I kid you not, this exact video was pretty much the exact same thing as wowpople "leaked" last year (pretty sure he was trolling). He deleted a lot of it though.For what it's worth
Can someone give me a TLDW of his claims? Because all of that sounds like straight BS.I kid you not, this exact video was pretty much the exact same thing as wowpople "leaked" last year (pretty sure he was trolling). He deleted a lot of it though.
Like the exact same stuff, down to the fact that two cores core fusion was the starting point, but would go up to 4. The only differences I can recall is that he claimed LNC was going to be the first architecture that uses this, but I don't think that's true either. And even then, RGT still said there might be a 'predecessor' to PTC that uses this royal cove plan, and the predecessor to PTC is LNC.
He also said that the big cores would be called internally under the 'molecule' line- aptly named from many different 'atom' cores being able to 'fuse' together to perform as a big core.
So this gives us two possibilities-
1)wowpople actually did talk to someone at Intel who either had real information or false information or was just messing with people, and that was the same guy RGT talked to as well
2)RGT saw the tweet from wowpople, and just essentially stole it, whether it was true or not
Either way though, I'm pretty sure it's not true. But who knows ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Can someone give me a TLDW of his claims? Because all of that sounds like straight BS.
Can someone give me a TLDW of his claims? Because all of that sounds like straight BS.
Yeah, that's what I hate the most about his content.That's part of the reason I don't like his videos. You are made to listen to the whole thing. With written articles you could skim to the point, but you cannot with the videos.
And this is the guy that claimed RDNA3 was 2.5x as fast as RDNA2. Worst of the worst.
Its not exactly to what was Paul alluding to.I kid you not, this exact video was pretty much the exact same thing as wowpople "leaked" last year (pretty sure he was trolling). He deleted a lot of it though.
Like the exact same stuff, down to the fact that two cores core fusion was the starting point, but would go up to 4. The only differences I can recall is that he claimed LNC was going to be the first architecture that uses this, but I don't think that's true either. And even then, RGT still said there might be a 'predecessor' to PTC that uses this royal cove plan, and the predecessor to PTC is LNC.
He also said that the big cores would be called internally under the 'molecule' line- aptly named from many different 'atom' cores being able to 'fuse' together to perform as a big core.
So this gives us two possibilities-
1)wowpople actually did talk to someone at Intel who either had real information or false information or was just messing with people, and that was the same guy RGT talked to as well
2)RGT saw the tweet from wowpople, and just essentially stole it, whether it was true or not
Either way though, I'm pretty sure it's not true. But who knows ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I'm not going to watch the video. But every single point @Geddagod listed from it is false. So he's either an idiot being lied to, or more likely, he's just BSing and/or plagiarizing the whole thing for views. That's basically his entire schtick, but people keep falling for it.Its not exactly to what was Paul alluding to.
He pretty much said 50% of what he knows on the topic of Royal core. He twisted some things on purpose, to not spill all of the beans on this topic because: A) he couldn't double source it, B) there are still sensitive things there.
Basically, Royal core is supposed to be, according to those claims, something like Bulldozer architecture, but done properly, where Cores can merge together to form larger core, to increase efficiency and Instruction per Clock.That's part of the reason I don't like his videos. You are made to listen to the whole thing. With written articles you could skim to the point, but you cannot with the videos.
And this is the guy that claimed RDNA3 was 2.5x as fast as RDNA2. Worst of the worst.
Why do you assume he didn't make it all up?Basically, Royal core is supposed to be, according to those claims, something like Bulldozer architecture, but done properly, where Cores can merge together to form larger core, to increase efficiency and Instruction per Clock.
Look. Paul is only reporting of what he was told.
I don't assume. I know that he didn't.Why do you assume he didn't make it all up?
So, all the times he's gotten stuff hilariously wrong, this included, have just been him being fed misinformation? The best possible interpretation right now is that he's a gullible idiot that believes what anyone tells him. But given his complete unwillingness to change his behavior, it seems far more deliberate. At best, he doesn't care that he's spouting BS.I don't assume. I know that he didn't.
I don't know about past things.So, all the times he's gotten stuff hilariously wrong, this included, have just been him being fed misinformation? The best possible interpretation right now is that he's a gullible idiot that believes what anyone tells him. But given his complete unwillingness to change his behavior, it seems far more deliberate. At best, he doesn't care that he's spouting BS.
