite Administrator. The Governments of India and Pakistan and all authorities within the State of Jammu and Kashmir will collaborate with the Plebiscite Administrator in putting this provision to effect.



    All persons (other than citizens of the State) who on or since 15 August 1947, have entered it for other than lawful purpose, shall be required to leave the State.


    All authorities within the State of Jammu and Kashmir will undertake to ensure in collaboration with the Plebiscite Administrator that:


    There is no threat, coercion or intimidation, bribery other undue influence on the voters in plebiscite;


    No restrictions are placed on legitimate political activity throughout the State. All subjects of the State, regardless of creed, caste or party, shall be safe and free in expressing their views and in voting on the question of the accession of the State to India or Pakistan. There shall be freedom of the Press, speech and assembly and freedom of travel in the State, including freedom of lawful entry and exit;


    All political prisoners are released;


    Minorities in all parts of the State are accorded adequate protection; and


    There is no victimization.


    The Plebiscite Administrator may refer to the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan problems on which he may require assistance, and the Commission may in its discretion call upon the Plebiscite Administrator to carry out on its behalf any of the responsibilities with which it has been entrusted;


    At the conclusion of the plebiscite, the Plebiscite Administrator shall report the result thereof to the Commission and to the Government of Jammu and Kashmir. The Commission shall then certify to the Security Council whether the Plebiscite has or has not been free and impartial;


    Upon the signature of the truce agreement the details of the foregoing proposals will be elaborated in the consultation envisaged in Part III of the Commission's resolution of 13 August 1948. The Plebiscite Administrator will be fully associated in these consultations;

    Commends the Governments of India and Pakistan for their prompt action in ordering a cease-fire to take effect from one minute before midnight of first January 1949, pursuant to the agreement arrived at as provided for by the Commission's resolution of 13 August 1948; and


    Resolves to return in the immediate future to the sub-continent to discharge the responsibilities imposed upon it by the resolution of 13 August 1948, and by the foregoing principles.

This is all hog-wash .......cos' you have very cleverly tried to skip the Shimla Agreement......that is where it is decided that there would be nothing of this sort and that kashmir will be a part of India.
The Pakistani government has signed that agreement with coercion !!!!

I will seriously suggest you to read up a little more history before starting a debate like this !!!

 

lawaris

Banned
Jun 26, 2001
3,690
1
0
And I was wondering......why are the muslims fighting everywhere ???

When will they be finally civilized ???:|

When will they realize that the world is in a modern age and not in the middle ages ??

That everyone has the same independence irrespective of their beliefs...........

That peace is the only way .....there is .......
 

lawaris

Banned
Jun 26, 2001
3,690
1
0
This is pointless, this has been happening in the region for a long time.

So it becomes pointless ???

Did you forget about the massive murder, rape and pilliage durring the partition?

I think u got it completely wrong here....the Hindus, Sikhs etc. were made to suffer this.....we allowed the muslims to stay here if they wanted !!!
There are of course stray cases.....but then it was a difficult time !!!

What about the destruction of the Babarhi Mosque?

A mosque built on the ruins of the sacred Hindu shrine !!!!U want to talk about that !!!!!!
Let's do it after a church or a temple has been built on the ruins of Mecca and Medina...

Pakistanis are not exclusive in this. It's a stupid desi trait.

That shows your lack of intelligence......U r categorising !!!!!!!!

At least pakistan doesn't deal in sex slavery.

Ever heard of HIRA-MANDI ???? THE BIGGEST SEX MARKET IN ASIA probably.......It's in PAKISTAN !!!!!!!

 

CichliSuite

Senior member
Jan 31, 2001
822
0
0
Its laughable how Xyyz comes to defend Pakistan and tries to point out India as "no better".

It is as clear as day to anyone with half a brain that Pakistan's raison d'etre is to vilify India.They jump up and down, building arms and straegic planning, yet never stop to figure out how to run their damn country so their people can eat.
1. Ironically, the non-muslim population of Pakistan has dwindled from fear and outright persecution while the muslim population of India has grown steadily. The fusion of church and state is EVIL. Secularity is what keeps these muslim nations in the hole they are in, but what else can they do? Islam simply cannot co-exist with others.

2. Pakistan, has been declared the one of the worlds most corrupt nation behind only Nigeria in one survey, and behind two in another
both by the Transparency International, a world-recognized berlin based group. India is 13 and 14th. respectively

3. Pakistan HAS NEVER had a stable government, nor a profitable economy (43 BILLION dollars in debt, i believe is the latest figure) since its inception, DESPITE U.S. aid. I wonder when another coup will occur, since Musharraf is a traitor to his own muslim bretheren, and especially so in the eyes of all the muslim extremists within its borders. Yes that's right. The Madrassas in Pakistan have become well-known in the lsat few months haven't they?