Fine, then he's profiting from misinformation he's too incompetent or unwilling to identify.I don't know about past things.
I know that this one he didn't made up.
And going to end the same way.Sounds like reverse HT all over again.
Sadly, this is the truth amongst many leakers/rumor mill websites in the PC hardware space. There are no real journalists these days. Most just care about ad impressions, view counts, and being the first to publish. Due diligence and vetting of information is not even a consideration. One of the worst things that happened as a result of this approach is how many of these sites will now "report" on topics that are somewhat financially related, e.g. market share, earnings reports, macro economics, supply chain, etc. because it's another source of monetizable content, but they are clearly not knowledgeable enough to handle that info. Quotes get misquoted, statements get interpreted incorrectly... It's honestly pisses me off since we need more good knowledge in this space, not less of it. It's honestly the biggest reason why I stick around here on AT forums, because at least we have a community here that cares about the in-depth aspects.Fine, then he's profiting from misinformation he's too incompetent or unwilling to identify.
I will be 100% frank, the Apple space has better leakers that report leaks and rumours of Apple hardware and software. The Android Space when it comes to leaks and rumors is great too. NO out of this world BS like the PC space.Sadly, this is the truth amongst many leakers/rumor mill websites in the PC hardware space. There are no real journalists these days. Most just care about ad impressions, view counts, and being the first to publish. Due diligence and vetting of information is not even a consideration. One of the worst things that happened as a result of this approach is how many of these sites will now "report" on topics that are somewhat financially related, e.g. market share, earnings reports, macro economics, supply chain, etc. because it's another source of monetizable content, but they are clearly not knowledgeable enough to handle that info. Quotes get misquoted, statements get interpreted incorrectly... It's honestly pisses me off since we need more good knowledge in this space, not less of it. It's honestly the biggest reason why I stick around here on AT forums, because at least we have a community here that cares about the in-depth aspects.
There are still good tech sites these days, albeit rarer than they once were. But even the mainstream mediocre ones (Tom's, (sadly) Anandtech, Ars, etc.) aren't this bad. The Youtube "leakers" are disproportionately responsible for passing off these blatant falsifications as fact. Even compared to rumor mills, at least Videocardz has some filtering. This is as bad as wccftech, if not worse. And they make you wade through terrible videos for a paragraph's worth of "information", which just rubs salt into the wound.Sadly, this is the truth amongst many leakers/rumor mill websites in the PC hardware space. There are no real journalists these days. Most just care about ad impressions, view counts, and being the first to publish. Due diligence and vetting of information is not even a consideration. One of the worst things that happened as a result of this approach is how many of these sites will now "report" on topics that are somewhat financially related, e.g. market share, earnings reports, macro economics, supply chain, etc. because it's another source of monetizable content, but they are clearly not knowledgeable enough to handle that info. Quotes get misquoted, statements get interpreted incorrectly... It's honestly pisses me off since we need more good knowledge in this space, not less of it. It's honestly the biggest reason why I stick around here on AT forums, because at least we have a community here that cares about the in-depth aspects.
Mac rumours and 9to5mac/google also are much better than PC news YouTubersThere are still good tech sites these days, albeit rarer than they once were. But even the mainstream mediocre ones (Tom's, (sadly) Anandtech, Ars, etc.) aren't this bad. The Youtube "leakers" are disproportionately responsible for passing off these blatant falsifications as fact. Even compared to rumor mills, at least Videocardz has some filtering. This is as bad as wccftech, if not worse. And they make you wade through terrible videos for a paragraph's worth of "information", which just rubs salt into the wound.
There are still good tech sites these days, albeit rarer than they once were. But even the mainstream mediocre ones (Tom's, (sadly) Anandtech, Ars, etc.) aren't this bad. The Youtube "leakers" are disproportionately responsible for passing off these blatant falsifications as fact. Even compared to rumor mills, at least Videocardz has some filtering. This is as bad as wccftech, if not worse. And they make you wade through terrible videos for a paragraph's worth of "information", which just rubs salt into the wound.
1) He just rambles on and on when it can be presented more succinctly in 3 minutes.
A whole other universe level of nonsense. 😂😂RGT is whole another level of nonsens
Ah 2006 the early multi-core era combined with the Conroe hype spawned many rumors. AMD was just about to response with the core-merging tech.Sounds like reverse HT all over again.