Let's face it, Pakistan is sh*tting in its pants. Afghanistan is actively negotiating with India - why do you think Pervez was desperately "warning" the US not to allow a Northern Alliance presence in the new government? Haha because the Taliban (read: Pakistan's front for its muslim agression) is now dead and its enemy is back in control!

Afghanistan on one side. India on the other. Uh Oh!
 

xyyz

Diamond Member
Sep 3, 2000
4,331
0
0


<< Its laughable how Xyyz comes to defend Pakistan and tries to point out India as "no better".

It is as clear as day to anyone with half a brain that Pakistan's raison d'etre is to vilify India.They jump up and down, building arms and straegic planning, yet never stop to figure out how to run their damn country so their people can eat.
1. Ironically, the non-muslim population of Pakistan has dwindled from fear and outright persecution while the muslim population of India has grown steadily. The fusion of church and state is EVIL. Secularity is what keeps these muslim nations in the hole they are in, but what else can they do? Islam simply cannot co-exist with others.
>>



You don't have much crediblity here after your support of David Duke... and now you have less crediblity because you simply argue with unfounded pejorative remarks against Pakistan. When you can show me someone like Stanley Wolpert supporting what you say... then we'll talk. Until then, shoo...

Pakistan and India vilify one another... they are both playing this game and they have both been playing it for ages. In the 70's and 80's it was about how India was more aligned with the former USSR. Now it's Pakistan "the terrorist nation."

Obviously you haven't been to Pakistan. One of the largest, if not the largest Mosque in Pakistan is the Badhshai Masjid in Lahore. In this Mosque you will find a Sikh templed integrated into it's walls. Why is it that this place hasn't been destroyed yet? Why is it that Sikhs make a major pilgramage to Pakistan, w/o fear of being slaughtered? The fact you have extremist groups in Pakistan, are a direct cause of the stupid Madrases that Musharf is doing a great job of shutting down.

Islam has coexisted with others for centuries... you need look no further than the Mughal Emperor of Akbar and the Turkish Empire.



<< 2. Pakistan, has been declared the one of the worlds most corrupt nation behind only Nigeria in one survey, and behind two in another
both by the Transparency International, a world-recognized berlin based group. India is 13 and 14th. respectively
>>



Man you really lost it here... now you've officially de-escalated your ranking to a "dumb-f"

I suggest you recheck your facts stupid-ass. I cannot STAND when people don't know what the F- they're talking about.

RECHECK YOUR FACTS ASSHOLE.

RANKING

India - 71
Pakistan - 79

transparency.org's ranking of corrupt governments in 2001

I'm sorry but this is a case of another stupid f- anti-pakistani indian prick and his lies. You see he offers NO evidence of what the hell he's saying... because if he did he'd have to crawl back in his hole.

I cannot stand people who make this S- up.



<< 3. Pakistan HAS NEVER had a stable government, nor a profitable economy (43 BILLION dollars in debt, i believe is the latest figure) since its inception, DESPITE U.S. aid. I wonder when another coup will occur, since Musharraf is a traitor to his own muslim bretheren, and especially so in the eyes of all the muslim extremists within its borders. Yes that's right. The Madrassas in Pakistan have become well-known in the lsat few months haven't they? >>



Many Maradases have been shutdown thanks to Musharaf. Mushrarf has also done a great job in restricting the breeding of new extremists. The Madrases have become well known for being shut down... apparently you don't watch too much news.



<< Let's face it, Pakistan is sh*tting in its pants. Afghanistan is actively negotiating with India - why do you think Pervez was desperately "warning" the US not to allow a Northern Alliance presence in the new government? Haha because the Taliban (read: Pakistan's front for its muslim agression) is now dead and its enemy is back in control!

Afghanistan on one side. India on the other. Uh Oh!
>>



You also forget how much money Pakistan has received because of this...

$1-billion in US aid
$1.32-billion poverty fighting loan which is part of a $9.5 billion promised loan.

"US President George W. Bush promised Pakistan $1-billion in aid last month.

That's a hell of a lot of money that can be used to move towards stabalization of that country.

You forget that Afghanistan is predominantly Pathan. The new President of Afghanistan is Pathan. Pathans have ultra close ethnic ties with Pakistan, because Pakistan is largly composed of Pathans. The northern aliance members were uzbek and tazik(sp?). While the NA did secure a some high seats... the president of Afghanistan is Pathan. We'll see who Afghanistan favors in the future.

You've spewed nothing but half-assed incorrect crap, which is expected from someone who hates Muslims and hates Pakistan.

I'll tell you another thing... India doesn't dare invade Pakistan. The know that Pakistan has a much more superior nuclear arsenal and that Pakistan, if pushed will use it to implement a quick population control of India.
 

xyyz

Diamond Member
Sep 3, 2000
4,331
0
0


<< So it becomes pointless ??? >>



The finger pointing that India is doing with Pakistan is pointless. If yer gonna sit on the pot either S- or get up. Saying that Pakistan has done this and that India will not tollerate it and make Pakistan pay, and then going and killing innocent people in Kashmir (oh...please please please ask me to provide proof of this) isn't helping anything.

What Delhi and Islamabad need to do is realize that the ethnic makeup is the same, and get back to what was started in Agra.



<< I think u got it completely wrong here....the Hindus, Sikhs etc. were made to suffer this.....we allowed the muslims to stay here if they wanted !!!
There are of course stray cases.....but then it was a difficult time !!!
>>



My poor misguided fellow, this was not suffering exclusive to the Hindu's and the Sikhs, you need to stop beliving this BS anti-muslim/pakistani rhetoric and realize that all desis were involved in this... I'll quote from Stanley Wolpert again, so that you may become educated, until then shut the hell up. Both sides commited attrocities.

"A New History of India" by Stanley Wolpert (4th edition)

"An estimated 10 million people changed lands that summer of 1947, and approximately one million of them never reached their promised nationa alive. A totally inadequate bondary force of fifty thousand troops, mostofthe infected with communal fever, had been assembled in the punjab to help make the transition a peaceful one. For the most part they stated in their barracks, cleaning their weapons and boots, while trainlods of Sikh refugees moving east were slaughtered by Muslims in Pakistan and Muslims moving east were butchered by Sikhs and Hindus in India. The stream became a flood, the flood a holocause of pain, looting, rape and murder."

May I further suggest, that those of you who know nothing about South Asian history shut the hell up, until you learn something to provide a decent rebuttal.



<< A mosque built on the ruins of the sacred Hindu shrine !!!!U want to talk about that !!!!!!
Let's do it after a church or a temple has been built on the ruins of Mecca and Medina...
>>



And for some reason, this grievance is taken up after a century or two? This wasn't a long brewing problem... some BJP-esque zelots got together and decided to beat down some Muslims.



<< That shows your lack of intelligence......U r categorising !!!!!!!! >>



No, this is a desi trait... I have history to back me... if you want me to give you a history lesson about how desis cannot get along with one another, please let me know... you are the one suffering from the lack of intelligence here... but i'll be happy to fill that void.



<< Ever heard of HIRA-MANDI ???? THE BIGGEST SEX MARKET IN ASIA probably.......It's in PAKISTAN !!!!!!! >>



You're so full of it... you're saying that Pakistan outdoes Thailand and India? You're obviously confused... let's see how many reports you can dig up about "hira-mandi" and how many I can pull about India's thriving sex slave business... oh and reputable sources only please... none of this BS indian media... and I won't pull anything from the pakistani media.
 

xyyz

Diamond Member
Sep 3, 2000
4,331
0
0

it's really funny how you pro-india people didn't bother to explain anything about how india did the same thing they are accusing pakistan of doing.

I guess history really comes and bites you in the ass eh?
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
lol, stay calm everyone. This thread is funny. Xyyz, are you Pakistani?

Most reports I've read state that India has the larger nuclear arsenal. Also, I find it sad that you endorse the use of nuclear weapons.

I think this problem will probably never be solved b/c the issue is too nationalistic or something in each nation (I'm guessing). I however don't believe a region should separate just because it has a different religions makeup.

BTW, anyone find it ironic that Pakistan calls for a vote in Kashmir yet Pakistan is run by a military dictator?
 

lawaris

Banned
Jun 26, 2001
3,690
1
0
I think that he has in his limited intelligence and a deep hatred of India being splewing a lot of venom here......

If you want a correct perspective of History....please read more about it and try not to quote just 1 person......it's as if u don't have attitudes of your own and are relying on someone else to put words in your mouth.

FACTS :

1. Pakistan is an Islamic country - it was created just because some misguided muslims thought that they would be better off by themselves......but a lot DID NOT - and they stayed back.

2. It has NUCLEAR WEAPONS but all those were given by the Chinese or designed with large Chinese inputs. Still it cannot match what we have.

3. Pakistan Nuclear Science is limited to just possessing a few BOMBS.....India uses Nuclear Power in a variety of Civilian use incld. generating electricity !!!

4. If there is a Nuclear War at any time.....what you should rem' is that you can waste maybe 4-5 cities of ours....we are too big for you guys but where will Pakistan be on this earth ??
We have enough to blow u out of existance.

5. U have fought 3 major and many smaller wars with us - AND LOST EVERYTIME !!! WILL U NEVER LEARN ??

6.Pushing in terrorists and Mujahideen is never going to get you eith Kashmir or Punjab - U just have to learn to live without them !!!!

7. THIS IS A PERSONAL REMARK FOR YOU :
Please moderate your words....there is no cause to abuse anyone here.....and those are some nasty words you have been using.
How would you feel if some-one calls you a "KATUA" everytime he replies.....or maybe something worse ???

BE INTELLIGENT !!!!
 

Nefrodite

Banned
Feb 15, 2001
7,931
0
0
funny thing is lots of cloths at mervyns is made in pakistan.. or atleast the last time i checked. gag.

and yes, xyyz is mister ad hominem
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |